Barriers and facilitators to meeting aphasia guideline recommendations: what factors influence speech pathologists’ practice?

References

• Field MJ, Lohr KN, editors. Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. Institute of Medicine. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Woolf S, Schünemann HJ, Eccles MP, et al. Developing clinical practice guidelines: types of evidence and outcomes; values and economics, synthesis, grading, and presentation and deriving recommendations. Implement Sci. 2012;7:61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham I. Defining knowledge translation. CMAJ. 2009;181:165–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrubsole K, Worrall L, Power E, et al. Recommendations for post-stroke aphasia rehabilitation: an updated systematic review and evaluation of clinical practice guidelines. Aphasiology. 2016;31:1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrubsole K, Worrall L, Power E, et al. Priorities for closing the evidence-practice gaps in post-stroke aphasia rehabilitation: a scoping review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;S0003–9993:31083.
   Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. Clinical guidelines for stroke management 2010. Melbourne, Australia: National Stroke Foundation; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Godecke E, Hird K, Lalor EE, et al. Very early poststroke aphasia therapy: a pilot randomized controlled efficacy trial. Int J Stroke. 2011;7:635–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard IJ, Harris D, Kilkenny MF, et al. Adherence to clinical guidelines improves patient outcomes in Australian audit of stroke rehabilitation practice. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:965–971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas LH, Cullum N, McColl E, et al. Guidelines in professions allied to medicine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 1999;CD000349.
   Google Scholar
• Baker R, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Gillies C, et al. Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;CD005470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006;26:13–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grol R, Wensing M. What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice. Med J Aust. 2004;180(6):S57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker R, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Gillies C, et al. Tailored interventions to address identified determinants of practice. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;CD005470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis JJ, O’Connor D, Curran J. Theories of behaviour change synthesised into a set of theoretical groupings: introducing a thematic series on the theoretical domains framework. Implement Sci. 2012;7:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao M, Power E, O’Halloran R. Factors affecting speech pathologists’ implementation of stroke management guidelines: a thematic analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:674–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadely KA, Power E, O’Halloran R. Speech pathologists’ experiences with stroke clinical practice guidelines and the barriers and facilitators influencing their use: a national descriptive study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose M, Ferguson A, Power E, et al. Aphasia rehabilitation in Australia: current practices, challenges and future directions. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013;16:169–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster AM, Worrall LE, Rose ML, et al. ‘I do the best I can’: an in-depth exploration of the aphasia management pathway in the acute hospital setting. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38: 1765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons‐Mackie NN, Kagan A, O’Neill Christie C, et al. Communicative access and decision making for people with aphasia: implementing sustainable healthcare systems change. Aphasiology. 2007;21:39–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lugtenberg M, Zegers-van Schaick JM, Westert GP, et al. Why don’t physicians adhere to guideline recommendations in practice? An analysis of barriers among Dutch general practitioners. Implement Sci. 2009;4:54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM, Johnston M, et al. Applying psychological theories to evidence-based clinical practice: identifying factors predictive of managing upper respiratory tract infections without antibiotics. Implement Sci. 2007;2:26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Walker A, et al. Changing the behavior of healthcare professionals: the use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:107–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estabrooks CA, Thompson DS, Lovely JJ, et al. A guide to knowledge translation theory. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006;26:25–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, et al. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:26–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new medical research council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337: a1655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy K, O’Connor DA, Browning CJ, et al. Understanding diagnosis and management of dementia and guideline implementation in general practice: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework. Implement Sci. 2014;9:31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander K, Brijnath B, Mazza D. Barriers and enablers to delivery of the healthy kids check: an analysis informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B model. Implement Sci. 2014;9:60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavender EJ, Bosch M, Gruen RL, et al. Developing a targeted, theory-informed implementation intervention using two theoretical frameworks to address health professional and organisational factors: a case study to improve the management of mild traumatic brain injury in the emergency department. Implement Sci. 2015;10:74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French SD, Green SE, O’Connor DA, et al. Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Implement Sci. 2012;7:38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. National stroke audit -acute services report 2015. Melbourne, Australia: National Stroke Foundation; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough: an experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18:59–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QSR International Pty Ltd. Melbourne, Australia: NVivo data analysis Software; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Buetow S. Thematic analysis and its reconceptualization as ‘saliency analysis’. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2010;15:123–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power E, Godecke E, O’Halloran R, et al. Very early aphasia screening and therapy: a knowledge transfer and exchange plan. Richmond: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny B, Lincoln M. Sport, scales, or war? Metaphors speech-language pathologists use to describe caseload management. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012;14:247–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor S, Pettigrew C. The barriers perceived to prevent the successful implementation of evidence-based practice by speech and language therapists. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2009;44:1018–1035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klippi A, Sellman J, Heikkinen P, et al. Current clinical practices in aphasia therapy in Finland: challenges in moving towards national best practice. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2012;64:169–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byng S, Cairns D, Duchan J. Values in practice and practising values. J Commun Disord. 2002;35:89–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greener J, Grant A. Beliefs about effectiveness of treatment for aphasia after stroke. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 1998;33:162–3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lynch EA, Cadilhac DA, Luker JA, et al. Education-only versus a multifaceted intervention for improving assessment of rehabilitation needs after stroke a cluster randomised trial. Implement Sci. 2016;11:120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCluskey A, Vratsistas-Curto A, Schurr K. Barriers and enablers to implementing multiple stroke guideline recommendations: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:323–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas E, Power E, Worrall L, et al. A national approach to improving aphasia services: application of a knowledge transfer and exchange framework. J Clin Pract Speech Lang Pathol. 2014;16:30–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Power E, Thomas E, Worrall L, et al. Development and validation of Australian aphasia rehabilitation best practice statements using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. BMJ Open. 2015;5:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar