Work, organisational practices, and margin of manoeuver during work reintegration

References

• Mital A, Shrey DE, Govindaraju M, et al. Accelerating the return to work (RTW) chances of coronary heart disease (CHD) patients: part 1 – development and validation of a training programme. Disabil Rehabil. 2000;22:604–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rost K, Smith GR. Return to work after an initial myocardial infarction and subsequent emotional distress. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:381–385.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Picard MH, Dennis C, Schwartz RG, et al. Cost-benefit analysis of early return to work after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1989;63:1308–1314.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Osler M, Martensson S, Prescott E, et al. Impact of gender, co-morbidity and social factors on labour market affiliation after first admission for acute coronary syndrome. A cohort study of Danish patients 2001–2009. PLoS One. 2014;9:e86758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soderman E, Lisspers J, Sundin O. Depression as a predictor of return to work in patients with coronary artery disease. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56:193–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varaillac P, Sellier P, Iliou MC, et al. [Return to work following myocardial infarction. Medical and socio- professional factors]. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1996;89:203–229.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abbott J, Berry N. Return to work during the year following first myocardial infarction. Br J Clin Psychol. 1991;30:268–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aboa-Eboule C, Brisson C, Maunsell E, et al. Job strain and risk of acute recurrent coronary heart disease events. JAMA. 2007;298:1652–1660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hlatky MA, Haney T, Barefoot JC, et al. Medical, psychological and social correlates of work disability among men with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1986;58:911–915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark DB, Lam LC, Lee KL, et al. Effects of coronary angioplasty, coronary bypass surgery, and medical therapy on employment in patients with coronary artery disease. A prospective comparison study. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:111–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hlatky MA, Boothroyd D, Horine S, et al. Employment after coronary angioplasty or coronary bypass surgery in patients employed at the time of revascularization. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:543–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soejima Y, Steptoe A, Nozoe S, et al. Psychosocial and clinical factors predicting resumption of work following acute myocardial infarction in Japanese men. Int J Cardiol. 1999;72:39–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeland JG, Havik OE. Psychological predictors for return to work after a myocardial infarction. J Psychosom Res. 1987;31:471–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudrez H, De Backer G, Comhaire B. Return to work after myocardial infarction: results of a longitudinal population based study. Eur Hear J. 1994;15:32–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Hagan FT, Thomas SG. Work adjustment in cardiovascular illness: job characteristics and social support. J Cadiopulmonary Rehabil Prev. 2011;31:358–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hagan FT, Coutu MFF, Thomas SG, et al. Medical and rehabilitation influences on work reintegration in cardiovascular disease. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22:270–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fougeyrollas P, Beauregard L. An interactive person-environment social creation. In: Albrecht GL, Seelman KD, Bury M, editors. Handbook of disability studies. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2001. p. 171–193.
   Google Scholar
• Durand MJ, Vezina N, Baril R, et al. Margin of manoeuvre indicators in the workplace during the rehabilitation process: a qualitative analysis. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19:194–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand MJ, Vézina N, Baril R, et al. Relationship between the margin of manoeuvre and the return to work after a long-term absence due to a musculoskeletal disorder: an exploratory study. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:1245–1252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashkow FJ, Dafoe W. Clinical cardiac rehabilitation: a cardiologist’s guide. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann M, Sheldahl L, Tristani F, Wilke N. Returning the patient to work. In: Pollock ML, Schmidt DH, editors. Heart disease and rehabilitation. Vol. 3. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics; 1995. p. 405–421.
   Google Scholar
• Aboa-Eboulé C, Brisson C, Maunsell E, et al. Job strain and risk of acute recurrent coronary heart disease events. JAMA. 2007;298:1652–1660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw WS, Kristman VL, Vezina N. Workplace issues. In: Loisel P, Anema JR, editors. Handbook of work disability: prevention and management. New York (NY): Springer Science and Business Media; 2013. p. 163–182.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hagan FT, Ballantyne PJ, Vienneau P. Mental health status of Ontario injured workers with permanent impairments. Can J Public Heal. 2012;103:303–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Danermark B. Explaining society: critical realism in the social sciences. London; New York (NY): Routledge; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. London; Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Liamputtong P, Ezzy D. In depth interviews. In: Liamputtong P, Ezzy D, editors. Qualitative research methods. Victoria (AU): Oxford; 2005. p. 54–73.
   Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne DE. Validity issues in narrative research. Qual Inq. 2007;13:471–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International QSR. NVivo7 Software. Japan: QSR international Japan K.K.; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Walker D, Myrick F. Grounded theory: an exploration of process and procedure. Qual Health Res. 2006;16:547–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauthner N, Doucet A. Reflections on a voice-centred relational method. In: Ribbens J, Edwards R, editors. Feminist dilemmas in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 1998. p. 119–145.
   Google Scholar
• Seale C. The quality of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Sykes DH, Hanley M, Boyle DM, et al. Work strain and the post-discharge adjustment of patients following a heart attack. Psychol Health. 2000;15:609–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause N, Dasinger LK, Deegan LJ, et al. Psychosocial job factors and return-to-work after compensated low back injury: a disability phase-specific analysis. Am J Ind Med. 2001;40:374–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner S. The future of work in North America: good jobs, bad jobs, beyond jobs. Futures. 1994;26:185–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapido D, Mankelow R, Burchell B. Working like a dog, sick as a dog: job intensification in the late 20th century. In: Burchell B, Deakin S, Michie J, et al., editors. Systems of production: markets, organizations and performance. London: Routledge; 2003. p. 89–103.
   Google Scholar
• Amick BC, Smith MJ. Stress, computer-based work monitoring and measurement systems: a conceptual overview. Appl Ergon. 1992;23:6–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landsbergis P, Travis A, Schnall P. Working conditions and masked hypertension. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2013;20:69–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collins SM, Karasek RA, Costas K. Job strain and autonomic indices of cardiovascular disease risk. Am J Ind Med. 2005;48:182–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franche RL, Cullen K, Clarke J, et al. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:607–631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompa E, de Oliveira C, Dolinschi R, et al. systematic review of disability management interventions with economic evaluations. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18:16–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loisel P, Durand MJ. Worker accommodation, clinical intervention and return to work. In: Sullivan T, Frank J, editors. Preventing and managing disability at work. London, Ontario, Canada: Taylor & Francis; 2003. p. 57–73.
   Google Scholar
• MacEachen E, Clarke J, Franche RLL, et al. Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32:257–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarasuk V, Eakin JM. The problem of legitimacy in the experience of work-related back injury. Qual Health Res. 1995;5:204–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dembe AE. The social consequences of occupational injuries and illnesses. Am J Ind Med. 2001;40:403–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand MJ, Vezina N, Richard MC. Concept of margin of manoeuvre in return to work. In: Schultz I, Gatchel RJ, editors. Handbook of return to work. New York (NY): Springer; 2016. p. 53–65.
   Google Scholar
• Habeck RV, Hunt HA, Van Tol B. Workplace factors associated with peventing and managing work disability. Rehabil Couns Bull. 1998;42:98–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habeck RV, Scully SM, VanTol B, et al. Successful employer strategies for preventing and managing disability. Rehabil Couns Bull. 1998;42:144–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amick BC, Habeck RV, Hunt A, et al. Measuring the impact of organizational behaviors on work disability prevention and management. J Occup Rehabil. 2000;10:21–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar