Prescribing upper limb orthoses for children with cerebral palsy: a Q methodology study of occupational therapists’ decision making

References

• Fleming MH. Clinical reasoning in medicine compared with clinical reasoning in occupational therapy. Am J Occup Ther. 1991;45:988–996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers JC. Eleanor Clarke Slagle lectureship—1983; clinical reasoning: the ethics, science, and art. Am J Occup Ther. 1983;37:601–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth C. Clinical reasoning: how do pragmatic reasoning, worldview and client-centredness fit? Br J Occup Ther. 2004;67:10–19.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn ES. Clinical reasoning: explicating complexity. Am J Occup Ther. 1991;45:969–971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattingly C. What is clinical reasoning? Am J Occup Ther. 1991;45:979–986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz KB. Clinical reasoning and new ideas on intelligence: implications for teaching and learning. Am J Occup Ther. 1991;45:1033–1037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harries PA, Harries C. Studying clinical reasoning, part 1: have we been taking the wrong ‘track’? Br J Occup Ther. 2001;64:164–168.
   Google Scholar
• Copley J, Kuipers K. Management of upper limb hypertonicity. San Antonio (TX): Therapy Skill Builders; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Kuipers K, Rassafiani M, Ashburner J, et al. Do clients with acquired brain injury use the splints prescribed by occupational therapists? A descriptive study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2009;24:365–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilton J. Orthotic intervention and casting in the presence of neurological dysfunction. Hand splinting orthotic intervention: principles of design and fabrication. 2nd ed. Western Australia: Vivid Publishing; 2013. p. 195–235.
   Google Scholar
• Copley J, Kuipers K. The hypertonicity intervention planning model for upper limb neurorehabilitation. In Neurorehabilitation of the upper limb across the lifespan: managing hypertonicity for optimal function. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2014. p. 54–79.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. International classification of functioning, disability, and health: children & youth version: ICF-CY. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Kuipers K, McKenna K, Carlson G. Factors influencing occupational therapists’ clinical decision making for clients with upper limb performance dysfunction following brain injury. Br J Occup Ther. 2006;69:106–114.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming MH. The therapist with the three-track mind. Am J Occup Ther. 1991;45:1007–1014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattingly C, Fleming MH. Clinical reasoning: forms of inquiry in a therapeutic practice. Duxbury (VT): F.A. Davis; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Barbosa JC, Willoughby P, Rosenberg CA, et al. Statistical methodology: VII. Q‐methodology, a structural analytic approach to medical subjectivity. Acad Emerg Med. 1998;5:1032–1040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth C, Baker A. A systematic review of professional reasoning literature in occupational therapy. Br J Occup Ther. 2016;79:5–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper B. The relationship between pretheoretical assumptions and clinical reasoning. Am J Occup Ther. 1997;51:328–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigger U, Mrtek RG. Use of Q-technique to examine attitudes of entering pharmacy students toward their profession. Am J Pharm Educ. 1994;58:8–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett S, Hoffmann T, McCluskey A, et al. Introducing OTseeker (occupational therapy systematic evaluation of evidence): a new evidence database for occupational therapists. Am J Occup Ther. 2003;57:635–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lannin N, Novak I. Jackman M. Orthotics. In: Curtin M, Egan M, Adams J, editors. Occupational therapy for people experiencing illness, injury or impairment: promoting occupation and participation. 7th ed. New York (NY): Elsevier; 2017. p. 541–58.
   Google Scholar
• Wagman P, Hakansson C, Jacobsson C, et al. What is considered important for life balance? Similarities and differences among some working adults. Scand J Occup Ther. 2012;19:377–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackman M, Novak I, Lannin N. Effectiveness of hand splints in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014;56:138–147.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Novak I, McIntyre S, Morgan C, et al. A systematic review of interventions for children with cerebral palsy: state of the evidence. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013;55:885–910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown SR. A primer on Q methodology. Operant Subject. 1993;16:91–138.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis KE. Q methodology: relevance and application to nursing research. Ans Adv Nurs Sci. 1986;8:6–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dziopa F, Ahern K. A systematic literature review of the applications of Q-technique and its methodology. Methodology. 2011;7:39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Exel J, De Graaf G. Q methodology: a sneak preview. 2005. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228574836_Q_Methodology_A_Sneak_Preview
   Google Scholar
• Corr S. Explrong perceptions about services using Q-sort methodology. In: Kielhofner G, editor. Research in occupational therapy: methods of inquiry for enhancing practice. Duxbury (VT): F.A. Davis; 2006. p. 389–400.
   Google Scholar
• Newman I, Ramlo S. SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2010. Available from: http://methods.sagepub.com/book/sage-handbook-of-mixed-methods-social-behavioral-research-2e
   Google Scholar
• Watts S, Stenner P. Doing Q methodological research: theory, method and interpretation. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Brown SR. On the use of variance designs in Q methodology. Psychol Rec. 1970;20:179–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chee DY, Lee HC, Falkmer M, et al. Viewpoints on driving of individuals with and without autism spectrum disorder. Dev Neurorehabil. 2015;18:26–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donner JC. Using Q-sorts in participatory processes: an introduction to the methodology. Social Development Papers; Paper No. 36. Washington (DC): Social Development Department; 2001; p. 24–49.
   Google Scholar
• Brown SR. Q methodology. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2008. Available from: http://sk.sagepub.com/reference/research
   Google Scholar
• Corr S. An introduction to Q methodology, a research technique. Br J Occup Ther. 2001;64:293–297.
   Google Scholar
• Cross RM. Exploring attitudes: the case for Q methodology. Health Educ Res. 2004;20:206–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie J, Braswell B, Jelsma J, et al. A case for the use of Q-methodology in disability research: lessons learned from a training workshop. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:2134–2141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garbellini S, Robert Y, Randall M, et al. Rationale for prescription, and effectiveness of, upper limb orthotic intervention for children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;40:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson M, Elliott C, Willis C, et al. Can, want and try: parents’ viewpoints regarding the participation of their child with an acquired brain injury. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0157951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts S, Stenner P. Doing Q methodology: theory, method and interpretation. Qual Res Psychol. 2005;2:67–91.
   Google Scholar
• Banasick S. Ken-Q Analysis (Version 0.11.1): Free Software Foundation. 2018. Available from: https://shawnbanasick.github.io/ken-q-analysis/#section1
   Google Scholar
• Coakes SJ. SPSS: analysis without anguish: version 17.0 for windows/Sheridan J. Coakes, Lyndall Steed, Clara Ong. Milton, QLD, Australia: Wiley; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens J. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. 4th ed. Mahwah (NJ): Erlbaum; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• McKeown B, Thomas D. Q Methodology. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications Inc.; 2013 [rom: URL|.
   Google Scholar
• Brown SR. Political subjectivity: applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Atchley WR. Introduction to principal components analysis Online. 2007. [cited 2018 Feb 18]. Available from: ftp://statgen.ncsu.edu/pub/thorne/molevoclass/AtchleyOct19.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Occupational Therapy Board of Australia. Registrant data. 2017. Available from: http://www.occupationaltherapyboard.gov.au/About/Statistics.aspx
   Google Scholar
• King G, Currie M, Bartlett DJ, et al. The development of expertise in paediatric rehabilitation therapists: the roles of motivation, openness to experience, and types of caseload experience. Aust Occup Ther J. 2008;55:108–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher A, Bray Jones K. Occupational therapy intervention process model. In: Hinojoa J, Kramer P, Royeen C, editors. Perspectives on human occupation: theories underlying practice. Philadelphia (PA): F.A. Davis; 2017. p. 237–286.
   Google Scholar
• Boniface G, Fedden T, Hurst H, et al. Using theory to underpin an integrated occupational therapy service through the Canadian model of occupational performance. Br J Occup Ther. 2008;71:531–539.
   Google Scholar
• Boniface G, Seymour A. Using occupational therapy theory in practice. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Laver-Fawcett A. Canadian model of occupational performance: 30 years of impact. Br J Occup Ther. 2013;76:519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copley J, Kuipers K. Neurorehabilitation of the upper limb across the lifespan: managing hypertonicity for optimal function. West Sussex (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Wilton J. Hand splinting orthotic intervention: principles of design and fabrication. 2nd ed. Fremantle, Australia: Vivid Publishing; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Parker D. An exploration of client-centred practice in occupational therapy: perspectives and impact [Ph.D. thesis]. Birmingham (UK): University of Birmingham; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Sumsion T, Law M. A review of evidence on the conceptual elements informing client-centred practice. Can J Occup Ther. 2006;73:153–162.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Australian Hand Therapy Association. Australian hand therapy association hand and upper limb orthosis/splint schedule. Online. West Busselton, Australia: Australian Hand Therapy Association; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Colditz JC. Principles of splinting and splint prescription. In: Peimer CA, editor. Surgery of the hand and upper extremity. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill, Health Professions Division; 1996. p. 2389–2410.
   Google Scholar
• Fess EE, Gettle KS, Philips CA, et al. Hand and upper extremity splinting: principles and methods. St Louis (MO): Mosby Inc.; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• American Society of Hand Therapists. Splint classification system. Online. Mount Laurel (NJ): American Society of Hand Therapists; 1992.
   Google Scholar