What really matters in pediatric chronic pain rehabilitation? Results of a multi-stakeholder nominal group technique study

References

• Forgeron P, King S, Stinson J, et al. Social functioning and peer relationships in children and adolescents with chronic pain: a systematic review. Pain Res Manag. 2010;15:27–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huguet A, Miró J. The severity of chronic pediatric pain: an epidemiological study. J Pain. 2008;9:226–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowski Holley A, Law E, Zhou C, et al. Reciprocal longitudinal associations between pain and depressive symptoms in adolescents. Eur J Pain. 2013;17:1058–1067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noel M, Groenewald N, Beals-Erikson S, et al. Chronic pain in adolescents and internalizing mental health disorders, in adulthood: a national representative study. Pain 2016;157:1333–1338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hechler T, Kanstrup M, Holley AL, et al. Systematic review on intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment of children with chronic pain. Pediatrics 2015;136:115–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability, and health: Children & youth version: ICF-CY. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Löwing K, Hamer EG, Bexelius A, et al. Exploring the relationship of family goals and scores on standardized measures in children with cerebral palsy, using the ICF-CY. Developmental Neurorehab. 2011;14:79–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross A, Rosenbaum P, Grahovac D, et al. Knowledge mobilization to spread awareness of ‘F-words’ in childhood disability: lessons from a family–researcher partnership. Child. 2015;41:947–953.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum P, Stewart D. The World Health Organization International Classification of Function, Disability, and Health: a model to guide clinical thinking, practice and research in cerebral palsy. Seminars Pediatric Neurol. 2004;11:5–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boutier J, King S. Missed opportunities: school as an undervalued site for effective pain management. Pediat Pain Lett. 2013;15:9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Lamontagne M, Swaine B, Lavoie A, et al. Consensus group sessions: a useful method to reconcile stakeholders’ perceptive about network performance evaluation. Int J Integrated Care. 2010;10:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klassen A, Miller A, Anderson N, et al. Performance measurement and improvement frameworks in health, education and social services systems: a systematic review. Int J Quality Health Care. 2010;22:44–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve J, Peerbhoy D. Evaluating the evaluation: understanding the utility and limitation of evaluation as a tool for organizational learning. Health Education J. 2007;66:120–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen HT. Practical program evaluation: theory-driven evaluation and the integrated evaluation perspective, 2nd edition. London: SAGE Publications. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath P, Walk G, Turk D, et al. Core outcome domains and measures for pediatric acute and chronic/recurrent pain clinical trials: PedIMMPACT recommendations. J Pain. 2008;9:771–783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacristán JA. Patient-centered medicine and patient-oriented research: improving health outcomes for individual patients. BMC Medical Informatics Decision Making. 2013;13:6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan DE, Simons LE, Stein MJ, et al. School impairment in adolescents with chronic pain. J Pain. 2008;9:407–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccleston C, Wastell S, Crombez G, et al. Adolescent social development and chronic pain. Eur J Pain. 2008;12:765–774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan DE, Coakley RM, Scharff L. Teachers’ perceptions of and responses to adolescents with chronic pain syndromes. J Pediatric Psychol. 2006;32:139–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camden C, Shikako-Thomas K, Nguyen T, et al. Engaging stakeholders in rehabilitation research: a scoping review of strategies used in partnerships and evaluation of impacts. Disability Rehab. 2015;37:1390–1400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birken SA, Lee SYD, Weiner BJ. Uncovering middle managers' role in healthcare innovation implementation. Implement Sci. 2012;7:28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagliardi AR, Dobrow MJ. Identifying the conditions needed for integrated knowledge translation (IKT) in health care organizations: qualitative interviews with researchers and research users. BMC Health Services Res. 2016;16:256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle RL, Lopez ER, Gormley KE, et al. What roles do middle managers play in implementation of innovative practices?. Health Care Manage Rev. 2017;42:14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris C, Shilling V, McHugh C, et al. Why it is crucial to involve families in all stages of childhood disability research. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53:769–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum P. Family-centred research: what does it mean and can we do it? Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53:99–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, et al. Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health. 1984;74:979–983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacPhail A. Nominal group technique: a useful method for working with young people. Brit Educ Res J. 2001;27:161–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, et al. ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37:212–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd ed. London, UK: SAGE Publication Inc; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Boulkedid R, Abdoul H, Loustau M, et al. Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2011;6:e20476. doi:10.1371/journal,pone.0020476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan S, King M, Tully M. How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques. Int J Clin Pharm. 2016;38:655–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter M, Gordon S, Hamer P. The nominal group technique: a useful consensus methodology in physiotherapy research. N Z J Physiotherapy. 2004;32:126–130.
   Google Scholar
• Peng P, Stinson JN, Choiniere M, et al. Dedicated multidisciplinary pain management centres for children in Canada: the current status. Can J Anesth. 2007;54:985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahlschmidt L, Zernikow B, Wager J. Specialized rehabilitation programs for children and adolescents with severe disabling chronic pain: indications, treatment and outcomes. Children. 2016;3:33.
   Google Scholar
• Heiligenhaus A, Foeldvari I, Edelsten C, et al. Proposed outcome measures for prospective clinical trials in juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis: a consensus effort from the multinational interdisciplinary working group for uveitis in childhood. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64:1365–1372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wainwright D, Boichat C, McCracken LM. Using the nominal group technique to engage people with chronic pain in health service development. Int J Health Plann Mgmt. 2014;29:52–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace SJ, Worrall L, Rose T, et al. Which outcomes are most important to people with aphasia and their families? An international nominal group technique study framed within the ICF. Disability Rehab. 2017;39:1364–1379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargus-Adams J, Martin L. Measuring what matters in cerebral palsy: A breath of important domains and outcome measures. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2009;90:2089–2095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum P, Gorter JW. The ‘F‐words’ in childhood disability: I swear this is how we should think!. Child: Care Health Dev. 2012;38:457–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of function, disability, and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Applied Survey Methods – Statistical Perspective, Survey Methods, Weighted Adjustments. Retrieved May 2017 from http://www.applied-survey-methods.com/weight.html.
   Google Scholar
• de Wit MPT, Abma TA, Koelewijn-van Loon MS, et al. What has been the effect on trial outcome assessments of a decade of patient participation in OMERACT? J Rheumatol. 2014;41:177–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson PR, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, et al. Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials. 2012;13:132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold L, Crofford L, Mease P, et al. Patient perspectives on the impact of fibromyalgia. Patient Educ Counsel. 2008;73:114–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr A, Hewlett S, Hughes R, et al. Rheumatology outcomes: the patient's perspective. J Rheumatol. 2003;30:880–883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mease P, Arnold L, Crofford L, et al. Identifying the clinical domains of fibromyalgia: contributions from clinician and patient Delphi exercise. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:952–960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson T, Morris M, Calnan M, et al. What outcomes from pharmacologic treatment are important to people with rheumatoid arthritis? Creating the basis of a patient core set. Arthritis Care Res. 2010;62:640–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appleton JJ, Christenson SL, Furlong MJ. Student engagement with school: critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychol Schs. 2008;45:369–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agoston A, Gray L, Logan D. Pain in school: patterns of pain related impairment among adolescents with primary pain conditions, juvenile arthritis, and pain-free peers. Children. 2016;31:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Shernoff D, Schmidt J. Further evidence of an engagement-achievement paradox among U.S. high school students. J Youth Adolescence. 2008;37:564–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cousins L, Kalapurakkel S, Cohen L, et al. Topical review: resilience resources and mechanisms in pediatric chronic pain. J Pediatr Psychol. 2015;40:840–845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zernikow B, Ruhe AM, Stahlschmidt L, et al. Clinical and economic long-term treatment outcomes in children and adolescents with disabling chronic pain. Pain Med. 2017;0:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Carpino E, Segal S, Logan D, et al. The interplay of pain-related self-efficacy and fear on functional outcomes among youth with headache. J Pain. 2014;15:527–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalapurakkel S, Carpino E, Lebel A, et al. Pain Can’t Stop Me”: examining pain self-efficacy and acceptance as resilience processes among youth with chronic headache. J Pediatr Psychol. 2015;40:926–933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCraken L. Committed action: an application of the psychological flexibility model to activity patterns in chronic pain. J Pain. 2013;14:828–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCracken LM, Morley S. The psychological flexibility model: a basis for integration and progress in psychological approaches to chronic pain management. J Pain. 2014;15:221–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair C, Meredith P, Strong J, Feeney B. Personal and contextual factors affecting the functional ability of children and adolescents with chronic pain: a systematic review. J Dev Behav Pediat. 2016;37:327–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palermo TM, Valrie CR, Karlson CW. Family and parent influences on pediatric chronic pain: a developmental perspective. Am Psychol. 2014;69:142–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempert H, Benore E, Heines R. Physical and occupational therapy outcomes: adolescents’ change in functional abilities using objective measures and self-report. Scand J Pain. 2017;14:60–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coster W, Deeney TA, Haltiwanger JT, et al. School function assessment user's manual. San Antonio: Therapy Skill Builders; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Coster W, Bedell G, Law M, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the participation and environment measure for children and youth. Dev Med Child Neurolol. 2011;53:1030–1037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domecq J, Prustsky G, Eltaiyah T, et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carman K, Dardes P, Maurer M, et al. Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Affairs. 2013;32:223–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar