Identification of categories of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in functional assessment measures for stroke survivors: a systematic review

References

• Murray CJL, Lopez AD, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2197–2223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox AM, McKevitt C, Rudd AG. Socioeconomic status and stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:181–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langagergaard V, Palnum KH, Mehnert F, et al. Socioeconomic differences in quality of care and clinical outcome after stroke: a nationwide population-based study. Stroke. 2011;42:2896–2902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barreca S, Wolf SL, Fasoli S, et al. Treatment interventions for the paretic upper limb of stroke survivors: A critical review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003;17:220–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates JS, Lai SM, Duncan PW, et al. Falls in community-dwelling stroke survivors: An accumulated impairments model. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002;39:385–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaracz K, Kouzubski W. Quality of life in stroke patients. Acta Neurol Scand. 2003;107:324–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva SM, Corrêa FI, Faria CDCM, et al. Evaluation of post-stroke functionality based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: a proposal for use of assessment tools. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27:1665–1670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barak S, Duncan PW. Issues in selecting outcome measures to assess functional recovery after stroke. NeuroRx. 2006;3:505–524.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R, et al. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF activity. Disabil. Rehabil. 2005;27:315–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tempest S, McIntyre A. Using the ICF to clarify team roles and demonstrate clinical reasoning in stroke rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:663–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geyh S, Cieza A, Schouten J, et al. ICF Core Sets for stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2004;44:135–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R, et al. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF Body Functions. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:191–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R, et al. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF Participation. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:507–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geyh S, Cieza A, Kollerits B, et al. Content comparison of health-related quality of life measures used in stroke based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF): a systematic review. Quality of Life Research. 2007;16:833–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira-salmela LF, Neto MG, Magalhães LC, et al. Content comparisons of Stroke Specific Quality of Life upon the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Quality of Life Research. 2009;18:765–773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Stucki G. Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Quality of Life Research. 2005;14:1225–1237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Ustün B, Stucki G. ICF Linking Rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37:212–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, et al. Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J Rehabil Med. 2002;34:205–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Fayed N, Bickenbach J, et al. Refinements of the ICF Linking Rules to strengthen their potential for establishing comparability of health information. Disabil Rehabil. 2016. DOI:10.3109/09638288.2016.1145258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grill E, Stucki G, Scheuringer M, et al. Validation of International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) Core Sets for Early Pstacute Rehabilitation Facilities: Comparisons with Three Other Functional Measures. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;85:640–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schepers VP, Ketelaar M, et al. Comparing contents of functional outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation usingthe International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:221–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velstra IM, Ballert CS, Cieza A. A systematic literature review of outcome measures for upper extremity function using the international classification of functioning, disability, and health as reference. PM&R. 2011;3:846–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler F, Connolly C, Sakaria A, et al. Can the ICF be used as a rehabilitation outcome measure? A study looking at the inter-and intra-rater reliability of ICF categories derived from an ADL assessment tool. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45:881–887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prodinger B1, O'Connor RJ, Stucki G, et al. Establishing score equivalence of the Functional Independence Measure motor scale and the Barthel Index, utilising the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and Rasch measurement theory. J Rehabil Med. 2017;49:416–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berzina G, Sveen U, Paanalahti M, et al. Analyzing the modified Rankin scale using concepts of the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2016;52:203–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riberto M, Miyazaki MH, Jucá SSH, et al. Validação da versão brasileira da medida de independência funcional. Acta Fisiatr. 2004;11:72–76.
   Google Scholar
• Minosso JSM, Amendola F, Alvarenga MRM, et al. Validação, no Brasil, do Índice de Barthel em idosos atendidos em ambulatórios. Acta Paul Enferm. 2010;23:218–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed "up & go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39:142–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln N, Leadbitter D. Assessment of Motor Function in Stroke Patients. Physiother. 1979;65:48–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Banks JL, Marotta CA: Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature review and synthesis. Stroke. 2007;38:1091–1096.
   Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Lannin NA, Borschmann K, et al. Standardized measurement of sensorimotor recovery in stroke trials: Consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. Int J Stroke. 2017; 12:451–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baggio JA, Santos-Pontelli TE, Cougo-Pinto PT, et al. Validation of a structured interview for telephone assessment of the modified Rankin Scale in Brazilian stroke patients. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;38:297–301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar