Experiences of people with severe aphasia and spouses attending an Interdisciplinary Community Aphasia Group

References

• Brown K, Worrall LE, Davidson B, et al. Snapshots of success: an insider perspective on living successfully with aphasia. Aphasiology. 2010;24:1267–1295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown K, Worrall LE, Davidson B, et al. Living successfully with aphasia: family members share their views. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18:536–548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose ML, Attard MC. Practices and challenges in community aphasia groups in Australia: results of a national survey. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;17:241–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman RJ. Group treatment of neurogenic communication disorders: the expert clinician's approach. 2nd ed. (Elman RJ, editor.). San Diego (CA): Plural Publishing; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Lanyon LE, Rose ML, Worrall LE. The efficacy of outpatient and community-based aphasia group interventions: a systematic review. Int J Speech Lang Pathol [Internet]. 2013;15:359–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attard MC, Lanyon LE, Togher L, et al. Consumer perspectives on community aphasia groups: a narrative literature review in the context of psychological well-being. Aphasiology. 2015;29:983–1019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aphasia Community. Current groups. www.aphasiacommunity/current-groups [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 July 31]. Available from: http://aphasia.community/current-groups
   Google Scholar
• Deloitte Access Economics. The economic impact of stroke in Australia. Melbourne, Australia: National Stroke Foundation; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Grawburg M, Howe T, Worrall L, et al. Third-party disability in family members of people with aphasia: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:1324–1341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Threats TT. The ICF framework and third party disability: application to the spouses of persons with aphasia. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010;17:451–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow C. Barriers and facilitators that affect access to an outpatient speech-language therapy aphasia clinic. Unpublished master’s thesis. Christchurch, New Zealand: University of Canterbury. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Corsten S, Schimpf EJ, Konradi J, et al. The participants’ perspective: how biographic-narrative intervention influences identity negotiation and quality of life in aphasia. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2015;50:788–800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cubirka L, Barnes S, Ferguson A. Student speech pathologists’ experiences of an aphasia therapy group. Aphasiology. 2015;29:1497–1515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotherham A, Howe T, Tillard G. Perceived benefits for family members of group participation by their relatives with aphasia. Clin Arch Commun Disord. 2016;1:62–68.
   Google Scholar
• Rotherham A, Howe T, Tillard G. “We just thought that this was Christmas”: perceived benefits of participating in aphasia, stroke, and other groups. Aphasiology. 2015;29:965–982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. International classification of functioning, disability, and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Davis GA. A survey of adult aphasia. Englewood Cliffs (N.J): Prentice-Hall; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Grawburg M, Howe T, Worrall L, et al. A systematic review of the positive outcomes for family members of people with aphasia. Evidence-based communication assessment and intervention. 2012;6:135–149.
   Google Scholar
• LPAA Project Group. Life participation approach to aphasia: a statement of values for the future. The ASHA Leader 2000;5:4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Brown K, Worrall LE, Davidson B, et al. Living successfully with aphasia: a qualitative meta-analysis of the perspectives of individuals with aphasia, family members, and speech-language pathologists. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. [Internet]. 2012;14:141–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumby K, Whitworth A. Evaluating the effectiveness of intervention in long-term aphasia post-stroke: the experience from CHANT (Communication Hub for Aphasia in North Tyneside). Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2012;47:398–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamplin J, Baker FA, Jones B, et al. “Stroke a Chord”: the effect of singing in a community choir on mood and social engagement for people living with aphasia following a stroke. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;32:929–941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tregea S, Brown K. What makes a successful peer-led aphasia support group? Aphasiology. 2013;27:581–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Gaag A, Smith L, Davis S, et al. Therapy and support services for people with long-term stroke and aphasia and their relatives: a six-month follow-up study. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:372–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanyon LE, Worrall L, Rose M. “It’s not really worth my while”: understanding contextual factors contributing to decisions to participate in community aphasia groups. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;25:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanyon LE, Worrall L, Rose M. What really matters to people with aphasia when it comes to group work? A qualitative investigation of factors impacting participation and integration. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2018;53:526–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanyon LE, Worrall LE, Rose ML. Combating social isolation for people with severe chronic aphasia through community aphasia groups: consumer views on getting it right and wrong. Aphasiology. 2018;32:493–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beesley K, Alston MK, White JH, et al. Art after stroke: the qualitative experience of community dwelling stroke survivors in a group art programme. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:2346–2355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parr S. Living with severe aphasia: the experience of communication impairment after stroke. Brighton, UK: Pavillion Publishing; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Attard MC, Loupis Y, Togher L, & Rose ML. The efficacy of an inter-disciplinary community aphasia group for living well with aphasia. Aphasiology. 2018;32(2):105–138. http://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2017.1381877
