Motivators and barriers to using information and communication technology in everyday life following stroke: a qualitative and video observation study

References

• McKay J, Mensah GA. The atlas of heart disease and stroke. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004. p. 112.
   Google Scholar
• Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, Krishnamurthi R, et al. Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2014;383:245–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intercollegiate Working Party for Stroke. National clinical guideline for stroke. 4th ed. London: Royal College of Physicians of London; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke PJ, Lawrence JM, Black SE. Changes in quality of life over the first year after stroke: findings from the Sunnybrook stroke study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000;9:121–127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reynolds PS, Crenshaw CT, Lefkowitz DS, et al. A practical stroke severity scale predicts hospital outcomes. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2001;10:231–235.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rochette A, Desrosiers J, Bravo G, et al. Changes in participation after a mild stroke: quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007;14:59–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tellier M, Rochette A. Falling through the cracks: a literature review to understand the reality of mild stroke survivors. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009;16:454–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamit T, Maeir A, Ben Assayag E, et al. Impact of first-ever mild stroke on participation at 3 and 6 month post-event: the TABASCO study. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:667–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards DF, Hahn M, Baum C, et al. The impact of mild stroke on meaningful activity and life satisfaction. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006;15:151–157.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zuppo CM. Defining ICT in a boundaryless world: the development of a working hierarchy. Int J Inf Technol. 2012;4:13–22.
   Google Scholar
• ITU. ICT facts and figures 2017 [Internet]. Geneva: ICT Data and Statistics Division Telecommunication Development Bureau; 2017 [cited 2018 Oct 7]. Available at https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/ICTFactsFigures2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Statista. Smartphone user penetration as percentage of total global population from 2014 to 2021 [Internet]. Statistics portal. 2018. Available at https://www.statista.com/statistics/203734/global-smartphone-penetration-per-capita-since-2005/
   Google Scholar
• Research New Zealand. A report on a survey of New Zealanders’ use of smartphones and other mobile communication devices 2015 [Internet]. Wellington: Research New Zealand; 2015 [cited 2018 Feb 1] p. 16. Report No.: 3. Available at http://www.researchnz.com/pdf/special%20reports/research%20new%20zealand%20special%20report%20-%20use%20of%20smartphones.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kurniawan S. Mobile phone design for older persons. Interactions. 2007;1;14:24.
   Google Scholar
• Plaza I, Martín L, Martin S, et al. Mobile applications in an aging society: status and trends. J Syst Softw. 2011;84:1977–1988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berenguer A, Goncalves J, Hosio S, et al. Are smartphones ubiquitous?: an in-depth survey of smartphone adoption by seniors. IEEE Consumer Electron Mag. 2017;6:104–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu L. Technology, media and telecommunications predictions 2018 [Internet]. China: Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited; 2017 p. 78. Available at https://www2.deloitte.com/cn/en/pages/technology-media-and-telecommunications/articles/tmt-predictions-2018.html
   Google Scholar
• Rosen MJ. Telerehabilitation. NeuroRehabilitation. 1999;12:11–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver KE, Schoene D, Crotty M, et al. Telerehabilitation services for stroke. In: The Cochrane Collaboration, editor. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [Internet]. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2013 [cited 2015 Jun 28]. Available at http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD010255.pub2
   Google Scholar
• Coupar F, Pollock A, Legg LA, et al. Home-based therapy programmes for upper limb functional recovery following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;5:CD006755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund ML, Lövgren-engström A, Lexell J. Using everyday technology to compensate for difficulties in task performance in daily life: experiences in persons with acquired brain injury and their significant others. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6:402–411.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fager SK, Burnfield JM. Patients' experiences with technology during inpatient rehabilitation: opportunities to support independence and therapeutic engagement. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;9:121–127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boman I-L, Bartfai A, Borell L, et al. Support in everyday activities with a home-based electronic memory aid for persons with memory impairments. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5:339–350.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kamwesiga JT, Tham K, Guidetti S. Experiences of using mobile phones in everyday life among persons with stroke and their families in Uganda – a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39:438–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustavsson M, Ytterberg C, Marwaa MN, et al. Experiences of using information and communication technology within the first year after stroke – a grounded theory study. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40:561–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engström A-LL, Lexell J, Lund ML. Difficulties in using everyday technology after acquired brain injury: a qualitative analysis. Scand J Occup Ther. 2010;17:233–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassberg A-C, Prellwitz M, Lund ML. The challenges of everyday technology in the workplace for persons with acquired brain injury. Scand J Occup Ther. 2013;20:272–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. What can “thematic analysis” offer health and wellbeing researchers?. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-Being. 2014;9:26152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurniawan S. Older people and mobile phones: a multi-method investigation. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2008;66:889–901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H, Heo J, Shim J, et al. Contextual research on elderly users’ needs for developing universal design mobile phone. In: Stephanidis C, editor. Universal access in human computer interaction coping with diversity [Internet]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2007 [cited 2018 Jan 3]. p. 950–959. Available at http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-540-73279-2_106
   Google Scholar
• Vaes K. Product stigmaticity understanding, measuring and managing product-related stigma: proefschrift. Delft: Delft University of Technology; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Lindén A, Lexell J, Lund ML. Improvements of task performance in daily life after acquired brain injury using commonly available everyday technology. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6:214–224.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• White J, Janssen H, Jordan L, et al. Tablet technology during stroke recovery: a survivor’s perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:1186–1192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindqvist E, Borell L. Computer-based assistive technology and changes in daily living after stroke. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;7:364–371.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Northcott S, Moss B, Harrison K, et al. A systematic review of the impact of stroke on social support and social networks: associated factors and patterns of change. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30:811–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for CVD: implications for evidence-based patient care and scientific inquiry. Heart. 2016;102:987–989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y-RR, Schulz PJ. The effect of information communication technology interventions on reducing social isolation in the elderly: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18:e18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu T-W, Ng SS, Kwong PW, et al. Fear avoidance behavior, not walking endurance, predicts the community reintegration of community-dwelling stroke survivors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:1684–1690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn N, Gorard S, Furlong J, et al. Older adults’ use of information and communications technology in everyday life. Age Soc. 2003;23:561–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatla SK, Shirzad N, Lohse KR, et al. Therapists' perceptions of social media and video game technologies in upper limb rehabilitation. JMIR Serious Games. 2015;3:e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul L, Wyke S, Brewster S, et al. Increasing physical activity in stroke survivors using STARFISH, an interactive mobile phone application: a pilot study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016;23:170–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micallef N, Baillie L, Uzor S. Time to exercise!: an aide-memoire stroke app for post-stroke arm rehabilitation. In ACM Press; 2016 [cited 2018; Mar 26]. p 112–123. Available at http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2935334.2935338
   Google Scholar
• Hill AJ, Miller LE. A survey of the clinical use of telehealth in speech-language pathology across Australia. J Speech Pathol Ther. 2012;14:110–117.
   Google Scholar