1,154
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

The association between effectiveness of clinical supervision of allied health professionals and improvement in patient function in an inpatient rehabilitation setting

, , , , &
Pages 1173-1182 | Received 17 May 2018, Accepted 28 Aug 2018, Published online: 22 Jan 2019

References

  • Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. National safety and quality health standards [Internet]. Sydney: Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care; 2011 [cited 2017 Apr 16]. Available from: http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/NSQHS-Standards-Sept2011.pdf
  • Kilminster S, Cottrell D, Grant J. AMEE Guide No. 27: effective educational and clinical supervision. Med Teach. 2007;29:2–19.
  • Lyth GM. Clinical supervision: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2000;31:722–729.
  • Milne D. An empirical definition of clinical supervision. Br J Clin Psychol. 2007;46:437–477.
  • Pearce P, Phillips B, Dawson M, et al. Content of clinical supervision sessions for nurses and allied health professionals. Clin Governance. 2013;18:139–154.
  • Dawson M, Phillips P, Leggat S. Clinical supervision for allied health professionals: a systematic review. J Allied Health. 2013;42:65–73.
  • Proctor B. Enabling and ensuring: supervision in practice. In: Marken M, Payne M, editors. Supervision: a cooperative exercise in accountability. Leicester (UK): National Youth Bureau; 1986. p. 21–34.
  • Sloan G, Watson H. Clinical supervision models for nursing: structure, research and limitations. Nurs Stand. 2002;17:41–46.
  • Proctor B. Training for the supervision alliance. In: Cutcliffe JR, Hyrkäs K, Fowler J, editors. Routledge Handbook of Clinical Supervision Fundamental International Themes. London (UK): Routledge; 2010. p. 23–34.
  • Todd G, Freshwater D. Reflective practice and guided discovery: clinical supervision. Br J Nurs. 1999;8:1383–1389.
  • Mann K, Gordon J, Macleod A. Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009;14:595–621.
  • Winstanley J, White E. The MCSS-26 user manual. Sydney (Australia): Osman Consulting; 2011.
  • Brunero S, Stein-Parbury J. The effectiveness of clinical supervision in nursing: an evidence based literature review. Aust J Adv Nurs. 2008;25:86–94.
  • Dawson M, Phillips B, Leggat S. Effective clinical supervision for regional allied health professionals – the supervisee’s perspective. Aust Health Rev. 2012;36:92–97.
  • Gardner MJ, McKinstry C, Perrin B. Effectiveness of allied health clinical supervision a cross-sectional survey of supervisees. J Allied Health. 2018;47:126–132.
  • Snowdon DA, Millard G, Taylor NF. Effectiveness of clinical supervision of allied health professionals: a survey. J Allied Health. 2016;45:113–121.
  • Saxby C, Wilson J, Newcombe P. Does best practice clinical supervision lead to better outcomes? Findings from a Queensland study of community allied health professionals. In: NSW Institute of Psychiatry, editors. Advances in clinical supervision innovation and practice conference monograph. Proceedings of the advances in clinical supervision conference; 2013 Jun 4–6; Sydney, Australia. Parramatta (NSW): The New South Wales Institute of Psychiatry; 2013. p. 23–27.
  • Gonge H, Buus N. Model for investigating the benefits of clinical supervision in psychiatric nursing: a survey study. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2011;20:102–111.
  • White E, Winstanley J. Clinical supervision for nurses working in mental health settings in Queensland, Australia: selected findings from a novel Australian attempt to establish the evidence base for causal relationships with quality of care and patient outcomes, as an informed contribution to mental health nursing practice development. J Res Nurs. 2010;15:151–167.
  • Martin P, Kumar S, Lizarondo L. When I say … clinical supervision. Med Educ. 2017;51:890–891.
  • Kilminster SM, Jolly BC. Effective supervision in clinical practice settings: a literature review. Med Educ. 2000;34:827–840.
  • Darragh AR, Shiyko M, Margulis H, et al. Effects of a safe patient handling and mobility program on patient self-care outcomes. Am J Occup Ther. 2014;68:589–596.
  • Silva MA. Relationship between psychiatric diagnosis and functional outcome in physical therapy [dissertation]. Milwaukee (WI): Marquette University; 2011.
  • Choo SX, Stratford P, Richardson J, et al. Comparison of the sensitivity to change of the functional independence measure with the assessment of motor and process skills within different rehabilitation populations. Disabil Rehabil. 2018 [cited Aug 1]; [9 p.]. DOI:10.1080/09638288.2017.1375033
  • Fioravanti AM, Bordignon CM, Pettit SM, et al. Comparing the responsiveness of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills and the Functional Independence Measure. Can J Occup Ther. 2012;79:167–174.
  • Glenny C, Stolee P. Comparing the Functional Independence Measure and the interRAI/MDS for use in the functional assessment of older adults: a review of the literature. BMC Geriatr. 2009;9:52.
  • Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y, Granger CV, et al. The reliability of the Functional Independence Measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:1226–1232.
  • Cohen ME, Marino RJ. The tools of disability outcomes research functional status measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:S21–S29.
  • Fiedler RC, Granger CV, Ottenbacher KJ. The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation: report of first admissions for 1994. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;75:125–132.
  • Winstanley J, White E. The MCSS-26: revision of the Manchester Clinical Supervision Scale using the RASCH measurement model. J Nurs Measure. 2011;19:160–178.
  • Black-Schaffer RM, Winston C. Age and functional outcome after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2004;11:23–32.
  • Lieberman D, Friger M, Lieberman D. Inpatient rehabilitation outcome after hip fracture surgery in elderly patients: a prospective cohort study of 946 patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:167–171.
  • Patrick L, Knoefel F, Gaskowski P, et al. Medical comorbidity and rehabilitation efficiency in geriatric inpatients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49:1471–1477.
  • Jette DU, Warren RL, Wirtalla C. The relation between therapy intensity and outcomes of rehabilitation in skilled nursing facilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:373–379.
  • Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–383.
  • De Groot V, Beckerman H, Lankhorst G, et al. How to measure comorbidity. a critical review of available methods. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:221–229.
  • Muthén LK, Muthén BO, Mplus User’s Guide. 7th ed. Los Angeles (CA): Muthén LK, Muthén BO; 2012.
  • Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS. Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications; 2002.
  • Scherbaum CA, Ferreter JM. Estimating statistical power and required sample sizes for organizational research using multilevel modeling. Organ Res Meth. 2009;12:347–367.
  • Maas CJM, Hox JP. Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology. 2005;1:86–92.
  • Peiris CL, Taylor NF, Shields N. Additional Saturday allied health services increase habitual physical activity among patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation for lower limb orthopedic conditions: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:1365–1370.
  • Peiris CL, Shields N, Brusco NK, et al. Additional Saturday rehabilitation improves functional independence and quality of life and reduces length of stay: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med. 2013;11:198.
  • Snowdon DA, Hau R, Leggat SG, et al. Does clinical supervision of health professionals improve patient safety? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Qual Health Care. 2016;28:447–455.
  • Snowdon DA, Leggat SG, Taylor NF. Does clinical supervision of healthcare professionals improve effectiveness of care and patient experience? A systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:786.
  • Busari JO, Weggelaar NM, Knottnerus AC, et al. How medical residents perceive the quality of supervision provided by attending doctors in the clinical setting. Med Educ. 2005;39:696–703.
  • Hauer KE, Oza SK, Kogan JR, et al. How clinical supervisors develop trust in their trainees: a qualitative study. Med Educ. 2015;49:783–795.
  • Redpath AA, Gill SD, Finlay N, et al. Public sector physiotherapists believe that staff supervision should be broad ranging, individualised, structured, and based on needs and goals: a qualitative study. J Physiother. 2015;61:210–216.
  • Peiris CL, Shields N, Brusco NK, et al. Additional physical therapy services reduce length of stay and improve health outcomes in people with acute and subacute conditions: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 [cited Aug 1]; [14 p.]. DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2018.03.005
  • Snowdon DA, Millard G, Taylor NF. Effectiveness of clinical supervision of physiotherapists: a survey. Aust Health Rev. 2015;39:190–196.
  • Kitson A, Marshall A, Bassett K, et al. What are the core elements of patient-centred care? A narrative review and synthesis of the literature from health policy, medicine and nursing. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69:4–15.
  • Black N. Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. BMJ. 2013;346:f167.
  • Turner-stokes L. Goal attainment scaling (GAS) in rehabilitation: a practical guide. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23:362–370.
  • Skubik-Peplaski C, Howell DM, Hunter EG, et al. Occupational therapists’ perceptions of environmental influences on practice at an inpatient stroke rehabilitation program: a pilot study. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2015;33:250–262.
  • Smith S, Roberts P, Balmer S. Role overlap and professional boundaries: future implications for physiotherapy and occupational therapy in the NHS: forum. Physiotherapy. 2000;86:397–400.
  • Gibbs G. Learning by doing: a guide to teaching and learning methods. Oxford (UK): Oxford Polytechnic; 1998.
  • Hordacre BG, Stevermuer T, Simmonds F, et al. Lower-limb amputee rehabilitation in Australia: analysis of a national data set 2004-10. Aust Health Rev. 2013;37:41–47.
  • New PW. Non-traumatic spinal cord injury: what is the ideal setting for rehabilitation? Aust Health Rev. 2006;30:353–361.
  • Nezlek JB. An introduction to multilevel modeling for social and personality psychology. Social Pers Psych Compass. 2008;2:842–860.
  • Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Descriptive studies: what they can and cannot do. Lancet. 2002;359:145–149.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.