   Google Scholar
• Kagan AA, Black SE, Duchan J, et al. Training volunteers as conversation partners using “Supported Conversation for Adults With Aphasia” (SCA): a controlled trial. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001;44:624–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan AA, Winckel J, Black SE, et al. A set of observational measures for rating support and participation in conversation between adults with aphasia and their conversation partners. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2004;11:67–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ritchie J, Spencer K. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Burgess B, Bryman A, editors. Analyzing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1994. pp 173–194.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln Y, Guba E. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Pound C, Parr S, Lindsay J, et al. Beyond aphasia: therapies for living with communication disability. Oxon, UK: Speechmark; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Hartke RJ, King RB, Denby F. The use of writing groups to facilitate adaptation after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007;14:26–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legg LA, Stott D, Ellis G, et al. Volunteer Stroke Service (VSS) groups for patients with communication difficulties after stroke: a qualitative analysis of the value of groups to their users. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21:794–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purves BA, Petersen J, Puurveen G. An aphasia mentoring program: perspectives of speech‐language pathology students and of mentors with aphasia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013;22:S370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pound C, Parr S, Duchan J. Using partners' autobiographical reports to develop, deliver, and evaluate services in aphasia. Aphasiology. 2001;15:477–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briley P, Nail K, Winslow S, et al. University affiliated aphasia groups: benefits to persons with aphasia, families, and student trainees. J Speech Pathol Ther 2017;2:early online.
   Google Scholar
• Fox LE, Poulsen S, Clark Bawden K, et al. Critical elements and outcomes of a residential family-based intervention for aphasia caregivers. Aphasiology. 2004;18:1177–1199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdy M, Hindenlang J. Educating and training caregivers of persons with aphasia. Aphasiology. 2005;19:377–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman RJ, Bernstein-Ellis E. Psychosocial aspects of group communication treatment: preliminary findings. Semin Speech Lang. 1999;20:65–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Avent JR, Glista SO, Wallace SJ, et al. Family information needs about aphasia. Aphasiology. 2005;19:365–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michallet B, Le Dorze G, Tétreault S. The needs of spouses caring for severely aphasic persons. Aphasiology. 2001;15:731–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parr S, Byng S, Gilpin S, et al. Talking about aphasia: living with loss of language after stroke. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Hallé M-C, Le Dorze G. Understanding significant others’ experience of aphasia and rehabilitation following stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;49:748–760.
   Google Scholar
• Worrall LE, Davidson B, Howe TJ, et al. Clients as teachers: two aphasia groups at The University of Queensland. In: Elman RJ, editor. Group treatment of neurogenic communication disorders: The expert clinician's approach. 2nd ed. San Diego: Plural Publishing Inc.; 2007. pp 127–144.
   Google Scholar
• Parr S, Byng S. Talking about aphasia: reflections on an innovative research project. Toronto, Canada: Aphasia Institute Webinar [Mutlimedia]. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Frank AW. Illness as moral occasion: restoring agency to ill people. Health (London). 1997;1:131–148.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrant M, Warmoth K, Code C, et al. Creating psychological connections between intervention recipients: development and focus group evaluation of a group singing session for people with aphasia. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e009652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumby K, Whitworth A. Adjustment processes in chronic aphasia after stroke: exploring multiple perspectives in the context of a community-based intervention. Aphasiology. 2013;27:462–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan AA, Cohen-Schneider R, Sherman C, et al. Groups in the Aphasia Institute's Introductory Program: preparing to live successfully with aphasia. In: Elman RJ, editor. Group treatment of neurogenic communication disorders: the expert clinician's approach. 2nd ed. San Diego: Plural Publishing Inc.; 2007. pp 211–232.
   Google Scholar
• Michallet B, Tétreault S, Le Dorze G. The consequences of severe aphasia on the spouses of aphasic people: a description of the adaptation process. Aphasiology. 2003;17:835–859. January
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe TJ, Davidson B, Worrall LE, et al. “You needed to rehab … families as well”: family members’ own goals for aphasia rehabilitation. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2012;47:511–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie A, Murphy J, Place M. Divergences of perspective between people with aphasia and their family caregivers. Aphasiology. 2010;24:1559–1575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toseland RW, Rossiter CM, Labrecque MS. The effectiveness of peer-led and professionally led groups to support family caregivers. Gerontologist. 1989;29:465–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarit SH, Anthony CR, Boutselis M. Intervention with care givers of dementia patients: comparison of two approaches. Psychol Ageing. 1987;2:225–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd V, Gatherer A, Kalsy S. Conducting qualitative interview research with people with expressive language difficulties. Qual Health Res. 2006;16:1386–1404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinburn K, Byng S. The Communication Disability Profile. London: Connect Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar