Ankle positions potentially facilitating greater maximal contraction of pelvic floor muscles: a systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• Ashton-Miller DH, John OL, Delancey J. The functional anatomy of the female pelvic floor and stress continence control system. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2001;35:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Dompeyre P, Fritel X, Fauconnier A, et al. [Pelvic floor muscle contraction and maximum urethral closure pressure]. Prog Urol. 2015;25:200–205. French.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapsford RR, Richardson CA, Stanton WR. Sitting posture affects pelvic floor muscle activity in parous women: an observational study. Aust J Physiother. 2006;52:219–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chmielewska D, Stania M, Sobota G, et al. Impact of different body positions on bioelectrical activity of the pelvic floor muscles in nulliparous continent women. BioMed Res Int. 2015;2015:905897.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Capson AC, Nashed J, McLean L. The role of lumbopelvic posture in pelvic floor muscle activation in continent women. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2011;21:166–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruno P. The use of “ stabilization exercises”to affect neuromuscular control in the lumbopelvic region: a narrative review.” J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2014;58:119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee M, Song C, Jo Y, et al. The effects of core muscle release technique on lumbar spine deformation and low back pain. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27:1519–1522.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kweon M, Hong S, Jang GU, et al. The neural control of spinal stability muscles during different respiratory patterns. J Phys Ther Sci. 2013;25:1421–1424.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hodges P, Sapsford R, Pengel L. Postural and respiratory functions of the pelvic floor muscles. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26:362–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerroto M, Vedovi E, Rossi S, et al. The effect of ankle inclination in supine and standing position on the electromyigraphic activity of abdominal and pelvic floor muscles in women with and without stress urinary incontinence: preliminary results from a pilot study. Eur Urol. 2008;7:145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerruto MA, Vedovi E, Dalla Riva S, et al. The effect of ankle inclination in upright position on the electromyigraphic activity of pelvic floor muscles in women with stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2007;6:102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CH, Huang MH, Chen TW, et al. Relationship between ankle position and pelvic floor muscle activity in female stress urinary incontinence. Urology. 2005;66:288–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen HL, Lin YC, Chien WJ, et al. The effect of ankle position on pelvic floor muscle contraction activity in women. J Urol. 2009;181:1217–1223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Shamy FF, Moharm AA. Effect of pelvic postural changes on pelvic floor muscle activity in women with urinary stress incontinence. Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy. 2013;18.
   Google Scholar
• Ebbeling CJ, Hamill J, Crussemeyer JA. Lower extremity mechanics and energy cost of walking in high-heeled shoes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994;19:190–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esenyel M, Walsh K, Walden JG, et al. Kinetics of high-heeled gait. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2003;93:27–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Oliveira Pezzan PA, João SMA, Ribeiro AP, et al. Postural assessment of lumbar lordosis and pelvic alignment angles in adolescent users and nonusers of high-heeled shoes. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2011;34:614–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasser J, Mello S, Ávila A, editors. Análise do impulso em calçados femininos em diferentes alturas de salto. Anais do VII Congresso Brasileiro de Biomecânica[Analysis of the impulse in women's shoes at different heights. Proceedings of the VII Brazilian Congress of Biomechanics]; 1999. Portugese.
   Google Scholar
• Snow RE, Williams KR. High heeled shoes: their effect on center of mass position, posture, three-dimensional kinematics, rearfoot motion, and ground reaction forces. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:568–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendix T, SØrensen SS, Klausen K. Lumbar curve, trunk muscles, and line of gravity with different heel heights. Spine. 1984;9:223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opila KA, Wagner SS, Schiowitz S, et al. Postural alignment in barefoot and high-heeled stance. Spine. 1988;13:542–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opila-Correia K. Kinematics of high-heeled gait. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990;71:304–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell BS, Muhlenkamp KA, Hoiriis KT, et al. Measurement of lumbar lordosis in static standing posture with and without high-heeled shoes. J Chiropr Med. 2012;11:145–153.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daley DJ, Myint PK, Gray RJ, et al. Systematic review on factors associated with medication non-adherence in Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2012;18:1053–1061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt G, Oxman A, Vist G, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, et al. GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence-study limitations (risk of bias)). J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:407–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence-inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1294–1302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence-indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1303–1310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence-imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1283–1293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V, et al. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence-publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1277–1282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5:13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins J, et al. A basic introduction to fixed‐effect and random‐effects models for meta‐analysis. Res Synth Method. 2010;1:97–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zubieta M, Carr RL, Drake MJ, et al. Influence of voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction and pelvic floor muscle training on urethral closure pressures: a systematic literature review. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:687–696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messelink B, Benson T, Berghmans B, et al. Standardization of terminology of pelvic floor muscle function and dysfunction: report from the pelvic floor clinical assessment group of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2005;24:374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halski T, Słupska L, Dymarek R, et al. Evaluation of bioelectrical activity of pelvic floor muscles and synergistic muscles depending on orientation of pelvis in menopausal women with symptoms of stress urinary incontinence: a preliminary observational study. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:274938.
   Google Scholar
• Yang SH, Huang WC, Yang SY, et al. Validation of new ultrasound parameters for quantifying pelvic floor muscle contraction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:465–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isherwood P, Rane A. Comparative assessment of pelvic floor strength using a perineometer and digital examination. BJOG. 2000;107:1007–1011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bø K, Finckenhagen HB. Vaginal palpation of pelvic floor muscle strength: Inter‐test reproducibility and comparison between palpation and vaginal squeeze pressure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80:883–887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peschers U, Gingelmaier A, Jundt K, et al. Evaluation of pelvic floor muscle strength using four different techniques. Int Urogynecol J. 2001;12:27–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bø K. Urinary incontinence, pelvic floor dysfunction, exercise and sport. Sports Med. 2004;34:451–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig I, Luginbuehl H, Radlinger L. Reliability of pelvic floor muscle electromyography tested on healthy women and women with pelvic floor muscle dysfunction. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;60:382–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller JM, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. Quantification of cough-related urine loss using the paper towel test. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91:705–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller JM, Ashton‐Miller JA, DeLancey JO. A pelvic muscle precontraction can reduce cough-related urine loss in selected women with mild SUI. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998;46:870–874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar