Effectiveness of a manualised group training intervention for memory dysfunction following stroke: a series of single case studies

References

• Jokinen H, Melkas S, Ylikoski R, et al. Post-stroke cognitive impairment is common even after successful clinical recovery. Eur J Neurol. 2015;22(9):1288–1294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalaria RN, Ballard C. Stroke and cognition. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2001;3(4):334–339.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sheldon S, Winocur G. Memory loss after stroke. In: Schweizer A, Macdonald RL, editors. The behavioural consequences of stroke Torrance: CA: Western Psychological Services; 2014. p. 151–176.
   Google Scholar
• Nys GM, van Zandvoort MJ, van der Worp HB, et al. Early cognitive impairment predicts long-term depressive symptoms and quality of life after stroke. J Neurol Sci. 2006;247(2):149–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viscogliosi C, Desrosiers J, Belleville S, et al. Differences in participation according to specific cognitive deficits following a stroke. Appl Neuropsychol. 2011;18(2):117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. Walk in our shoes. Stroke survivors and carers report on support after stroke. Melbourne: National Stroke Foundation; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Glisky EL. Disorders of memory. In: Ponsford J, editor. Cognitive and behavioral rehabilitation: from neurobiology to clinical practice. New York: Guilford Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew NE, Kilkenny M, Naylor R, et al. Understanding long-term unmet needs in Australian survivors of stroke. Int J Stroke. 2014;9 (A100):106–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKevitt C, Fudge N, Redfern J, et al. Self-reported long-term needs after stroke. Stroke. 2011;42(5):1398–1403. PubMed PMID: 21441153; eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velikonja D, Tate R, Ponsford J, et al. INCOG recommendations for management of cognition following traumatic brain injury, part V: memory. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014;29(4):369–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD, Langenbahn DM, Braden C, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:519–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson M, Cullen B, McGee-Lennon M, et al. Technological memory aid use by people with acquired brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2015;27(6):919–936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neil-Pirozzi TM, Kennedy MR, Sohlberg MM. Evidence-based practice for the use of internal strategies as a memory compensation technique after brain injury: a systematic review. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016;31(4):E1–E11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• das Nair R, Cogger H, Worthington E, et al. Cognitive rehabilitation for memory deficits after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fish JE, Manly T, Kopelman MD, et al. Errorless learning of prospective memory tasks: an experimental investigation in people with memory disorders. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2015;25(2):159–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manasse NJ, Hux K, Snell J. Teaching face-name associations to survivors of traumatic brain injury: a sequential treatment approach. Brain injury. 2005;19(8):633–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thickpenny-Davis KL, Barker-Collo SL. Evaluation of a structured group format memory rehabilitation program for adults following brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2007;22(5):303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson BA. Memory rehabilitation: integrating theory and practice. New York: NY: The Guilford Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• das Nair R, Lincoln NB. Evaluation of rehabilitation of memory in neurological disabilities (ReMiND): a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2012;26(10):894–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radford KA, Lah S, Thayer Z, et al. Improving memory in outpatients with neurological disorders using a group-based training program. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012;18(4):738–748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller LA, Radford K. Testing the effectiveness of group-based memory rehabilitation in chronic stroke patients. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24(5):721-737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate RL, Perdices M, McDonald S, et al. The design, conduct and report of single-case research: resources to improve the quality of the neurorehabilitation literature. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24(3–4):315–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham JE, Karmarkar AM, Ottenbacher KJ. Small sample research designs for evidence-based rehabilitation: issues and methods. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(8):S111–S116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Royle J, Lincoln NB. The Everyday Memory Questionnaire-revised: development of a 13-item scale. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(2):114–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shum D, Fleming J. Manual for the comprehensive assessment of prospective memory. Queensland, Australia: ASSBI; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Roche NL, Fleming JM, Shum DHK. Self-awareness of prospective memory failure in adults with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury. 2002;16(11):931–945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau LT, Lee JB, Fleming J, et al. Reliability and normative data for the comprehensive assessment of prospective memory (CAPM). Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2007;17(6):707–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiresuk TJ, Sherman RE. Goal attainment scaling: a general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Commun Mental Health J. 1968;4(6):443–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovend'Eerdt TJ, Botell RE, Wade DT. Writing SMART rehabilitation goals and achieving goal attainment scaling: a practical guide. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23(4):352–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L. Goal attainment scaling (GAS) in rehabilitation: a practical guide. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23(4):362–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwens SF, van Heugten CM, Verhey FR. The practical use of goal attainment scaling for people with acquired brain injury who receive cognitive rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23(4):310–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L, Williams H, Johnson J. Goal attainment scaling: does it provide added value as a person-centred measure for evaluation of outcome in neurorehabilitation following acquired brain injury? J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(7):528–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt M. Rey auditory verbal learning test: a handbook. Torrance: CA: Western Psychological Services; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Benedict RBH. The Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised: professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Benedict RBH, Schretlen D, Groninger L, et al. Revision of the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test: studies of normal performance, reliability, and validity. Psychol Assess. 1996;8(2):145–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. WMS-IV technical and interpretive manual San Antonio, TX: Pearson, Inc.; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. WAIS-IV technical and interpretive manual. San Antonio, TX: Pearson, Inc.; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Radford KA, Say M, Thayer Z, et al. Making the most of your memory: an everyday memory skills program. Sydney: New South Whales: ASSBI; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Tate RL, Rosenkoetter U, Wakim D, et al. The Risk of Bias in N-of-1 Trials (RoBiNT) Scale: an expanded manual for the critical appraisal of single-case reports. Sydney Australia: Author; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Tate RL, Perdices M, Rosenkoetter U, et al. The Single-Case Reporting guideline In BEhavioural interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 statement. J School Psychol. 2016;56:133–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin K-J, Sinclair EJ, dasNair R. Descriptions of memory rehabilitation group interventions for neurological conditions: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2015;30(7):705–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane JD, Gast DL. Visual analysis in single case experimental design studies: brief review and guidelines. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24(3–4):445–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasny-Pacini A, Evans J. Single-case experimental designs to assess intervention effectiveness in rehabilitation: a practical guide. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;61(3):164–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manolov R. R syntax: projection of baseline trend with construction of envelope. 2014. Available from: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/5z9p5362bwlbj7d/ProjectTrend.R2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kratochwill TR, Levin JR. Enhancing the scientific credibility of single-case intervention research: randomization to the rescue. Psychol Methods. 2010;15(2):124–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manolov R, Losada JL, Chacon-Moscoso S, et al. Analyzing two-phase single-case data with non-overlap and mean difference indices: illustration, software tools, and alternatives. Front Psychol. 2016;7:32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulté I, Onghena P. When the truth hits you between the eyes: a software tool for the visual analysis of single-case experimental data. Methodology. 2012;8(3):104–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auerbach C, Zeitlin W. SSD for R: a comprehensive statistical package to analyze single-system data. Vol. 23. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Parker RI, Vannest KJ, Davis JL, et al. Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behav Ther. 2011;42(2):284–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannest J, Ninci J. Evaluating intervention effects in single‐case research designs. J Counsel Dev. 2015;93(4):403–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brossart DF, Vannest KJ, Davis JL, et al. Incorporating nonoverlap indices with visual analysis for quantifying intervention effectiveness in single-case experimental designs. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24(3-4):464–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannest J, Parker RI, Gonen O, et al. Single Case Research: web based calculators for SCR analysis. (Version 2.0) [Web-based application]. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University; 2016. Available from: singlecaseresearch.org.
   Google Scholar
• Perdices M. How do you know whether your patient is getting better (or worse)? A user's guide. Brain Impairment. 2012;6(3):219–226.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson NS, Truax P. Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991;59(1):12–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devilly GJ. ClinTools Software for Windows: Version 4 (computer programme): Psytek Ltd.; 2005. Available from: www.clintools.com
   Google Scholar
• Spooner DM, Pachana NA. Ecological validity in neuropsychological assessment: a case for greater consideration in research with neurologically intact populations. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006;21(4):327–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geusgens CA, Winkens I, van Heugten CM, et al. Occurrence and measurement of transfer in cognitive rehabilitation: a critical review. J Rehabilitation Med. 2007;39(6):425–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keefe RS, Kraemer HC, Epstein RS, et al. Defining a clinically meaningful effect for the design and interpretation of randomized controlled trials. Innovat Clin Neurosci. 2013;10(5–6 A):4s–19s.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Page P. Beyond statistical significance: clinical interpretation of rehabilitation research literature Int J Sports Physl Ther. 2014;9(5):726–736.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Withiel TD, Sharp VL, Wong KL, et al. Understanding the experience of compensatory and restorative memory rehabilitation: a qualitative study of stroke survivors. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2018;11:1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar