Manchester–Oxford Foot Questionnaire Chinese version (MOXFQ-Ch): a validity and cross-cultural adaptation

References

• Lieberman DE, Venkadesan M, Werbel WA, et al. Foot strike patterns and collision forces in habitually barefoot versus shod runners. Nature Jan. 2010;28,463:531–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abhishek A, Roddy E, Zhang W, et al. Are hallux valgus and big toe pain associated with impaired quality of life? A cross-sectional study. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2010;18:923–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menz HB, Roddy E, Thomas E, et al. Impact of hallux valgus severity on general and foot-specific health-related quality of life. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63:396–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nix SE, Vicenzino BT, Smith MD. Foot pain and functional limitation in healthy adults with hallux valgus: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mickle KJ, Munro BJ, Lord SR, et al. ISB clinical biomechanics award 2009: toe weakness and deformity increase the risk of falls in older people. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009;24:787–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishimura A, Ito N, Nakazora S, et al. Does hallux valgus impair physical function? BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19:174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuesta-Vargas AI, Gabel CP, Bennett P. Cross cultural adaptation and validation of a Spanish version of the Lower Limb Functional Index. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson J, Coffey J, Doll H, et al. A patient-based questionnaire to assess outcomes of foot surgery: validation in the context of surgery for hallux valgus. Qual Life Res. 2006;15:1211–1222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinozzi A, Martinelli N, Panascì M, et al. Italian translation of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire, with re-assessment of reliability and validity. Qual Life Res. 2009;18:923–927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park MJ, Ko YC, Huh JW, et al. Validation of the Korean Version of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire in patients with hallux valgus. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;56:252–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcés JB, Winson I, Goldhahn S, et al. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Spanish Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) in patients with foot or ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;22:59–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbab D, Kuhlmann K, Ringendahl H, et al. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the German Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) in patients with foot or ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Surg. 2018;24:481–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesan S, Schotanus MG, Hendrickx RP. Dutch translation of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire: reassessment of reliability and validity. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;55:1199–1201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousavian A, Ebrahimzadeh MH, Birjandinejad A, et al. Translation and cultural adaptation of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) into Persian language. Foot (Edinb). 2015;25:224–227.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Talu B, Bayramlar K, Bek N, et al. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire for hallux valgus deformity evaluation. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016;50:207–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenning CD, Simons GF, Lewis MP. Ethnologue: languages of Asia, 18th Edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis MP. Ethnologue: languages of the world. 16th ed. Intl Academic Bookstore; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• UN. Nueva York. 2015 [Internet]. UNITS NATIONS [cited 2018 Aug 19]. Available from: http://www.un.org/en/sections/about-un/official-languages/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Cuesta-Vargas AI, González-Sánchez M. Spanish version of the screening Örebro musculoskeletal pain questionnaire: a cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñiz J, Elosua P, Hambleton RK, International Test Commission. [International Test Commission Guidelines for test translation and adaptation: second edition]. Psicothema 2013;25:151–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morley D, Jenkinson C, Doll H, et al. The Manchester- Oxford Foot Questionnaire(MOXFQ): development and validation of a summary index score. Bone Joint Res. 2013;2:66–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson J, Doll H, Coffey J, Oxford and Birmingham Foot and Ankle Clinical Research Group, et al. Responsiveness and minimally important change for the Manchester-Oxford foot questionnaire (MOXFQ) compared with AOFAS and SF-36 assessments following surgery for hallux valgus. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007;15:918–931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HY, Hung MC, Hu FC, et al. Estimating quality weights for EQ-5D (EuroQol-5 dimensions) health states with the time trade-off method in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2013;112:699–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Sánchez M, Ruiz-Muñoz M, Li GZ, et al. Chinese cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Foot Function Index as tool to measure patients with foot and ankle functional limitations. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40:2056–2061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam CLK, Wong CKH, Lam ETP, et al. Population norm of Chinese (HK) SF-12 health survey_version 2 of Chinese adults in Hong Kong. HK Pract. 2010;32:77–86.
   Google Scholar
• Vet HC, Ostelo RW, Terwee CB, et al. Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach. Qual Life Res. 2007;16:131–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:420–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6:1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Stratford PW. Getting more from the literature: estimating the standard error of measurement from reliability studies. Physiother Can. 2004;56:27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Costello AB, Osborne JW. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2005;10:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2005.
   Google Scholar