Involving people with dementia in developing an interactive web tool for shared decision-making: experiences with a participatory design approach

References

• Dewing J. Process consent and research with older persons living with dementia. Res Ethics Rev. 2008;4:59–64.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy K, Jordan F, Hunter A, et al. Articulating the strategies for maximising the inclusion of people with dementia in qualitative research studies. Dementia. 2015;14:800–824.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Span M, Hettinga M, Vernooij-Dassen MJFJ, et al. Involving people with dementia in the development of supportive IT applications: a systematic review. Ageing Res Rev. 2013;12:535–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellström I, Nolan M, Nordenfelt L, et al. Ethical and methodological issues in interviewing persons with dementia. Nurs Ethics. 2007;14:608–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygård L. How can we get access to the experiences of people with dementia? Suggestions and reflections. Scand J Occup Ther. 2006;13:101–112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilkinson H. (2002). Including people with dementia in research: methods and motivations. In: Wilkinson H. editor. The perspectives of people with dementia, research methods and motivation. London: Jessica Kingsley. p. 9–24.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor JS, DeMers SM, Vig EK, et al. The disappearing subject: exclusion of people with cognitive impairment and dementia from geriatrics research. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60:413–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson E, Magnusson L, Arvidsson H, et al. Working together with persons with early stage dementia and their family members to design a user-friendly technology-based support service. Dementia. 2007;6:411–434.
   Google Scholar
• Von Kutzleben M, Schmid W, Halek M, et al. Community-dwelling persons with dementia: What do they need? What do they demand? What do they do? A systematic review on the subjective experiences of persons with dementia. Aging Ment Health. 2012;16:378–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitlatch J, Menne H. Don’t forget about me. Decision making by people with dementia. J Am Soc Aging. 2009;33:66–71.
   Google Scholar
• Reamy AM, Kim K, Zarit SH, et al. Understanding discrepancy in perceptions of values: individuals with mild to moderate dementia and their family caregivers. Gerontologist. 2011;51:473–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meulenbroek O, Vernooij-Dassen M, Kessels RPC, et al. Informed consent in dementia research. Legislation, theoretical concepts and how to assess capacity to consent. Eur Geriatr Med. 2010;1:58–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cubit K. Informed consent for research involving people with dementia: a grey area. Contemp Nurse. 2010;34:230–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menne HL, Tucke SS, Whitlatch CJ, et al. Decision-making involvement scale for individuals with dementia and family caregivers. Am J Alzheimer’s Dis Other Demen. 2008;23:23–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetherstonhaugh D, Tarzia L, Bauer M, et al. “The red dress or the blue?”: how do staff perceive that they support decision making for people with dementia living in residential aged care facilities? J Appl Gerontol. 2016;35:209–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Span M, Smits C, Groen-van de Ven LM, et al. Towards an interactive web tool that supports shared decision making in dementia: identifying user requirements. Int J Adv Life Sci. 2014;6:338–349.
   Google Scholar
• Span M, Smits C, Groen-van de Ven LM, et al. An interactive web tool to facilitate shared decision making in dementia: design issues perceived by caregivers and patients. Int J Adv Life Sci. 2014;6:107–121.
   Google Scholar
• Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P. Shared decision-making in primary care: the neglected second half of the consultation. Br J Gen Pract. 1999;49:477–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwyn G, Laitner S, Coulter A, et al. Implementing shared decision making in the NHS. BMJ. 2010;341:c5146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohlbacher F. The use of qualitative content analysis in case study research. Forum: Qual Soc Res. 2006;7:Art. 21. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0601211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. California: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Heaton J. Reworking qualitative data. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.; 2004. p. 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Hinds PS, Vogel RJ, Clarke-Steffen L. The possibilities and pitfalls of doing a secondary analysis of a qualitative data set. Qual Health Res. 1997;7:408–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gemert-Pijnen JEWC, Nijland N, Van Limburg MAH, et al. Introducing a holistic framework for eHealth technologies. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13:e111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy J, Oliver T. The use of Talking Mats to support people with dementia and their carers to make decisions together. Health Soc Care Community. 2013;21:171–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savitch N, Zaphiris P. Accessible websites for people with dementia: a preliminary investigation into information architecture. Paper presented at: ICCHP; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Reisberg B, Ferris SH, de Leon MJ, et al. The global deterioration scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia. Am J Psychiatry. 1982;139:1136–1139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brender J. Handbook of evaluation methods for health informatics. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman A. Social research methods. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Groen-van de Ven L, Smits C, Span M, et al. The challenges of shared decision making in dementia care networks. Int Psychogeriatr. 2016;9:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert SD, Loiselle CG. Combining individual interviews and focus groups to enhance data richness. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62:228–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger J. The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociol Health Illness. 1994;16:103–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer H, Holzblatt K. Contextual design. Defining customer-centered systems. Morgan: Kaufmann Publishers; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Nijland N. Grounding eHealth: towards a holistic framework for sustainable eHealth technologies,Enschede: University of Twente; 2011. ISBN: 9789036531337.
   Google Scholar
• Jaspers MWM, Steen T, Bos CVD, et al. The think aloud method: a guide to user interface design. Int J Med Inform. 2004;73:781–795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacey A, Luff D. Qualitative research analysis. The NIHR RDS for the East Midlands/Yorkshire and the Humber 2009. Available from: Yorkshire and the Humber.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG, editors. Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Brannelly T. Negotiating ethics in dementia care: an analysis of an ethic of care in practice. Dementia (14713012). 2006;5:197–212.
   Google Scholar
• Brannelly T. Sustaining citizenship: people with dementia and the phenomenon of social death. Nurs Ethics. 2011;18:662–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahill S, Begley E, Topo P, et al. ‘I know where this is going and I know it won’t go back’: hearing the individual’s voice in dementia quality of life assessments. Dementia. 2004;3:313–330.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gorp B, Vercruysse T. Frames and counter-frames giving meaning to dementia: a framing analysis of media content. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74:1274–1281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu HC. Does social participation by the elderly reduce mortality and cognitive impairment? Aging Ment Health. 2007;11:699–707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gove DM. GPs, stigma and the timely diagnosis of dementia: a qualitative exploration: the implications of general practitioners' perceptions of dementia as a stigma for timely diagnosis. [dissertation]. University of Bradford; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Vernooij-Dassen M, Leatherman S, Olde Rikkert M. Quality of care in frail older people: the fragile balance between receiving and giving. 2011;342:d403.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeting H, Gilhooly M. Dementia and the phenomenon of social death. Sociol Health Illness. 1997;19:93–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alzheimer Europe. Personal experiences of living with dementia. 2012. Available from: http://www.alzheimer-europe.org/Living-with-dementia/Personal-experiences-of-living-with-dementia.
   Google Scholar
• Alzheimer Europe. The ethical issues linked to the perceptions and portrayal of dementia and people with dementia. 2014. Available from: http://www.alzheimer-europe.org/Ethics/Ethical-issues-in-practice/The-ethical-issues-linked-to-the-perceptions-and-portrayal-of-dementia-and-people-with-dementia/How-dementia-is-perceived-and-portrayed/The-characteristics-attributes-associated-with-dementia/(language)/eng-GB.
   Google Scholar
• Moniz-Cook E, Vernooij-Dassen M, Woods B, et al. Psychosocial interventions in dementia care research: the INTERDEM manifesto. Aging Ment Health. 2011;15:283–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boman I-L, Nygård L, Rosenberg L. Users’ and professionals’ contributions in the process of designing an easy-to-use videophone for people with dementia. Disab Rehab Assist Technol. 2014;9:164–172.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar