Rehabilitees perspective on goal setting in rehabilitation – a phenomenological approach

References

• Brown M, Levack W, McPherson KM, et al. Survival, momentum, and things that make me “me”: patients’ perceptions of goal setting after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:1020–1026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosewilliam S, Roskell CA, Pandyan A. A systematic review and synthesis of the quantitative and qualitative evidence behind patient-centred goal setting in stroke rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2011;25:501–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver K, Halbert J, Stewart M, et al. Patient readiness and ability to set recovery goals during the first 6 months after srtoke. J Allied Health. 2010;39:e149–154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bovend'Eerdt TJ, Botell RE, Wade DT. Writing SMART rehabilitation goals and achieving goal attainment scaling: a practical guide. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23:352–361.
   Google Scholar
• Sugavanam T, Mead G, Bulley C, et al. The effects and experiences of goal setting in stroke rehabilitation – a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:177–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Cott C. Client-centeret rehabilitation: client perspectives. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:1411–1422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottone R. A systematic theory of vocational rehabilitation. Rehabil Couns Bull. 1987;30:167–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terveysministeriö S-JA. Kuntoutuksen tutkimuksen kehittämisohjelma. [Development programme for rehabilitation research.]. Helsinki: Publications of the Ministry of Social Affairs ans Health; 2004. p. 70. Finnish.
   Google Scholar
• Wade DT. Goal setting in rehabilitation: an overview of what, why and how. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23:291–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Playford ED, Siegert R, Levack W, et al. Areas of consensus and controversy about goal setting in rehabilitation: a conference report. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23:334–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:1087–1110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacristan JA. Patient-centered medicine and patient-oriented research: improving health outcomes for individual patients. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13:6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levack WMM, Weatherall M, Hay-Smith EJ, et al. Goal setting and strategies to enhance goal pursuit for adults with acquired disability participating in rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2016;52:400–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National clinical guideline for stroke. R Coll Physicians. 2012;232:1–89. Available from: http://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/sites/default/files/national-clinical-guidelines-for-stroke-fourth-edition.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Valtioneuvoston Kuntoutusselonteko Eduskunnalle. Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö. 2002. Report on Social Affairs and Health 2002. Helsinki: Publications of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health; 2002. Finnish.
   Google Scholar
• Härkäpää K, Järvikoski A, Gould R. Asikaslähtöisyys, tiedonsaanti ja tuki kuntoutusprosessiessa [Customer orientation, access to information and support in the rehabilitation process]. In: Järvikoski A, Lindh J, Suikkanen A Toim, editors. Kuntoutus muutoksessa [Rehabilitation in change]. Rovaniemi: Lapland University Press; 2011. p. 73–75.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd A, Roberts AR, Freeman JA. “Finding a balance” in involving patients in goal setting early after stroke: a physiotherapy perspective. Physiother Res Int. 2014;19:147–157.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brinkmann S, Kvale S. Interviews learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. 3rd ed. USA: SAGE; 2015. p. 25–54.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegelberg H. The essentials of the phenomenological method. The phenomenological movement: a historical introduction. 3rd revised and enlarged ed. Hague, The Netherlands: Martinius Nijhoff; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Bovend’Eerdt TJ, Botell RE, Wade DT. Writing SMART rehabilitation goals and achieving goal attainment scaling: a practical guide. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23:352–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiegelberg H. Doing phenomenology: essays on and in phenomenology. Hague, The Netherlands: Martinius Nijhoff; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Piirainen A. Asiakkaan ja asiantuntijan pedagoginen suhde. Fenomenologinen tutkimus fysioterapiatilanteista asiakkaiden ja fysioterapeuttien kokemana [Dissertation: The pedagogical relationship between the customer and the expert. Phenomenological study of physiotherapy situations experienced by clients and physiotherapists]. Helsinki: University of Helsinki; 2006. Finnish.
   Google Scholar
• Wottrich AW, Stenström CH, Engardt M, et al. Characteristics of physiotherapy sessions from the patient’s and therapist’s perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:1198–1205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holliday RC, Cano S, Freeman JA, et al. Should patients participate in clinical decision making? An optimised balance block design controlled study of goal setting in a rehabilitation unit. J Neurol Psychiatry. 2007;78:576–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holliday RC, Ballinger C, Playford ED. Goal setting in neurological rehabilitation: patients perspectives. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:389–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karhila P, Kettunen T, Poskiparta M, et al. Negotiation in type 2 diabetes counseling: from problem recognition to mutual acceptance during lifestyle counseling. Qual Health Res. 2003;13:1205–1224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glazier SR, Schuman J, Keltz E, et al. Taking the next steps in goal ascertainment: a perspective study of patient, team, and family perspectives using a comprehensive standardized menu in a geriatric assessment and treatment unit. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52:284–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proot IM, Crebolder HFJM, Abu-Saad HH, et al. Stroke patients needs and experiences regarding autonomy at discharge from nursing home. Patient Educ Couns. 2000;41:275–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, et al. What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:1445–1460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Classification of chronic pain. Descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. Prepared by the International Association for the Study of Pain, Subcommittee on Taxonomy. Pain Suppl 1986;3:S1–S226.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Souza L, Oliver Frank A. Patients experiences of the impact of chronic back pain on family life and work. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:310–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, et al. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006;10:287–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojala T, Häkkinen A, Karppinen J, et al. Chronic pain affects the whole person-a phenomenological study. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:363–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuki T, Kudo M. Factors related to continuation of health behaviours among stroke survivors. J Jpn Phys Ther Assoc. 2011;14:1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rochette A, Tribble DS-C, Desrosiers J, et al. Adaptation and coping following a first stroke: a qualitative analysis of a phenomenological orientation. Int J Rehabil Res. 2006;29:247–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criterio for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32- item checklist for interviews and focus group. Int J Qual Heal Care. 2007;19:349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar