What place is there for shared housing with individualized disability support?

References

• Needham C, Glasby J, editors. Debates in personalisation. Bristol: Policy Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Purcal C, Fisher KR, Meltzer A. Social insurance for individualised disability support: Implementing the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme. In: Hudson J, Needham C, Fenger M, editors. Social policy review 28: analysis and debate in social policy. Bristol: Policy Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• CRPD. UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. United Nations; 2006. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?id=259.
   Google Scholar
• Ungerson C, Yeandle S. Cash for care in developed welfare states. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave McMillan; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Purcal C, Fisher KR, Jones A. Supported accommodation evaluation framework summary report. SPRC Report 31/2014. Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre, UNSW Australia; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson H, Needham C, Sullivan H. Individual funding for disability support: what are the implications for accountability? Austral J Public Administ. 2014;73:417–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones K, Netten A, Rabiee P, et al. Can individual budgets have an impact on carers and the caring role? Ageing Soc. 2014;34:157–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beresford P. Time to get real about personalisation. J Integrated Care. 2008;16:2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Manthorpe J, Stevens M, Challis D, et al. Individual budget projects come under the microscope. Mental Health Today (Brighton, England). 2008;12:22–26.
   Google Scholar
• Collings S, Dew A, and, Dowse L. Support planning with people with intellectual disability and complex support needs in the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme. J Intell Dev Disab. 2016;41:1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson C. Independent living. In: Watson N, Roulstone A, Thomas C, editors. Routledge handbook of disability studies. Abingdon: Routledge; 2012. p. 240–252.
   Google Scholar
• Slasberg C, Watson N, Beresford P, et al. Personalization of health care in England: have the wrong lessons been drawn from the personal health budget pilots?. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2014;19:183–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher KR, Parker S, Purcal C, et al. Effectiveness of supported living in relation to shared accommodation. Report prepared for the Disability Policy and Research Working Group. Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Carey G, Malbon E, Olney S, et al. The personalisation agenda: the case of the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme. Int Rev Sociol. 2018;28:20–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald F, Charlesworth S. Cash for care under the NDIS: shaping care workers’ working conditions? J Ind Relat. 2016;58:627–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gooding P. Navigating the flashing amber lights of the right to legal capacity in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Responding to major concerns. Human Rights Law Rev. 2015;15:45–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson K. The UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: a framework for ethical and inclusive practice? Ethics Social Welfare. 2013;7:218–231.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesel I, Fincher R. The choice agenda in disability housing provision. Housing Studies. 2009;24:611–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson K, Walmsley J. People with intellectual disabilities: towards a good life? Bristol: The Policy Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• French S, Swain J. Housing: the user’s perspective. In Clutton S, Grisbrooke J, Pengelly S, editors. Occupational therapy in housing. Jersey: John Wiley and Sons; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Parker S, Fisher KR. Facilitators and barriers in Australian disability housing support policies: using a human rights framework. Disability Studies Quart. 2010;30.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison M. Defining housing quality and environment: disability, standards and social factors. Housing Studies. 2004;19:691–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson G, Gronda H, Coutts S. On the outside: pathways in and out of homelessness. Melbourne: Australian Scholarly Publishing; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Drake G, Herbert JL. Leaving a licensed boarding house: transcending trans-institutionalisation with person-centred transitions. Disab Soc. 2015;30:583–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesel I. Housing for people with intellectual disabilities and the National Disability Insurance Scheme reforms. Res Practice Intell Dev Dis. 2015;2:45–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby C. Transferring responsibility: the nature and effectiveness of parental planning for the future of adults with intellectual disability who remain at home until mid-life. J Intell Dev Dis. 1996;21:295–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesel I. Mobilities of disadvantage: the housing pathways of low-income Australians. Urban Studies. 2014;51:319–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laragy C, Fisher KR, Purcal C, et al. Australia’s individualised disability funding packages: when do they provide greater choice and opportunity? Asian Soc Work Pol Rev. 2015;9:282–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percival J, Hanson J, Osipovic D. A positive outlook? The housing needs and aspirations of working age people with visual impairments. Disab Soc. 2006;21:661–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright CJ, Muenchberger H, Whitty JA. The choice agenda in the Australian supported housing context: a timely reflection. Disab Soc. 2015;30:834–848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowey L, McGlaughlin A. Assessing the barriers to achieving genuine housing choice for adults with a learning disability: the views of family carers and professionals. Br J Soc Work. 2005;35:139–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleasdale M. Supporting the housing of people with complex needs. Melbourne: AHURI; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesel I, Laragy C, Gendera S, et al. Moving to my home: housing aspirations, transitions and outcomes of people with disability. AHURI final report No. 246. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Heylen K, Van den Broeck K. Discrimination and selection in the Belgian private rental market. Housing Stud. 2016;31:223–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Productivity Commission. 2011. Disability care and support. Report no. 54. Canberra: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Bonyhady B. Tides of change: the NDIS and its journey to transform disability support. New Paradigm Austral J Psychosoc Rehabil. 2014;Summer:7–9.
   Google Scholar
• Battams S, Baum F. What policies and policy processes are needed to ensure that people with psychiatric disabilities have access to appropriate housing? Soc Sci Med. 2010;70:1026–1034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre D, Fleming J, Foster M, et al. Experiences of adults with high-care needs and their family members with housing and support pathways in Australia. Disab Rehabil. 39:1929–1839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert A, Lankshear G, Petersen A. Older family‐carers’ views on the future accommodation needs of relatives who have an intellectual disability. Int J Soc Welfare. 2008;17:54–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas J, Bigby C, Knox L, et al. Factors that underpin the delivery of effective decision-making support for people with cognitive disability. Res Pract Intell Dev Disab. 2015;2:37–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones A, Purcal C, Meltzer A, et al. Supported accommodation evaluation framework individual packages. SPRC Report 10/2015. Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre, UNSW Australia; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson S, Fisher KR, Strike R. Approaches to disability policy evaluation. Austral Soc Work. 2014;67:495–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher KR, Jones A, Lutz D. Supported accommodation evaluation framework (SAEF) guide. A guide for service providers to measure outcomes for people with disability. SPRC Report 32/14. Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre, UNSW Australia; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bigby C, Bould E, Beadle-Brown J. Conundrums of supported living: the experiences of people with intellectual disability. J Intell Dev Disab. 2017;42:309–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soldatic K, van Toorn G, Dowse L, et al. Intellectual disability and complex intersections: Marginalisation under the National Disability Insurance Scheme. Res Pract Intell Dev Disab. 2014;1:6–16.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher KR, Lutz D, Gadow F, et al. A transformative framework for deinstitutionalisation. Res Pract Intell Dev Disab. 2015;2:60–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar