Rehabilitation strategies enhancing participation in shopping malls for persons living with a disability

References

• United Nations General Assembly. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [Internet]. UN Web Services Section, Department of Public Information. 2007. [07-20-2016]. Available from: http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers AR, Anderson JJ, Miller DR, et al. Barriers, facilitators, and access for wheelchair users: substantive and methodologic lessons from a pilot study of environmental effects. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55:1435–1446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization, The World Bank. World Report on Disability [Internet]: WHO. 2011. [11-29-2016]. Available from: http://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Levasseur M, Richard L, Gauvin L, et al. Inventory and analysis of definitions of social participation found in the aging literature: proposed taxonomy of social activities. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71:2141–2149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Network on the Disability Creation Process [Internet] Québec (QC): INDCP. 2016 [12-09-2016]. Available from: http://ripph.qc.ca/en.
   Google Scholar
• Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, et al. What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:1445–1460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office des personnes handicapées du Québec. Equals in every respect: because rights are meant to be exercised. Drummondville (QC): Library and Archives Canada; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Skempes D, Stucki G, Bickenbach J. Health-related rehabilitation and human rights: analyzing states' obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:163–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS). L'organisation et la prestation de services de réadaptation pour les personnes ayant subi un accident vasculaire cérébral (AVC) et leurs proches. [Organisation and provision of rehabilitation services for persons who had cerebral vascular accident [CVA] and their relatives]. Report written by Annie Tessier ETMIS. 2012;8:1–101 [French].
   Google Scholar
• Cott CA. Client-centred rehabilitation: client perspectives. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:1411–1422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devos H, Akinwuntan AE, Nieuwboer A, et al. Comparison of the effect of two driving retraining programs on on-road performance after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:699–705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhogal SK, Teasell RW, Foley NC, et al. Community reintegration after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2003;10:107–129.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wiles R, Ashburn A, Payne S, et al. Discharge from physiotherapy following stroke: the management of disappointment. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59:1263–1273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth EJ, Lovell L. Community skill performance and its association with the ability to perform everyday tasks by stroke survivors one year following rehabilitation discharge. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007;14:48–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwarsson S. Accessibility, usability and universal design-positioning and definition of concepts describing person-environment relationships. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:57–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand D, Weiss PL, Katz N. Training multitasking in a virtual supermarket: a novel intervention after stroke. Am J Occup Ther. 2009;63:535–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burleigh SA, Farber RS, Gillard M. Community integration and life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury: long-term findings. Am J Occup Ther. 1998;52:45–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman-Maeir A, Eliad Y, Kizoni R, et al. Evaluation of a long-term community based rehabilitation program for adult stroke survivors. NeuroRehabilitation. 2007;22:295–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehayia E, Swaine B, Longo C, et al. Creating a rehabilitation living lab to optimize participation and inclusion for persons with physical disabilities. ALTER – Eur J Disabil Res. 2014;8:151–157.
   Google Scholar
• Swaine B, Labbé D, Poldma T, et al. Exploring the facilitators and barriers to shopping mall use by persons with disabilities and strategies for improvements: Perspectives from persons with disabilities, rehabilitation professionals and shopkeepers. ALTER – Eur J Disabil Res. 2014;8:217–229.
   Google Scholar
• Dahan-Oliel N, Shikako-Thomas K, Mazer B, et al. Adolescents with disabilities participate in the shopping mall: facilitators and barriers framed according to the ICF. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:2102–2113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen J, Dyas J, Jones M. Building consensus in health care: a guide to using the nominal group technique. Br J Community Nurs. 2004;9:110–114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palys T. Purposive sampling. In: Given LM, editor. The sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Vol. 2. Los Angeles (CA): Sage; 2008: p. 697–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hollander JA. The social contexts of focus groups. J Contemp Ethnogr. 2004;33:602–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH, Delbecq AL. The nominal group as a research instrument for exploratory health studies. Am J Public Health. 1972;62:337–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey N, Holmes CA. Nominal group technique: an effective method for obtaining group consensus. Int J Nurs Pract. 2012;18:188–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan A, Black SE, Duchan JF, et al. Training volunteers as conversation partners using “supported conversation for adults with aphasia” (SCA): a controlled trial. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001;44:624–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park (CA): Sage; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, et al. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89:1245–1251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards H, Emslie C. The 'doctor' or the 'girl from the University'? Considering the influence of professional roles on qualitative interviewing. Fam Pract. 2000;17:71–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recio AC, Becker D, Morgan M, et al. Use of a virtual reality physical ride-on sailing simulator as a rehabilitation tool for recreational sports and community reintegration. A pilot study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;92:1104–1109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfenden B, Grace M. Returning to work after stroke: a review. Int J Rehabil Res. 2009;32:93–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gassaway J, Dijkers M, Rider C, et al. Therapeutic recreation treatment time during inpatient rehabilitation. J Spinal Cord Med. 2011;34:176–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderploeg RD, Belanger HG, Duchnick JD, et al. Awareness problems following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: prevalence, assessment methods, and injury correlates. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007;44:937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doig E, Fleming J, Cornwell P, et al. Comparing the experience of outpatient therapy in home and day hospital settings after traumatic brain injury: patient, significant other and therapist perspectives. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:1203–1214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fong K, Chow K, Chan B, et al. Usability of a virtual reality environment simulating an automated teller machine for assessing and training persons with acquired brain injury. J NeuroEng Rehabil. 2010;7:19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand D, Katz N, Weiss PL. Evaluation of virtual shopping in the VMall: comparison of post-stroke participants to healthy control groups. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1710–1719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youn Joo K, Jeonghun K, Kiwan H, et al. Development and clinical trial of virtual reality-based cognitive assessment in people with stroke: preliminary study. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008;11:329–339.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fleming J, Nalder E, Alves-Stein S, et al. The effect of environmental barriers on community integration for individuals with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014;29:125–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner P. The role of social engagement and identity in community mobility among older adults aging in place. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:1249–1257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson CA, Shumway-Cook A, Ciol MA, et al. Participation in community walking following stroke: subjective versus objective measures and the impact of personal factors. Phys Ther. 2011;91:1865–1876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Dorze G, Salois-Bellerose E, Alepins M, et al. A description of the personal and environmental determinants of participation several years post-stroke according to the views of people who have aphasia. Aphasiology. 2014;28:421–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar