1,281
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

An in-depth understanding of the impact of the environment on participation among people with spinal cord injury

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 2192-2199 | Received 09 Nov 2016, Accepted 04 May 2017, Published online: 22 May 2017

References

  • Somers MF. Spinal cord injury: functional rehabilitation New York (NY): Prentice Hall; 2009.
  • Kennedy P, Lude P, Elfström ML, et al. Psychological contributions to functional independence: a longitudinal investigation of spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:597–602.
  • Craig A, Tran Y, Wijesuriya N, et al. Fatigue and tiredness in people with spinal cord injury. J Psychosom Res. 2012;73:205–210.
  • Carpenter C, Forwell SJ, Jongbloed LE, et al. Community participation after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:427–433.
  • Lidal IB, Huynh TK, Biering-Sørensen F. Return to work following spinal cord injury: a review. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1341–1375.
  • Newman SD. Evidence-based advocacy: using photovoice to identify barriers and facilitators to community participation after spinal cord injury. Rehabil. Nurs. 2010;35:47–59.
  • Murphy GC, Young AE. Employment participation following spinal cord injury: relation to selected participant demographic, injury and psychological characteristics. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:1297–1306.
  • Murphy G, Middleton J, Quirk R, et al. Prediction of employment status one year post-discharge from rehabilitation following traumatic spinal cord injury: an exploratory analysis of participation and environmental variables. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:1074–1079.
  • Craig A, Nicholson Perry K, Guest R, et al. Adjustment following chronic spinal cord injury: Determining factors that contribute to social participation. Br J Health Psychol. 2015;20:807–823.
  • Barclay L, McDonald R, Lentin P. Social and community participation following spinal cord injury: a critical review. Int J Rehabil Res. 2015;38:1–19.
  • Tseng SH, Chang FH. Transitioning from hospitals to the community: perspectives of rehabilitation patients with neurological disorders and their service providers. Disabil Rehabil. Forthcoming. [cited 2016 Sep 26].
  • World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
  • Whiteneck G, Dijkers MP. Difficult to measure constructs: conceptual and methodological issues concerning participation and environmental factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:S22–S35.
  • Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, et al. Environmental barriers and supports to everyday participation: a qualitative insider perspective from people with disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:578–588.
  • Post MWM, Kirchberger I, Scheuringer M, et al. Outcome parameters in spinal cord injury research: a systematic review using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a reference. Spinal Cord. 2010;48:522–528.
  • Noreau L, Boschen K. Intersection of participation and environmental factors: a complex interactive process. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:S44–S53.
  • Reinhardt J, Post M. Measurement and evidence of environmental determinants of participation in spinal cord injury: a systematic review of the literature. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2010;15:26–48.
  • Ripat JD, Woodgate RL. Self-perceived participation among adults with spinal cord injury: a grounded theory study. Spinal Cord. 2012;50:908–914.
  • Lysack C, Komanecky M, Kabel A, et al. Environmental factors and their role in community integration after spinal cord injury. Can J Occup Ther. 2007;74:243–254.
  • Whiteneck G, Meade MA, Dijkers M, et al. Environmental factors and their role in participation and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1793–1803.
  • Dijkers MPJM, Yavuzer G, Ergin S, et al. A tale of two countries: environmental impacts on social participation after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2002;40:351.
  • Jellema S, van der Sande R, van Hees S, et al. Role of environmental factors on resuming valued activities poststroke: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative findings. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97:991–1002.
  • Barclay L, McDonald R, Lentin P, et al. Facilitators and barriers to social and community participation following spinal cord injury. Aust Occup Ther J. 2016;63:19–28.
  • Leung FH, Savithiri R. Spotlight on focus groups. Can Fam Physician. 2009;55:218–219.
  • Gill P, Stewart K, Treasure E, et al. Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups. Br Dent J. 2008;204:291–295.
  • Ong PH, Koh GCH. Caregiver factors in stroke: are they the missing piece of the puzzle?. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97:1223–1225.
  • Yeoh BS, Huang S. Foreign domestic workers and home-based care for elders in Singapore. J Aging Soc Policy. 2010;22:69–88.
  • Judd T, DeBoard R. Community-based neuropsychological rehabilitation in the cosmopolitan setting. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2009;19:841–866.
  • Velema JP, Cornielje H. Reflect before you act: providing structure to the evaluation of rehabilitation programmes. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:1252–1264.
  • Peiris-John RJ, Attanayake S, Daskon L, et al. Disability studies in Sri Lanka: priorities for action. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:1742–1748.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.