941
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Communicating information and professional knowledge in acquired brain injury rehabilitation trajectories – a qualitative study of physiotherapy practice

, &
Pages 2012-2019 | Received 06 Mar 2018, Accepted 31 Oct 2018, Published online: 21 Dec 2018

References

  • Turner-Stokes L, Wade D. Rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: concise guidance. Clin Med. 2004;4:61–65.
  • Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services. St.mld nr. 47 (2008-2009) Samhandlingsreformen. Rett behandling - på rett sted - til rett tid [Report No. 47 (2008-2009) to the Storting. The Coordination Reform. Proper treatment - at the right place and right time] Oslo: regjeringen.no; 2009. Available from: https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/d4f0e16ad32e4bbd8d8ab5c21445a5dc/en-gb/pdfs/stm200820090047000en_pdfs.pdf.
  • Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services. Nevroplan 2015, Del-plan til Omsorgsplan 2015 [Neuroplan 2015, Sub-plan to Careplan 2015] Oslo: regjeringen.no; 2011. Available from: https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/cca646be99be45af96eaec07a7739234/nevroplan2015.pdf?id=2291615.
  • Bidgood E. Healthcare systems: Sweden & localism – an example for the UK? London: Civitas; 2013. Available from: http://www.civitas.org.uk/reports_articles/briefing-healthcare-systems-sweden-localism-an-example-for-the-uk/.
  • Vrangbaek K, Sørensen LM. Does municipal co-financing reduce hospitalisation rates in Denmark?. Scand J Public Health 2013;41:616–622.
  • Steel D, Cylus J. United Kingdom (Scotland): health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2012;14:1–150.
  • Bauld L, Judge K, Barnes M, et al. Promoting social change: the experience of health action zones in England. J Soc Policy 2005;34:427–445.
  • Grimsmo A, Magnussen J. Norsk samhandlingsreform i et internasjonalt perspektiv [The Norwegian coordination reform in an international perspective]. The Norwegian University of Science and Technology; 2015. Available from: https://www.forskningsradet.no/prognett-evasam/Forside/1253972204829.
  • Royal College of Nursing. Moving care to the community: an international perspective: RCN policy and international department policy briefing 12/13 March 2013; 2013. Available from: https://www.rcn.org.uk/about-us/policy-briefings/pol-1213.
  • Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services. St.mld nr. 26 (2014-2015) Fremtidens primaerhelsetjeneste - naerhet og helhet [Report No. 26 (2014-2015) to the Storting. The primary health and care services of tomorrow - localised and integrated] Oslo: regjeringen.no; 2015. Available from: https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld.-st.-26-2014-2015/id2409890/.
  • Office of the Auditor General of Norway. Riksrevisjonens undersøkelse av ressursutnyttelse og kvalitet i helsetjenesten etter innføringen av samhandlingsreformen [The Office of the Auditor General`s investigation of resource utilisation and quality in the health service following the introduction of the Coordination Reform] Oslo: riksrevisjonen.no; 2016. Available from: https://www.riksrevisjonen.no/en/Reports/Pages/CoordinationReform.aspx.
  • Spesialisthelsetjenesteloven [Specialist Health Care Services Act]. 2001.
  • Dahlgren MA, Richardson B, Sjöström B. Professions as communities of practice. In: Higgs J, Richardson B, Dahlgren MA, editors. Developing practice knowledge for health professionals. London: Butterworth Heinemann; 2004.
  • Bodenheimer T. Coordinating care—a perilous journey through the health care system. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1064–1071.
  • Coleman EA, Boult C. Improving the quality of transitional care for persons with complex care needs. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:556–557.
  • Laver K, Lannin NA, Bragge P, et al. Organising health care services for people with an acquired brain injury: an overview of systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:397.
  • Cameron JI, O’Connell C, Foley N, et al. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: managing transitions of care following stroke, guidelines update 2016. Int J Stroke 2016;11:807–822.
  • Turner BJ, Fleming JM, Ownsworth TL, et al. The transition from hospital to home for individuals with acquired brain injury: a literature review and research recommendations. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:1153–1176.
  • Nalder E, Fleming J, Cornwell P, et al. Reflections on life: experiences of individuals with brain injury during the transition from hospital to home. Brain Inj. 2013;27:1294–1303.
  • Piccenna L, Lannin NA, Gruen R, et al. The experience of discharge for patients with an acquired brain injury from the inpatient to the community setting: a qualitative review. Brain Injury. 2016;30:241–251.
  • Abrahamson V, Jensen J, Springett K, et al. Experiences of patients with traumatic brain injury and their careers during transition from in-patient rehabilitation to the community: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39:1683–1694.
  • Mulvale G, Embrett M, Razavi SD. ‘Gearing Up’ to improve interprofessional collaboration in primary care: a systematic review and conceptual framework. BMC Family Pract. 2016;17:83.
  • Allen J, Hutchinson AM, Brown R, et al. Quality care outcomes following transitional care interventions for older people from hospital to home: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:346.
  • Inglis SC, Pearson S, Treen S, et al. Extending the horizon in chronic heart failure: effects of multidisciplinary, home-based intervention relative to usual care. Circulation 2006;114:2466–2473.
  • Askim T, Rohweder G, Lydersen S, et al. Evaluation of an extended stroke unit service with early supported discharge for patients living in a rural community. A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:238–248.
  • Stig K, Lütz IP. Financing of health care in the Nordic countries. Nordic Medico Statistical Committee. 2013.
  • World Medical Association. WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects; 2013. Available from: http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/.
  • Ohman A. Qualitative methodology for rehabilitation research. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37:273–280.
  • Brinkmann S, Kvale S. InterViews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage; 2015. XVIII, 405s.p.
  • Malterud K. Systematic text condensation: a strategy for qualitative analysis. Scand J Public Health 2012;40:795–805.
  • Alvesson M, Sköldberg K. Reflexive methodology: new vistas for qualitative research. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2009.
  • Blaikie N. Designing social research: the logic of anticipation. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2010.
  • Tjora AH. Kvalitative forskningsmetoder i praksis. 3nd ed. Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk; 2017.
  • Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001;358:483–488.
  • Coit MH, Katz JT, McMahon GT. The effect of workload reduction on the quality of residents’ discharge summaries. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26:28–32.
  • Kim W, Charchian B, Chang EY, et al. Strengthening information capture in rehabilitation discharge summaries: an application of the Siebens domain management model. PM&R. 2013;5:182–188.
  • Callen JL, Alderton M, McIntosh J. Evaluation of electronic discharge summaries: a comparison of documentation in electronic and handwritten discharge summaries. Int J Med Inform. 2008;77:613–620.
  • Thornquist E. Fysioterapeuters journaler –En sykehusundersøkelse [Physiotherapy journals – A hospital survey]. Fysioterapeuten 2007;3:19–24.
  • Wimsett J, Harper A, Jones P. Review article: components of a good quality discharge summary: a systematic review. Emerg Med Australas. 2014;26:430–438.
  • Kripalani S, LeFevre F, Phillips CO, et al. Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care. JAMA. 2007;297:831–841.
  • Horwitz LI, Jenq GY, Brewster UC, et al. Comprehensive quality of discharge summaries at an academic medical center. J Hosp Med. 2013;8:436–443.
  • Dobrzykowski DD, Tarafdar M. Understanding information exchange in healthcare operations: Evidence from hospitals and patients. J Operat Manage. 2015;36:201–214.
  • Slomic M, Soberg HL, Sveen U, et al. Transitions of patients with traumatic brain injury and multiple trauma between specialized and municipal rehabilitation services—professionals’ perspectives. Cogent Med. 2017;4. DOI: 10.1080/2331205X.2017.1
  • Høyem A, Gammon D, Berntsen G, et al. Keeping one step ahead: a qualitative study among Norwegian health-care providers in hospitals involved in care coordination for patients with complex needs. Int J Care Coordinat. 2018;21:15–25.
  • Solvang PK, Fougner M. Professional roles in physiotherapy practice: educating for self-management, relational matching, and coaching for everyday life. Physiother Theory Pract. 2016;32:591–602.
  • Arntzen C, Hamran T, Borg T. Body, participation and self transformations during and after in-patient stroke rehabilitation. Scandinav J Disabil Res. 2015;17:300–320.
  • Slomic M, Christiansen B, Soberg HL, et al. User involvement and experiential knowledge in interprofessional rehabilitation: a grounded theory study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:547.
  • Aadal L, Kirkevold M, Borg T. Neurorehabilitation analysed through ‘situated learning’ theory. Scandinav J Disabil Res. 2014;16:348–363.
  • Normann B, Sorgaard KW, Salvesen R, et al. Clinical guidance of community physiotherapists regarding people with MS: professional development and continuity of care. Physiother Res Int. 2014;19:25–33.
  • Molander B. Kunskap i handling [Knowledge in Action]. 2. omarb. uppl. ed. Göteborg: Daidalos; 1996. 286 s. p.
  • Wenger E. Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization 2000;7:225–246.
  • Solvang PK, Hanisch H, Reinhardt JD. The rehabilitation research matrix: producing knowledge at micro, meso, and macro levels. Disabil Rehabil. 2017; 39(19): 1983-1989.
  • Thornton PH, Ocasio W, Lounsbury M. The institutional logics perspective: a new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
  • Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24:105–112.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.