4,958
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Activity limitations and participation restrictions in people with multiple sclerosis: a detailed 10-year perspective

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 406-413 | Received 02 Oct 2018, Accepted 30 May 2019, Published online: 13 Jun 2019

References

  • Pugliatti M, Rosati G, Carton H, et al. The epidemiology of multiple sclerosis in Europe. Eur J Neurol. 2006;13:700–722.
  • Johansson S, Ytterberg C, Claesson IM, et al. High concurrent presence of disability in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol. 2007;254:767–773.
  • Conradsson D, Ytterberg C, von Koch L, et al. Changes in disability in people with multiple sclerosis: a 10-year prospective study. J Neurol. 2018;265:119–126.
  • Chruzander C, Johansson S, Gottberg K, et al. A 10-year follow-up of a population-based study of people with multiple sclerosis in Stockholm, Sweden: changes in disability and the value of different factors in predicting disability and mortality. J Neurol Sci. 2013;332:121–127.
  • Minden SL, Frankel D, Hadden L, et al. The Sonya Slifka Longitudinal Multiple Sclerosis Study: methods and sample characteristics. Mult Scler. 2006;12:24–38.
  • Einarsson U, Gottberg K, Fredrikson S, et al. Activities of daily living and social activities in people with multiple sclerosis in Stockholm County. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20:543–551.
  • Goverover Y, Chiaravalloti N, Gaudino-Goering E, et al. The relationship among performance of instrumental activities of daily living, self-report of quality of life, and self-awareness of functional status in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Rehabil Psychol. 2009;54:60–68.
  • Mitchell AJ, Benito-Leon J, Gonzalez JM, et al. Quality of life and its assessment in multiple sclerosis: integrating physical and psychological components of wellbeing. Lancet Neurol.2005;4:556–566.
  • Chruzander C, Tinghog P, Ytterberg C, et al. Longitudinal changes in sickness absence and disability pension, and associations between disability pension and disease-specific and contextual factors and functioning, in people with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2016;367:319–325.
  • Forslin M, Fink K, Hammar U, et al. Predictors for employment status in people with multiple sclerosis: a 10-year longitudinal observational study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99:1483–1490.
  • Gyllensten H, Wiberg M, Alexanderson K, et al. Costs of illness of multiple sclerosis in Sweden: a population-based register study of people of working age. Eur J Health Econ. 2018;19:435–446.
  • Schaffler N, Schonberg P, Stephan J, et al. Comparison of patient-reported outcome measures in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand. 2013;128:114–121.
  • Khurana V, Sharma H, Afroz N, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in multiple sclerosis: a systematic comparison of available measures. Eur J Neurol. 2017;24:1099–1107.
  • Gulick EE. Symptom and activities of daily living trajectory in multiple sclerosis: a 10-year study. Nurs Res. 1998;47:137–146.
  • Beckerman H, Kempen JC, Knol DL, et al. The first 10 years with multiple sclerosis: the longitudinal course of daily functioning. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45:68–75.
  • Solari A, Ferrari G, Radice D. A longitudinal survey of self-assessed health trends in a community cohort of people with multiple sclerosis and their significant others. J Neurol Sci. 2006;243:13–20.
  • Wynia K, van Wijlen AT, Middel B, et al. Change in disability profile and quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients: a five-year longitudinal study using the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Profile (MSIP). Mult Scler. 2012;18:654–661.
  • Poser CM, Paty DW, Scheinberg L, et al. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol. 1983;13:227–231.
  • Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology. 1983;33:1444–1452.
  • Asberg KH, Sonn U. The cumulative structure of personal and instrumental ADL. A study of elderly people in a health service district. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1989;21:171–177.
  • Brorsson B, Asberg KH. Katz index of independence in ADL. Reliability and validity in short-term care. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1984;16:125–132.
  • Ferretti-Rebustini RE, Balbinotti MA, Jacob-Filho W, et al. Validity of the Katz Index to assess activities of daily living by informants in neuropathological studies. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2015;49:946–952.
  • Reijneveld SA, Spijker J, Dijkshoorn H. Katz' ADL index assessed functional performance of Turkish, Moroccan, and Dutch elderly. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:382–388.
  • Wade DT, Legh-Smith J, Langton Hewer R. Social activities after stroke: measurement and natural history using the Frenchay Activities Index. Int Rehabil Med. 1985;7:176–181.
  • Turnbull JC, Kersten P, Habib M, et al. Validation of the Frenchay Activities Index in a general population aged 16 years and older. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:1034.
  • Kierkegaard M, Einarsson U, Gottberg K, et al. The relationship between walking, manual dexterity, cognition and activity/participation in persons with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2012;18:639–646.
  • Schepers VP, Ketelaar M, Visser-Meily JM, et al. Responsiveness of functional health status measures frequently used in stroke research. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:1035–1040.
  • Liman TG, Heuschmann PU, Endres M, et al. Impact of low mini-mental status on health outcome up to 5 years after stroke: the Erlangen Stroke Project. J Neurol. 2012;259:1125–1130.
  • Han L, Allore H, Murphy T, et al. Dynamics of functional aging based on latent-class trajectories of activities of daily living. Ann Epidemiol. 2013;23:87–92.
  • Deeg DJ. Longitudinal characterization of course types of functional limitations. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:253–261.
  • Liang J, Xu X, Bennett JM, et al. Ethnicity and changing functional health in middle and late life: a person-centered approach. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010;65:470–481.
  • Bleijenberg N, Zuithoff NPA, Smith AK, et al. Disability in the Individual ADL, IADL, and mobility among older adults: a prospective cohort study. J Nutr Health Aging. 2017;21:897–903.
  • Manouchehrinia A, Beiki O, Hillert J. Clinical course of multiple sclerosis: a nationwide cohort study. Mult Scler. 2017;23:1488–1495.
  • Leray E, Yaouanq J, Le Page E, et al. Evidence for a two-stage disability progression in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2010;133:1900–1913.
  • Brissart H, Morele E, Baumann C, et al. Cognitive impairment among different clinical courses of multiple sclerosis. Neurol Res. 2013;35:867–872.
  • Smrtka J, Brown T, Bjorklund G. Loss of mobility and the patient burden of multiple sclerosis: expert opinion on relevance to daily clinical practice. Postgrad Med. 2016;128:145–151.
  • Comi G, Radaelli M, Soelberg SP. Evolving concepts in the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2017;389:1347–1356.
  • Filippi M, Bar-Or A, Piehl F, et al. Multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2018;4:43.
  • Tomlinson CL, Patel S, Meek C, et al. Physiotherapy versus placebo or no intervention in Parkinson’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;CD002817.
  • Ploughman M. A new era of multiple sclerosis rehabilitation: lessons from stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16:768–769.
  • Pollock A, Baer G, Campbell P, et al. Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;CD001920.
  • Pearson M, Dieberg G, Smart N. Exercise as a therapy for improvement of walking ability in adults with multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:1339–1348 e7.
  • Motl RW, Sandroff BM, Kwakkel G, et al. Exercise in patients with multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16:848–856.
  • Khan F, Turner-Stokes L, Ng L, et al. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for adults with multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;CD006036.
  • Isaksson AK, Ahlstrom G, Gunnarsson LG. Quality of life and impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76:64–69.
  • Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care. 2007;45:S3–S11.
  • Hahn EA, Beaumont JL, Pilkonis PA, et al. The PROMIS satisfaction with social participation measures demonstrated responsiveness in diverse clinical populations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;73:135–141.
  • McPhail S, Lane P, Russell T, et al. Telephone reliability of the Frenchay Activity Index and EQ-5D amongst older adults. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009;7:48.
  • Yorkston KM, Kuehn CM, Johnson KL, et al. Measuring participation in people living with multiple sclerosis: a comparison of self-reported frequency, importance and self-efficacy. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:88–97.