Cross-cultural validity of the ABILOCO questionnaire for individuals with stroke, based on Rasch analysis

References

• Leciñana MA, Gutiérrez-Fernández M, Romano M, et al. Strategies to improve recovery in acute ischemic stroke patients: Iberoamerican stroke group consensus. Int J Stroke 2014;9:503–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray CJ, Vos T, Naghavi M, et al. Disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the global. Burden of Disease Study. 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2197–2223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr JH, Shepherd RB. Neurological rehabilitation: optimizing motor performance, 2nd ed. Oxford: Churchill Livingstone; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Caty GD, Arnould C, Stoquart GG, et al. ABILOCO: a Rasch-built 13-item questionnaire to assess locomotion ability in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:284–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alzahrani M, Dean C, Ada L. Relationship between walking performance and types of community-based activities in people with stroke: an observational study. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2011;15:45–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pinto-Carral A, Fernández-Villa T, Molina de la Torre AJ. Patient reported mobility: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil pii: S0003-9993(16)00093-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.01.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimby G, Tennant A, Tesio L. The use of raw scores from ordinal scales: time to end malpractice? J Rehabil Med. 2012;44:97–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caty GD, Theunissen E, Lejeune TM. Reproducibility of the ABILOCO questionnaire and comparison between self-reported and observed locomotion ability in adult patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:1061–1063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant A, Penta M, Tesio L, et al. Assessing and adjusting for cross-cultural validity of impairment and activity limitation scales through differential item functioning within the framework of the Rasch model: the PRO-ESOR project. Med Care. 2004;42:S37–S48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186–3191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Küçükdeveci AA, Sahin H, Ataman S, et al. Issues in cross-cultural validity: example from the adaptation, reliability, and validity testing of a Turkish version of the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51:14–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant A, Conaghan PG. The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: what is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57:1358–1362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien CW, Bond TG. Measurement properties of fine motor scale of Peabody developmental motor scales-second edition: a Rasch analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;88:376–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Faria CDCM, Teixeira-Salmela LF, Nadeau S. Predicting levels of basic functional mobility, as assessed by the Timed “Up and Go” test, for individuals with stroke: discriminant analyses. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:146–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregson JM, Leathley M, Moore AP, et al. Reliability of the tone assessment scale and the modified Ashworth scale as clinical tools for assessing poststroke spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:1013–1016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolucci P, Brucki S, Campacci S, et al. The Mini-mental state examination in an outpatient population: influence of literacy. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 1994;52:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen WH, Lenderking W, Jin Y, et al. Is Rasch model analysis applicable in small sample size pilot studies for assessing item characteristics? An example using PROMIS pain behavior item bank data. Qual Life Res. 2014;23:485–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penta M, Tesio L, Arnould C, et al. The ABILHAND Questionnaire as a measure of manual ability in chronic stroke patients: Rasch-based validation and relationship to upper limb impairment. Stroke. 2001;32:1627–1634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8:94–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saliba VA, Magalhães LC, Faria CDCM, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and analysis of the psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Motor Activity Log. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2011;30:262–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelsen SM, Rocha AS, Knabben RJ, et al. Translation, adaptation and inter-rater reliability of the administration manual for the Fugl-Meyer assessment. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2011;15:80–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Faria CDCM, Teixeira-Salmela LF, Neto MG, et al. Performance-based tests in subjects with stroke: outcome scores, reliability and measurement errors. Clin Rehabil. 2011;26:460–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. A User's Guide to Winsteps® Ministep Rasch-Model Computer Programs: Program Manual 3.81.0. Chicago: WINSTEPS.com, 2015. [Internet] Available from: http://www.winsteps.com/winman/index.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Chern JS, Kielhofner G, De Las Heras CG, et al. The volitional questionnaire: psychometric development and practical use. Am J Occup Ther. 1996;50:516–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira-Salmela LF, Magalhães LC, Souza AC, et al. Adaptation of the Nottingham Health Profile: a simple measure to assess quality of life. Rep Public Health. 2004;20:905–914.
   Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: application to practice, 3rd edn. New Jersey: Pearson Education; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Basílio ML, de Faria-Fortini I, Magalhães LC, et al. Cross-cultural validity of the Brazilian version of the ABILHAND questionnaire for chronic stroke individuals, based on Rasch analysis. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48:6–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batcho CS, Tennant A, Thonnard JL. ACTIVLIM-Stroke: a cross-cultural Rasch-built scale of activity limitations in patients with stroke. Stroke. 2012;43:815–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumont C, Bertrand R, Fougeyrollas P, et al. Rasch modeling and the measurement of social participation. J Appl Meas. 2003;4:309–325.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lemmens RJ, Timmermans AA, Janssen-Potten YJ, et al. Valid and reliable instruments for arm-hand assessment at ICF activity level in persons with hemiplegia: a systematic review. BMC Neurol. 2012;12:1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry J, Burnfield J. Gait analysis: normal and pathological function, 2nd edn. Thorofare: Slack; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Keller ML, Gallek MJ, Taylor-Piliae RE. Predictors of stroke survivors’ enrollment in an exercise study. Health Aging Res. 2015;4:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry J, Garrett M, Gronley JK, et al. Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. Stroke 1995;26:982–989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehab-scales.org [Internet]. Belgium: Université catholique de Louvain; c2007 [cited 2015 Dec 06]. Available from: http://www.rehab-scales.org/abiloco-downloads.html.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability, and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001
   Google Scholar
• van Delden AL, Peper CL, Beek PJ, et al. Match and mismatch between objective and subjective improvements in upper limb function after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:1961–1967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar