Engagement in rehabilitation therapy and functional outcomes among individuals with acquired brain injuries

References

• Chua KSG, Ng YS, Yap SGM. A brief review of traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2007;36:31–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Bigler ED, et al. Neuropsychological assessment. 5 ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kwasnica C, Brown AW, Elovic EP, et al. Congenital and acquired brain injury. 3. Spectrum of the acquired brain injury population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:S15–S20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewan MC, Rattani A, Gupta S, et al. Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2018;1:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Feigin VL, Krishnamurthi RV, Parmar P, et al. Update on the global burden of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke in 1990-2013: the GBD 2013 study. Neuroepidemiology. 2015;45:161–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrift AG, Thayabaranathan T, Howard G, et al. Global stroke statistics. Int J Stroke. 2017;12:13–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trombly CA, Radomski MV, Trexel C, et al. Occupational therapy and achievement of self-identified goals by adults with acquired brain injury: phase II. Am J Occup Ther. 2002;56:489–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steultjens EMJ, Dekker J, Bouter LM, et al. Evidence of the efficacy of occupational therapy in different conditions: an overview of systematic reviews. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:247–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babulal GM, Foster ER, Wolf TJ. Facilitating transfer of skills and strategies in occupational therapy practice: practical application of transfer principles. Asian J Occup Ther. 2016;11:19–25.
   Google Scholar
• Krasny-Pacini A, Chevignard M, Evans J. Goal management training for rehabilitation of executive functions: a systematic review of effectiveness in patients with acquired brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:105–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf TJ, Doherty M, Kallogjeri D, et al. The feasibility of using metacognitive strategy training to improve cognitive performance and neural connectivity in women with chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment. Oncology. 2016;91:143–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung SH, Kim JH, Yong SY, et al. Effect of task-specific lower extremity training on cognitive and gait function in stroke patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Rehabil Med. 2019;43:1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Houldin A, McEwen SE, Howell MW, et al. The cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance approach and transfer: a scoping review. OTJR. 2018;38:157–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams RJ. Improving health outcomes with better patient understanding and education. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2010;3:61–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bright FAS, Kayes NM, Worrall L, et al. A conceptual review of engagement in healthcare and rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:643–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lequerica AH, Rapport LJ, Whitman RD, et al. Psychometric properties of the Rehabilitation Therapy Engagement Scale when used among individuals with acquired brain injury. Rehabil Psychol. 2006; 51:331–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barello S, Graffigna G, Vegni E. Patient engagement as an emerging challenge for healthcare services: mapping the literature. Nurs Res Pract. 2012;2012:905934–905934.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kortte KB, Falk LD, Castillo RC, et al. The Hopkins rehabilitation engagement rating scale: development and psychometric properties. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:877–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medley AR, Powell T. Motivational interviewing to promote self-awareness and engagement in rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: a conceptual review. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2010;20:481–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson S, Krogstad JM, Finset A. mood in acquired brain damage: relationship to lesion localization and psychophysiological reactivity. Psychol Med. 1999;29:447–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane-Brown AT, Tate RL. Apathy after traumatic brain injury: an overview of the current state of play. Brain Impair. 2011;12:43–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesniak MM, Mazurkiewicz P, Iwanski S. Effects of group versus individual therapy for patients with memory disorder after an acquired brain injury: a randomized, controlled study. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2018;40:853–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald BC, Flashman LA, Saykin AJ. Executive dysfunction following traumatic brain injury: neural substrates and treatment strategies. Neurorehabilitation. 2002;17:333–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenze EJ, Munin MC, Dew MA, et al. Adverse effects of depression and cognitive impairment on rehabilitation participation and recovery from hip fracture. Int J Geriat Psychiatry. 2004;19:472–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz EC, King SD, Schwartz RP, et al. Cognitive ability as a factor in engagement in drug abuse treatment. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2005;31:359–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skidmore ER, Whyte EM, Holm MB, et al. Cognitive and affective predictors of rehabilitation participation after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:203–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kringle EA, Terhorst L, Butters MA, et al. Clinical predictors of engagement in inpatient rehabilitation among stroke survivors with cognitive deficits: an exploratory study. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2018;24:572–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Test of premorbid functioning. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Randolph C. Repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status (RBANS). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Reitan RM, Wolfson D. The Halstead–Reitan neuropsychological test battery: theory and clinical interpretation. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Heaton RK, Grant I, Matthews CG. Revised comprehensive norms for an expanded Halstead-Reitan Battery: demographically adjusted neuropsychological norms for African American and Caucasian adults. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Golden C. Stroop color and word test manual. Wood Dale, IL: Stoelting; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass H, Kaplan E, Barresi B. The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Salvi F, Miller MD, Grilli A, et al. A manual of guidelines to score the Modified Cumulative Illness Rating Scale and its validation in acute hospitalized elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56:1926–1931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Libero F, Fargnoli M, Pittiglio S, et al. Comorbidity and rehabilitation. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2001;32:15–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holcomb EM, Millis SR, Hanks RA. Comorbid disease in persons with traumatic brain injury: descriptive findings using the Modified Cumulative Illness Rating Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:1338–1342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54:1063–1070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derogatis LR. Brief symptom inventory 18: administration, scoring, and procedures manual. Minneapolis: NCS Pearson; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Marin RS, Biedrzycki RC, Firinciogullari S. Reliability and validity of the Apathy Evaluation Scale. Psychiatry Res. 1991;38:143–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanks RA, Rapport LJ, Waldron-Perrine B, et al. Role of character strengths in outcome after mild complicated to severe traumatic brain injury: a positive psychology study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:2096–2102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juengst SB, Switzer G, Oh BM, et al. Conceptual model and cluster analysis of behavioral symptoms in two cohorts of adults with traumatic brain injuries. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2017;39:513–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meachen S-J, Hanks RA, Millis SR, et al. The reliability and validity of the Brief Symptom inventory-18 in persons with traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:958–965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsalve BC, Laxe S, Guitart MB, et al. Behavioral scales used in severe and moderate traumatic brain injury. Neurorehabilitation. 2014;35:67–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishman KN, Ashbaugh AR, Lanctot KL, et al. Apathy, not depressive symptoms, as a predictor of semantic and phonemic fluency task performance in stroke and transient ischemic attack. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2018;40:449–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hobart JC, Lamping DL, Freeman JA, et al. Evidence-based measurement: which disability scale for neurologic rehabilitation? Neurology. 2001; 57:639–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9:179–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallo JJ, Paveza GJ, Activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living assessment. In: Gallo JJ, Bogner HR, Fulmer T, et al. editors. Handbook of geriatric assessment, 4th ed. Burlington, (MA): Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2006. p. 193–240.
   Google Scholar
• Hilgenkamp TIM, van Wijck R, Evenhuis HM. Instrumental activities of daily living in older adults with intellectual disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32:1977–1987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics, 7th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Education; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51:1173–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, (NJ): L. Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Danzl MM, Etter NM, Andreatta RD, et al. Facilitating neurorehabilitation through principles of engagement. J Allied Health. 2012;41:35–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lenze EJ, Host HH, Hildebrand MW, et al. Enhanced medical rehabilitation increases therapy intensity and engagement and improves functional outcomes in postacute rehabilitation of older adults: a randomized-controlled trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012;13:708–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brett CE, Sykes C, Pires-Yfantouda R. Interventions to increase engagement with rehabilitation in adults with acquired brain injury: a systematic review. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2017;27:959–982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte E, Skidmore E, Aizenstein H, et al. Cognitive impairment in acquired brain injury: a predictor of rehabilitation outcomes and an opportunity for novel interventions. PM&R. 2011;3:S45–S51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lequerica AH, Kortte K. Therapeutic engagement: a proposed model of engagement in medical rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;89:415–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar