Participation restrictions among adolescents and adults with neonatal brachial plexus palsy: the patient perspective

References

• Pondaag W, Malessy MJ, van Dijk JG, et al. Natural history of obstetric brachial plexus palsy: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2004;46:138–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeksma AF, Wolf H, Oei SL. Obstetrical brachial plexus injuries: incidence, natural course and shoulder contracture. Clin Rehabil. 2000;14:523–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan SP, Blackwell SB, Ananth CV. Neonatal brachial plexus palsy: incidence, prevalence, and temporal trends. Semin Perinatol. 2014;38:210–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. ICF 2016; [cited 2016 Jul 01]. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert A, Pivato G, Kheiralla T. Long-term results of primary repair of brachial plexus lesions in children. Microsurgery. 2006;26:334–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pondaag W, Malessy MJ. The evidence for nerve repair in obstetric brachial plexus palsy revisited. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:434619.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hale HB, Bae DS, Waters PM. Current concepts in the management of brachial plexus birth palsy. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35:322–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters PM. Update on management of pediatric brachial plexus palsy. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2005;14:233–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagerkvist AL, Johansson U, Johansson A, et al. Obstetric brachial plexus palsy: a prospective, population-based study of incidence, recovery, and residual impairment at 18 months of age. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52:529–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arzillo S, Gishen K, Askari M. Brachial plexus injury: treatment options and outcomes. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25:1200–1206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thatte MR, Mehta R. Obstetric brachial plexus injury. Indian J Plast Surg. 2011;44:380–389.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sarac C, Duijnisveld BJ, van der Weide A, et al. Outcome measures used in clinical studies on neonatal brachial plexus palsy: a systematic literature review using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. PRM. 2015;8:167–185. quiz 85–86.
   Google Scholar
• Gjorup L. Obstetrical lesion of the brachial plexus. Acta Neurol Scand. 1966;42:Suppl. 18:1–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Heer C, Beckerman H, Groot V. Explaining daily functioning in young adults with obstetric brachial plexus lesion. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:1455–1461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partridge C, Edwards S. Obstetric brachial plexus palsy: increasing disability and exacerbation of symptoms with age. Physiother Res Int. 2004;9:157–163.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirjavainen MO, Remes VM, Peltonen J, et al. Permanent brachial plexus birth palsy does not impair the development and function of the spine and lower limbs. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2009;18:283–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarac C, Bastiaansen E, Van der Holst M, et al. Concepts of functioning and health important to children with an obstetric brachial plexus injury: a qualitative study using focus groups. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013;55:1136–1142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strombeck C, Fernell E. Aspects of activities and participation in daily life related to body structure and function in adolescents with obstetrical brachial plexus palsy: a descriptive follow-up study. Acta Paediatr. 2003;92:740–746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mader L, Post MW, Ballert CS, et al. Metric properties of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation (USER-Participation) in persons with spinal cord injury living in Switzerland. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48:165–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig A, Nicholson Perry K, Guest R, et al. Adjustment following chronic spinal cord injury: determining factors that contribute to social participation. Br J Health Psychol. 2015;20:807–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donkervoort M, Roebroeck M, Wiegerink D, et al. Determinants of functioning of adolescents and young adults with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:453–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Meeteren J, Roebroeck ME, Celen E, et al. Functional activities of the upper extremity of young adults with cerebral palsy: a limiting factor for participation? Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:387–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Videler AJ, Beelen A, van Schaik IN, et al. Limited upper limb functioning has impact on restrictions in participation and autonomy of patients with hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy 1a. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:746–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Holst M, van der Wal CW, Wolterbeek R, et al. Outcome of secondary shoulder surgery in children with neonatal brachial plexus palsy with and without nerve surgery treatment history: a long-term follow-up study. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48:609–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Epidemiology. 2007;18:800–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardol M, de Haan RJ, van den Bos GA, et al. The development of a handicap assessment questionnaire: the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA). Clin Rehabil. 1999;13:411–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardol M, de Haan RJ, de Jong BA, et al. Psychometric properties of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:210–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardol M, Beelen A, van den Bos GA, et al. Responsiveness of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:1524–1529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post MW, van der Zee CH, Hennink J, et al. Validity of the Utrecht scale for evaluation of rehabilitation-participation. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:478–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaronson NK, Muller M, Cohen PD, et al. Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1055–1068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware J. SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide. Boston (MA): The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• VanderZee KI, Sanderman R, Heyink JW, et al. Psychometric qualities of the RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0: a multidimensional measure of general health status. Int J Behav Med. 1996;3:104–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JEKM, Keller SD. SF-36 physical and mental summary scales: a user’s manual. 2nd ed. Boston (MA): The Health Institute; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Veehof MM, Sleegers EJ, van Veldhoven NH, et al. Psychometric qualities of the Dutch language version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH-DLV). J Hand Ther. 2002;15:347–354.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hunsaker FG, Cioffi DA, Amadio PC, et al. The American academy of orthopaedic surgeons outcomes instruments: normative values from the general population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A:208–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wason JM, Stecher L, Mander AP. Correcting for multiple-testing in multi-arm trials: is it necessary and is it done? Trials. 2014;15:364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centraal Bureau voor Statistiek (Netherlands Statistics C. Bevolking; hoogst behaald onderwijsniveau; geslacht, leeftijd en herkomst [Internet]. Centraal Bureau voor Statistiek (Netherlands Statistics, CBS); 2016; [cited 2016 Nov 29]. Available from: http://statline.cbs.nl/Statweb/publication/?DM=SLNL&PA=82275NED&D1=0&D2=0&D3=0&D4=0-1,4-5&D5=0-1,7,11&D6=60-63,65-67&VW=T
   Google Scholar
• Yang LJ, Anand P, Birch R. Limb preference in children with obstetric brachial plexus palsy. Pediatr Neurol. 2005;33:46–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar