Factors related to the use of magnifying low vision aids: a scoping review

References

• Woolhead G, Calnan M, Dieppe P, et al. Dignity in older age: what do older people in the United Kingdom think? Age Ageing. 2004;33(2):165–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Global age-frendly cities: a guide. Geneva (CH): WHO; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Tomita MR, Mann WC, Fraas LF, et al. Predictors of the use of assistive devices that address physical impairments among community-based frail elders. J Appl Gerontol. 2004;23(2):141–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraskowsky LH, Finlayson M. Factors affecting older adults' use of adaptive equipment: review of the literature. Am J Occup Ther. 2001;55(3):303–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Sax C, Vanbiervliet A, et al. Predictors of assistive technology use: the importance of personal and psychosocial factors. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(21):1321–1331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper P, Jutai JW, Strong G, et al. Age-related macular degeneration and low-vision rehabilitation: a systematic review. Can J Ophthalmol. 2008;43(2):180–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robillard N, Overbury O. Quebec model for low vision rehabilitation. Can J Ophthalmol. 2006;41(3):362–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty BE, Kehler KB, Jamara R, et al. Abandonment of low-vision devices in an outpatient population. Optom Vis Sci. 2011;88(11):1283–1287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congdon N, O'Colmain B, Klaver CC, et al. Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122(4):477–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIlwaine GG, Bell JA, Dutton GN. Low vision aids - Is our service cost effective? Eye. 1991;5(5):607–611.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watson GR, De l'Aune W, Stelmack J, et al. National survey of the impact of low vision device use among veterans. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74(5):249–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott AJ. Poor vision and the elderly–a domiciliary study. Eye (Lond). 1989;3(Pt 3):365–369.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wessels R, Dijcks B, Soede M, et al. Non-use of provided assistive technology devices, a literature overview. Technol Disabil. 2003;15(4):231–238.
   Google Scholar
• Federici S, Meloni F, Borsci S. The abandonment of assistive technology in Italy: a survey of National Health Service users. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2016;52(4):516–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O'Brien KK, et al. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(12):1291–1294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health. 2000;23(4):334–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan B, Khadka J, Bunce C, Court H. Effectiveness of the community-based Low Vision Service Wales: A long-term outcome study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97(4):487–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gothwal VK, Thomas R, Crossland M, et al. Randomized trial of tablet computers for education and learning in children and young people with low vision. Optom Vis Sci. 2018;95(9):873–882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leat SJ, Fryer A, Rumney NJ. Outcome of low vision aid provision: the effectiveness of a low vision clinic. Optom Vis Sci. 1994;71(3):199–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper R, Doorduyn K, Reeves B, et al. Evaluating the outcomes of low vision rehabilitation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1999;19(1):3–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodrich GL, Mehr EB, Darling NC. Parameters in the use of CCTV's and optical aids. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1980;57(12):881–892.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bischoff P. Long-term results of low vision rehabilitation in age-related macular degeneration. Doc Ophthalmol. 1995;89(4):305–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan IM, Friedman GR, Ho PC, et al. Low-vision aids for patients with suboptimal vision after closed vitrectomy for diabetic vitreous hemorrhage. Ophthalmology. 1984;91(5):458–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom AA. Prognostic factors in the visual rehabilitation of aging patients. New Outlook Blind. 1974;68(3):124–127.
   Google Scholar
• Bachofer CS. Long-term optical device use by young adults with low vision [Dissertation]. Nashville: Vanderbilt University; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Rinnert T, Lindner H, Behrens-Baumann W. At home utilization of low-vision aids by the visually impaired. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1999;215(5):305–310.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demirkilinc E, Palamar M, Uretmen O. Low vision aids: the effectiveness of low vision rehabilitation. Turk Klin Tip Etigi Hukuku Tarihi. 2013;33(4):981–986.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein RB, Dugan E, Trachtenberg F, et al. The impact of a video intervention on the use of low vision assistive devices. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84(3):208–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker S, Wahl HW, Schilling O, et al. Assistive device use in visually impaired older adults: role of control beliefs. Gerontologist. 2005;45(6):739–746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson G, De l'Aune W, Long S, et al. Veterans' use of low vision devices for reading. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74(5):260–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton M, Nieuwenhuijsen ER, Epstein MJ. Computer-related assistive technology: satisfaction and experiences among users with disabilities. Assist Technol. 2008;20(2):99–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanninen KA, Bates SS, Thume L. Low vision aids: students' experiences. J Vis Impair Blind. 1977;71(3):113–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson U, Nilsson S. Rehabilitation of the visually handicapped with advanced macular degeneration. A follow-up study at the Low Vision Clinic, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Linköping. Doc Ophthalmol. 1986;62(4):345–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copolillo A, Teitelman JL. Acquisition and integration of low vision assistive devices: understanding the decision-making process of older adults with low vision. Am J Occup Ther. 2005;59(3):305–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. Development of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST). Assist Technol. 1996;8(1):3–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zammitt N, O’Hare A, Mason J, et al. Use of low vision aids by children attending a centralized multidisciplinary visual impairment service. J Vis Impair Blind. 1999;93(6):351–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greig D, West M, Overbury O. Successful use of low vision aids: visual and psychological factors. J Vis Impair Blind. 1986;80(10):985–988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leat S, Rumney N. The experience of a university-based low vision clinic. Ophthalm Physiol Opt. 1990;10(1):8–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphry R, Thompson G. Low vision aids- evaluation in ageneral eye department. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK. 1986;105(Pt 3):296–303.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Day HY, Jutai J, Woolrich W, et al. The stability of impact of assistive devices. Disabil Rehabil. 2001;23(9):400–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vash CL, Crewe NM. Psychology of disability. 2 ed. New York: Springer Pub; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• National Eye Institute. Low vision focus groups final report: ophthalmologists, optometrists, and office staff. Bethesda (MD): NEI; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell J, Bradley C. Quality of life in age-related macular degeneration: a review of the literature. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overbury O, West M. The psychodynamics of low vision: a preliminary study. J Vis Impair Blind. 1982;76:101–105.
   Google Scholar
• Chaves ES, Cooper RA, Collins DM, et al. Review of the use of physical restraints and lap belts with wheelchair users. Assist Technol. 2007;19(2):94–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lansley P, McCreadie C, Tinker A. Can adapting the homes of older people and providing assistive technology pay its way? Age Ageing. 2004;33(6):571–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandtstadter J, Renner G. Tenacious goal pursuit and flexible goal adjustment: explication and age-related analysis of assimilative and accommodative strategies of coping. Psychol Aging. 1990;5(1):58–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers JC, Holms MB. Assistive technology device use un patients with rheumatic disease: a literature review. Am J Occup Ther. 1992;46(2):120–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batavia AI, Hammer GS. Toward the development of consumer-bases criteria for the evaluation of assistive devices. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1990;27(4):425–436.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelly SM, Smith DW. The use of assistive technology by high school students with visual impairments: a second look at the current problem. J Vis Impair Blind. 2011;105(4):235–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser SA, Kenyon V, Lagace M, et al. Stereotypes associated with age-related conditions and assistive device use in canadian media. Gerontologist. 2016;56(6):1023–1032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copolillo AE. Use of mobility devices: the decision making process of nine African-American older adults. OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2001;21(3):185–200.
   Google Scholar
• Mann WC, Tomita M. Perspectives on assistive devices among elderly persons with disabilities. Technol Disabil. 1998;8:119–148.
   Google Scholar
• Gitlin LN, Burgh D. Issuing assistive devices to older patients in rehabilitation: an exploratory study. Am J Occup Ther. 1995;49(10):994–1000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwarsson S, Björn S. The housing enabler. an instrument for assessing and analysing accessibility problems in housing. Lund (SE): Veten & Skapen HB & Slaug Data Management; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Guerette A, Lewis S, Mattingly C. Students with low vision describe their visual impairments and visual functioning. J Vis Impair Blind. 2011;105(5):287–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce I, McKennell A, Walker E. Blind and partially sighted adults in Britain: The RNIB Survey. London: H.M.S.O; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Vitale S, Cotch MF, Sperduto RD. Prevalence of visual impairment in the United States. JAMA. 2006;295(18):2158–2163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson U. Visual rehabilitation with and without educationa; training in the use of optical aids and residual vision. A prospective study of patients with age-related macular degeneration. Doc Ophthalmol. 1986;62:369–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuttleworth GN, Dunlop A, Collins JK, et al. How effective is an integrated approach to low vision rehabilitation? Two years follow-up results from South Devon. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995;79:719–723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Allura T, McInerney R, Horowitz A. An evaluation of low vision services. J Vis Impair Blind. 1995;89(6):3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day H, Jutai J, Campbell KA. Development of a scale to measure the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: lessons learned and the road ahead. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(1-3):31–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrice E, Johnson AP, Marinier JA, et al. Assessment of the Apple iPad as a low-vision reading aid. Eye (Lond). 2017;31(6):865–871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ. Outcomes of assistive technology use on quality of life. Disabil Rehabil. 1996;18(9):439–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaPlante MP, Hendershot GE, Moss AJ. Assistive technology devices and home accessibility features: prevalence, payment, need, and trends. Adv Data. 1992(217):1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scherer MJ. The impact of assistive technology on the lives of people with dissabilities. In: Gray DB, Quatrano LA, Lieberman ML, editors. Designing and using assistive technology: the human perspective. Baltimore (MD): Brookes Publishing Co; 1997. p. 99–115.
   Google Scholar
• Janz NK, Becker MH. The Health Belief Model: a decade later. Health Educ Q. 1984;11(1):1–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Starace F, Massa A, Amico KR, et al. Adherence to antiretroviral therapy: an empirical test of the information-motivation-behavioral skills model. Health Psychol. 2006;25(2):153–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CH, Wu JR, Yen M, et al. A model of medication-taking behavior in elderly individuals with chronic disease. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2007;22(5):359–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livi S, Zeri F, Baroni R. Health beliefs affect the correct replacement of daily disposable contact lenses: predicting compliance with the Health Belief Model and the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2017;40(1):25–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. Int J Man Mach Stud. 1993;38(3):475–487.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris M, Davis G, et al. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. Mis Quart. 2003;27(3):425–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peek ST, Wouters EJ, van Hoof J, et al. Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83(4):235–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICF. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Arthanat S, Bauer SM, Lenker JA, et al. Conceptualization and measurement of assistive technology usability. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2(4):235–248.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Conn VS, Enriquez M, Ruppar TM, et al. Meta-analyses of theory use in medication adherence intervention research. Am J Health Behav. 2016;40(2):155–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conn VS, Hafdahl AR, Mehr DR. Interventions to increase physical activity among healthy adults: meta-analysis of outcomes. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(4):751–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittich W, Jarry J, Morrice E, et al. Effectiveness of the Apple iPad as a spot-reading magnifier. Optom Vis Sci. 2018;95(9):704–710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar