Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Arabic version of the knee outcome survey-activities for daily living scale

References

• Bindawas SM, Vennu V, Auais M. Health-related quality of life in older adults with bilateral knee pain and back pain: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Rheumatol Int. 2015;35:2095–2101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esculier JF, Roy JS, Bouyer LJ. Psychometric evidence of self-reported questionnaires for patellofemoral pain syndrome: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:2181–2190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins NJ, Misra D, Felson DT, et al. Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS). Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(Suppl 11):S208–S228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D, Jones MH, Khair MM, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures for the knee. J Knee Surg. 2010;23:137–151.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF. Development and validation of health-related quality of life measures for the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;402:95–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irrgang JJ, Snyder-Mackler L, Wainner RS, et al. Development of a patient-reported measure of function of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1132–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx RG, Jones EC, Allen AA, et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of four knee outcome scales for athletic patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A:1459–1469.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Piva SR, Gil AB, Moore CG, et al. Responsiveness of the activities of daily living scale of the knee outcome survey and numeric pain rating scale in patients with patellofemoral pain. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:129–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams VJ, Piva SR, Irrgang JJ, et al. Comparison of reliability and responsiveness of patient-reported clinical outcome measures in knee osteoarthritis rehabilitation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42:716–723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Impellizzeri FM, Mannion AF, Leunig M, et al. Comparison of the reliability, responsiveness, and construct validity of 4 different questionnaires for evaluating outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:861–869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominick GM, Zeni JA, White DK. Association of psychosocial factors with physical activity and function after total knee replacement: an exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97:S218–S225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulshrestha V, Datta B, Kumar S, et al. Outcome of unicondylar knee arthroplasty vs total knee arthroplasty for early medial compartment arthritis: a randomized study. J Arthroplasty. 2016 [cited on 10 January 2017];[1--10]. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esculier JF, Bouyer LJ, Roy JS. The effects of a multimodal rehabilitation program on symptoms and ground-reaction forces in runners with patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Sport Rehabil. 2016;25:23–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro J, Branco J, Figueiredo P, et al. Function and physical activity level 2 to 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. J Traumatol Sport. 2013;30:3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald GK, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L. A decision-making scheme for returning patients to high-level activity with nonoperative treatment after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;8:76–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bizzini M, Gorelick M. Development of a German version of the knee outcome survey for daily activities. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127:781–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soles Gonçalves R, Cabri J, Páscoa Pinheiro J. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Portuguese version of the Knee Outcome Survey-Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADLS). Clin Rheumatol. 2008;27:1445–1449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evcik D, Ay S, Ege A, et al. Adaptation and validation of Turkish version of the knee outcome survey-activities for daily living scale. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2077–2082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapreli E, Panelli G, Strimpakos N, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Greek version of the Knee Outcome Survey-Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADLS). Knee. 2011;18:424–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy J-S, Esculier J-F, Maltais DB. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the Knee Outcome Survey-Activities of Daily Living Scale. Clin Rehabil. 2014;28:614–623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia ZY, Wang W, Nian XW, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the simplified Chinese version of the Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale. Arthroscopy. 2016;32:2009–2016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holes C. Modern Arabic: structures, functions, and varieties. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Albirini A. Modern Arabic Sociolinguistics. London and New York: Routledge (Tylor & Francis Group); 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Khalaila R. Translation of questionnaires into Arabic in cross-cultural research: techniques and equivalence issues. J Transcult Nurs. 2013;24:363–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerosch-Herold C. An evidence-based approach to choosing outcome measures: a checklist for the critical appraisal of validity, reliability and responsiveness studies. Br J Occup Ther. 2005;68:347–353.
   Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186–3191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawker G, Melfi C, Paul J, et al. Comparison of a generic (SF-36) and a disease specific (WOMAC) (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) instrument in the measurement of outcomes after knee replacement surgery. J Rheumatol. 1995;22:1193–1196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin M, Kosinski M, Bjorner JB, et al. Item response theory methods can improve the measurement of physical function by combining the modified health assessment questionnaire and the SF-36 physical function scale. Qual Life Res. 2007;16:647–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bombardier C, Melfi CA, Paul J, et al. Comparison of a generic and a disease-specific measure of pain and physical function after knee replacement surgery. Med Care. 1995;33:AS131–AS144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coons SJ, Alabdulmohsin SA, Draugalis JR, et al. Reliability of an Arabic version of the RAND-36 Health Survey and its equivalence to the US-English version. Med Care. 1998;36:428–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartrick CT, Kovan JP, Shapiro S. The numeric rating scale for clinical pain measurement: a ratio measure? Pain Pract. 2003;3:310–316.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alghadir AH, Anwer S, Iqbal ZA. The psychometric properties of an Arabic numeric pain rating scale for measuring osteoarthritis knee pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:2392–2397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer D, Stewart AL, Bloch DA, et al. Capturing the patient’s view of change as a clinical outcome measure. JAMA. 1999;282:1157–1162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurley MV, Scott DL, Rees J, et al. Sensorimotor changes and functional performance in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997;56:641–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piva SR, Fitzgerald GK, Irrgang JJ, et al. Get up and go test in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:284–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida GJ, Schroeder CA, Gil AB, et al. Interrater reliability and validity of the stair ascend/descend test in subjects with total knee arthroplasty. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:932–938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley SM, Fragala-Pinkham MA. Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2006;86:735–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Health; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8:135–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care. 1989;27:S178–S189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, et al. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:459–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Riddle DL. Health status measures: strategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores. Phys Ther. 1996;76:1109–1123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Osoba D, Wu AW, Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting G, et al. Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77:371–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almangoush A, Herrington L, Attia I, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, internal consistency and validation of the Arabic version of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for Egyptian people with knee injuries. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21:1855–1864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brach JS, VanSwearingen JM, Newman AB, et al. Identifying early decline of physical function in community-dwelling older women: performance-based and self-report measures. Phys Ther. 2002;82:320–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cress ME, Schechtman KB, Mulrow CD, et al. Relationship between physical performance and self-perceived physical function. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995;43:93–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuben DB, Valle LA, Hays RD, et al. Measuring physical function in community-dwelling older persons: a comparison of self-administered, interviewer-administered, and performance-based measures. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995;43:17–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozzini R, Frisoni GB, Ferrucci L, et al. The effect of chronic diseases on physical function. Comparison between activities of daily living scales and the Physical Performance Test. Age Ageing. 1997;26:281–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Katz JN, et al. A taxonomy for responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:1204–1217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar