Attitudes toward guardianship, social work goals, and perspectives of disability among social work students

References

• Devi N. Supported decision-making and personal autonomy for persons with intellectual disabilities: article 12 of the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. J Law Med Ethics. 2013;41:792–806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn G. Rethinking personhood: new directions in legal capacity law and policy or how to put the ‘shift’ back into paradigm shift. Galway: National University of Ireland, Center for Disability Law & Policy; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Glen KB. Changing paradigms: mental capacity, legal capacity, guardianship, and beyond. Colum Hum Rts Law Rev. 2012;44:93–169.
   Google Scholar
• Rimmerman A. Disability and community living policies. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn E, Arstein-Kerslake A. Legislating personhood: realising the right to support in exercising legal capacity. Int J Law Context. 2014;10:81–104.
   Google Scholar
• Salzman L. Rethinking guardianship (again): substituted decision making as a violation of the integration mandate of title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Univ Colo Law Rev. 2009;81:157–245.
   Google Scholar
• Melamed Y, Doron I, Shnitt D. Guardianship of people with mental disorders. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65:1118–1123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach M, Kerzner L. A new paradigm for protecting autonomy and the right to legal capacity. Canada: Law Commission of Ontario; 2010. Available from: www.ontla.on.ca/library/repository/mon/24011/306184.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Browning M, Bigby C, Douglas J. Supported decision making: understanding how its conceptual link to legal capacity is influencing the development of practice. Res Pract Intellect Dev Disabil. 2014;1:34–45.
   Google Scholar
• UN General Assembly. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Optional Protocol, U.N Doc. A/RES/61/106 (Dec. 13, 2006). Available from: http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Blanck P, Martinis JG. “The right to make choices”: the national resource center for supported decision-making. Inclusion. 2015;3:24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn NA, Blumenthal JA, Campbell AT. Supported decision-making: a viable alternative to guardianship? Penn State Law Rev. 2013;117:1111–1157.
   Google Scholar
• Legal Capacity and Guardianship Law. (1962).
   Google Scholar
• Schindler M, Segal-Reich M. Supported decision-making for older persons in Israel: the 2015 precedent and the following 2016 regulation. Elder Law Rev. 2016;10:1–21. ‏
   Google Scholar
• Soffer M, Koreh M, Rimmerman A. Politics of geographic exclusion: deinstitutionalization, hegemony and persons with intellectual disability in Israel. Disabil Soc. 2017;32:1180–1198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter AS, Tolub Y. The fight for personhood, legal capacity, and equal recognition under law for people with disabilities in Israel and beyond. Cardozo Law Rev. 2017;39:557.
   Google Scholar
• Knox L, Douglas JM, Bigby C. Whose decision is it anyway? How clinicians support decision-making participation after acquired brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:1926–1932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barel M. Doron I, Strier, R. Guardianship: a critical review. Soc Security 2015;96:55–85.
   Google Scholar
• Shanske S, Arnold J, Carvalho M, et al. Social workers as transition brokers: facilitating the transition from pediatric to adult medical care. Soc Work Health Care. 2012;51:279–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crampton A. The importance of adult guardianship for social work practice. J Gerontol Soc Work. 2004;43:117–129.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky M. Street level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York (NY): Russel Sage Foundation; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson L. Giving courts the information necessary to implement limited guardianships: are we there yet?. J Gerontol Soc Work. 2011;54:803–818.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doron I. Aging in the shadow of the law: the case of elder guardianship in Israel. J Aging Soc Policy. 2004;16:59–77.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schindler M. Protecting the well-being of the elder and the appointment of a guardian. Soc Welf. 2007;27:315–338.
   Google Scholar
• Araten-Bergman T, Werner S. Social workers’ attributions towards individuals with dual diagnosis of intellectual disability and mental illness. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2017;61:155–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Converse PE. The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In: Apter DE, editor. Ideology and discontent. London: Collier-Macmil; 1964. p. 206–261.
   Google Scholar
• Peffley MA, Hurwitz J. A hierarchical model of attitude constraint. Am J Political Sci. 1985;29:871–890. ‏
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta J. The varied roles of ideas in politics: from ‘whether’ to ‘how’. In: Béland D, Cox RH, editors. Ideas and politics in social research. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 23–46.
   Google Scholar
• Dominelli L. Anti-oppressive social work theory and practice. New York (NY): Palgrave Macmillan; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Dickens J. Care, control and change in child care proceedings: dilemmas for social workers, managers and lawyers. Child Fam Soc Work. 2006;11:23–32.
   Google Scholar
• Dickens J. The definition of social work in the United Kingdom, 2000–2010. Int J Soc Welf. 2012;21:34–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy LM. International social work: professional action in an interdependent world. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Limb GE, Organista KC. Comparisons between Caucasian students, students of color, and American Indian students on their views on social work’s traditional mission, career motivations, and practice preferences. J Soc Work Educ. 2003;39:91–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limb GE, Organista KC. Change between entry and graduation in MSW student views on social work’s traditional mission, career motivations, and practice preferences: Caucasian, student of color, and American Indian group comparisons. J Soc Work Educ. 2006;42:269–290. ‏
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makaros A, Weiss-Gal I. Comparison of the social and professional ideology of caseworkers and community social workers in Israel. Br J Soc Work. 2014;44:100–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizrahi T, Dodd SJ. MSW students’ perspectives on social work goals and social activism before and after completing graduate education. J Soc Work Educ. 2013;49:580–600.‏
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal-Engelchin D, Kaufman R. Micro-or macro-orientation? Israeli students’ career interests in an antisocial era. J Soc Work Educ. 2008;44:139–157. ‏
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes C, Mercer G. Exploring disability. Cambridge (UK): Polity Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley D. Disability studies: an interdisciplinary introduction. London: Sage; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare T. Debating disability. J Med Ethics. 2008;34:11–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardol M, De Jong BA, Ward CD. On autonomy and participation in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24:970–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson BE, Carnevale FA, King G. “This is my way”: reimagining disability, in/dependence and interconnectedness of persons and assistive technologies. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:1894–1899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilson SF, DePoy E. Theoretical approaches to disability content in social work education. J Soc Work Educ. 2002;38:153–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meekosha H, Dowse L. Integrating critical disability studies into social work education and practice: an Australian perspective. Practice 2007;19:169–183.
   Google Scholar
• Holler R, Werner S. Perceptions towards disability among social work students in Israel: Development and validation of a new scale. Health Soc Care Commun. 2018;26:423–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss-Gal I. The person-in-environment approach: professional ideology and practice of social workers in Israel. Soc Work. 2008;53:65–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. New York (NY): Guilford Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods. 2008;40:879–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner S, Araten-Bergman T. Social workers’ stigmatic perceptions of individuals with disabilities: A focus on three disabilities. J Ment Health Res Intellec Disabil. 2017;10:93–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reamer FG. Social work values and ethics. New York: Columbia University Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Gooding P. Supported decision-making: a rights-based disability concept and its implications for mental health law. Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2013;20:431–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby B, Douglas J, Carney T, et al. Delivering decision making support to people with cognitive disability. Aust J Soc Issues. 2017;52:222–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner S, Chabany R. Guardianship law versus supported decision-making policies: perceptions of persons with intellectual or psychiatric disabilities and parents. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2016;86:486–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelan A. Socially constructing older people: examining discourses which can shape nurses’ understanding and practice. J Adv Nurs. 2011;67:893–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiranandani V. Towards a critical theory of disability in social work. Crit Soc Work. 2005;6:1–6. ‏
   Google Scholar
• Morgan H. The social model of disability as a threshold concept: troublesome knowledge and liminal spaces in social work education. Soc Work Educ. 2012;31:215–226. ‏
   Google Scholar
• Roulstone A. ‘Stuck in the middle with you’: towards enabling social work with disabled people. Soc Work Educ. 2012;31:142–154.
   Google Scholar