References
- World Health Organization. International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps: a manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 1980.
- Bellon K, Wright J, Jamison L, et al. Disability Rating Scale. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2012;27:449–451.
- Shukla D, Devi BI, Agrawal A. Outcome measures for traumatic brain injury. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2011;113:435–441.
- Rappaport M, Hall KM, Hopkins HK, et al. Disability rating scale for severe head trauma: coma to community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982;63:118–123.
- Gouvier WD, Blanton PD, LaPorte KK, et al. Reliability and validity of the Disability Rating Scale and the levels of cognitive functioning scale in monitoring recovery from severe head injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;68:94–97.
- Novack TA, Bergquist TF, Bennett MA, et al. Primary caregiver distress following severe head injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1991;6:69–77.
- Hall K, Cope N, Rappaport M. Glasgow Outcome Scale and Disability Rating Scale: comparative usefulness in following recovery in traumatic head injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985;66:35–37.
- Eliason MR, Topp BW. Predictive validity of Rappaport's Disability Rating Scale in subjects with acute brain dysfunction. Phys Ther. 1984;64:1357–1360.
- Hall KM, Hamilton BB, Gordon WA, et al. Characteristics and comparisons of functional assessment indices: Disability Rating Scale, Functional Independence Measure, and Functional Assessment Measure. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1993;8:60–74.
- Malec JF, Hammond FM, Giacino JT, et al. Structured interview to improve the reliability and psychometric integrity of the Disability Rating Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:1603–1608.
- Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, et al. The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil. 1987;1:6–18.
- Corrigan JD, Smith-Knapp K, Granger CV. Validity of the functional independence measure for persons with traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:828–834.
- Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y, Granger CV, et al. The reliability of the functional independence measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:1226–1232.
- Urbaniak GC, Plous S. Research Randomizer (Version 4.0) [Computer software]. 2013 [cited 2016 Oct 15]. Available from: http://www.randomizer.org/
- Jolliffe IT. Principal component analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.; 2002.
- Jackson DL, Gillaspy JA, Purc-Stephenson R. Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations. Psychol Methods. 2009;14:6–23.
- Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Model. 1999;6:1–55.
- MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol Methods. 1996;1:130–149.
- Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 3rd ed. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers; 1996.
- Laxe S, Tschiesner U, Zasler N, et al. What domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health are covered by the most commonly used measurement instruments in traumatic brain injury research? Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012;114:645–650.
- Tate RL. A compendium of tests, scales, and questionnaires: the practitioner's guide to measuring outcomes after acquired brain impairment. Hove (UK): Psychology Press; 2010.
- Tate RL, Godbee K, Sigmundsdottir L. A systematic review of assessment tools for adults used in traumatic brain injury research and their relationship to the ICF. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;32:729–750.
- MacCallum RC, Widaman KF, Preacher KJ, et al. Sample size in factor analysis: the role of model error. Multivariate Behav Res. 2001;36:611–637.
- Hayton JC, Allen DG, Scarpello V. Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: a tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Res Methods. 2004;7:191–205.
- Henson RK, Robers JK. Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educ Psychol Meas. 2006;66:393–416.
- Krellman JW, Kolakowsky-Hayner SA, Spielman L, et al. Predictors of follow-up completeness in longitudinal research on traumatic brain injury: findings from the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research traumatic brain injury model systems program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:633–641.
- Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems National Data and Statistical Center [Internet]. 105a Guidelines and strategies for maximizing follow-up [cited 2017 Aug 31]. Available from: http://www.tbindsc.org/SOP.aspx.