Which clinical and sociodemographic determinants are associated with self-perceived manual ability at one year after stroke?

References

• Persson HC, Parziali M, Danielsson A, et al. Outcome and upper extremity function within 72 hours after first occasion of stroke in an unselected population at a stroke unit. A part of the SALGOT study. BMC Neurol 2012;12:162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broeks JG, Lankhorst GJ, Rumping K, et al. The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study. Disabil Rehabil. 1999;21:357–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, et al. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:394–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendricks HT, van Limbeek J, Geurts AC, et al. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:1629–1637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, De Wit L, et al. Time course of trunk, arm, leg, and functional recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:173–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirbagheri MM, Rymer WZ. Time-course of changes in arm impairment after stroke: variables predicting motor recovery over 12 months. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:1507–1513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock A, Farmer SE, Brady MC, et al. Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;11:CD010820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R, et al. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9:e87987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011;377:1693–1702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Uswatte G, King DK, et al. A placebo-controlled trial of constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremity after stroke. Stroke. 2006;37:1045–1049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health 2001. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en. Accessed March 26, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart JC, Cramer SC. Patient-reported measures provide unique insights into motor function after stroke. Stroke 2013;44:1111–1116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lee JH, Beckerman H, Knol DL, et al. Clinimetric properties of the motor activity log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients. Stroke. 2004;35:1410–1414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penta M, Tesio L, Arnould C, et al. The ABILHAND questionnaire as a measure of manual ability in chronic stroke patients: Rasch-based validation and relationship to upper limb impairment. Stroke. 2001;32:1627–1634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alt Murphy M, Resteghini C, Feys P, et al. An overview of systematic reviews on upper extremity outcome measures after stroke. BMC Neurol. 2015;15:29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ. Predicting activities after stroke: what is clinically relevant? Int J Stroke. 2013;8:25–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira ND, Ovando AC, Michaelsen SM, et al. Motor Activity Log-Brazil: reliability and relationships with motor impairments in individuals with chronic stroke. Arq Neuro-Psiquiatr. 2012;70:196–201. Neuropsiquiatr.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basilio ML, de Faria-Fortini I, Polese JC, et al. Handgrip strength deficits best explain limitations in performing bimanual activities after stroke. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28:1161–1165.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris JE, Eng JJ. Paretic upper-limb strength best explains arm activity in people with stroke. Phys Ther. 2007;87:88–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekstrand E, Rylander L, Lexell J, et al. Perceived ability to perform daily hand activities after stroke and associated factors: a cross-sectional study. BMC Neurol. 2016;16:208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming MK, Newham DJ, Roberts-Lewis SF, et al. Self-perceived utilization of the paretic arm in chronic stroke requires high upper limb functional ability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:918–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer MJ, Pereira S, McClure A, et al. A systematic review of studies reporting multivariable models to predict functional outcomes after post-stroke inpatient rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:1316–1323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrea RE, Beiser AS, Seshadri S, et al. Gender differences in stroke incidence and poststroke disability in the Framingham heart study. Stroke. 2009;40:1032–1037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris JE, Eng JJ. Individuals with the dominant hand affected following stroke demonstrate less impairment than those with the nondominant hand affected. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006;20:380–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jellema S, van der Sande R, van Hees S, et al. Role of environmental factors on resuming valued activities poststroke: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative findings. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97:991–1002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmcrantz S, Widen Holmqvist L, Sommerfeld DK. Young individuals with stroke: a cross sectional study of long-term disability associated with self-rated global health. BMC Neurol. 2014;14:20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alt Murphy M, Persson HC, Danielsson A, et al. SALGOT – Stroke Arm Longitudinal study at the University of Gothenburg, prospective cohort study protocol. BMC Neurol. 2011;11:56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:344–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brott T, Adams HP, Jr., Olinger CP, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989;20:864–870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelros P, Terent A. Characteristics of the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale: results from a population-based stroke cohort at baseline and after one year. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;17:21–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7:13–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Wijck FM, Pandyan AD, Johnson GR, et al. Assessing motor deficits in neurological rehabilitation: patterns of instrument usage. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2001;15:23–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Propst M, Nelson SG. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Phys Ther. 1983;63:1606–1610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page SJ, Fulk GD, Boyne P. Clinically important differences for the upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer Scale in people with minimal to moderate impairment due to chronic stroke. Phys Ther. 2012;92:791–798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, et al. Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surg Am. 1984;9:222–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G, et al. Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985;66:69–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987;67:206–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregson JM, Leathley M, Moore AP, et al. Reliability of the Tone Assessment Scale and the modified Ashworth scale as clinical tools for assessing poststroke spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:1013–1016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res. 1981;4:483–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordin A, Alt Murphy M, Danielsson A. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability at the item level of the Action Research Arm Test for patients with stroke. J Rehabil Med 2014;46:738–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh CL, Hsueh IP, Chiang FM, et al. Inter-rater reliability and validity of the action research arm test in stroke patients. Age Ageing. 1998;27:107–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lee JH, De Groot V, Beckerman H, et al. The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:14–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lee JH, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, et al. The responsiveness of the Action Research Arm test and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale in chronic stroke patients. J Rehabil Med. 2001;33:110–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Expanded ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Ekstrand E, Lindgren I, Lexell J, et al. Test-retest reliability of the ABILHAND questionnaire in persons with chronic stroke. Pm R. 2014;6:324–331.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vittinghoff E, Glidden DV, Shiboski SC, et al. Regression methods in biostatistics: linear, logistic, survival, and repeated measures models. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Pan Y, Jackson RT. Insights into the ethnic differences in serum ferritin between black and white US adult men. Am J Hum Biol. 2008;20:406–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, et al. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 1988;19:604–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Lannin NA, Borschmann K, et al. Standardized measurement of sensorimotor recovery in stroke trials: consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. Int J Stroke. 2017;12:451–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashford S, Slade M, Malaprade F, et al. Evaluation of functional outcome measures for the hemiparetic upper limb: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40:787–795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt J, Hayward KS, Kwakkel G, et al. Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research: the stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable taskforce. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017;31:793–799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin MF, Kleim JA, Wolf SL. What do motor “recovery” and “compensation” mean in patients following stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:313–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen B. Recovery of sensory and motor function after nerve repair. A rationale for evaluation. J Hand Ther 1996;9:315–327.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bagg S, Pombo AP, Hopman W. Effect of age on functional outcomes after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 2002;33:179–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar