Cross cultural adaptation, reliability and construct validity of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire in standard Arabic language

References

• Peters S, Page MJ, Coppieters MW, et al. Rehabilitation following carpal tunnel release. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(2):CD004158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ibrahim I, Khan WS, Goddard N, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome: a review of the recent literature. Open Orthop J. 2012;6:69–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shiri R, Pourmemari MH, Falah-Hassani K, et al. The effect of excess body mass on the risk of carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis of 58 studies. Obes Rev. 2015;16:1094–1104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rijn RM, Huisstede BM, Koes BW, et al. Associations between work-related factors and the carpal tunnel syndrome–a systematic review. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2009;35:19–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles J, Fahridin S, Britt H. Carpal tunnel syndrome. Aust Fam Physician. 2009;38:665.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Concannon MJ, Gainor B, Petroski GF, et al. The predictive value of electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100:1452–1458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham B, Peljovich AE, Afra R, et al. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline on: management of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98:1750–1754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ, et al. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Sur. 1993;75:1585–1592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leite J, Jerosch-Herold C, Song F. A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7:78–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atroshi I, Johnsson R, Sprinchorn A. Self-administered outcome instrument in carpal tunnel syndrome. Reliability, validity and responsiveness evaluated in 102 patients. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 1998;69:82–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bougea A, Zambelis T, Voskou P, et al. Reliability and validation of the Greek version of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. Hand (New York, NY). 2018;13:593–599.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mody GN, Anderson GA, Thomas BP, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome in Indian patients: use of modified questionnaires for assessment. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2009;34:671–678.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Upatham S, Kumnerddee W. Reliability of Thai version Boston questionnaire. J Med Assoc Thail. 2008;91:1250–1256.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Campos CC, Manzano G, de Andrade LB, et al. [Translation and validation of an instrument for evaluation of severity of symptoms and the functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2003;61:51–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oteo-Alvaro A, Marín MT, Matas JA, et al. [Spanish validation of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire]. Med Clin (Barc). 2016;146:247–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imaeda T, Uchiyama S, Toh S, et al. Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Instrument. J Orthop Sci. 2007;12:14–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186–3191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenslade JR, Mehta RL, Belward P, et al. Dash and Boston questionnaire assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome outcome: what is the responsiveness of an outcome questionnaire? J Hand Surg (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2004;29:159–164.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alotaibi NM, Aljadi SH, Alrowayeh HN. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Arabic version of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH-Arabic). Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:2469–2478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner D, Norman G. Health Measurement Scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 3rd Ed. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Sezgin M, Incel NA, Serhan S, et al. Assessment of symptom severity and functional status in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Boston Questionnaire. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:1281–1285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park DJ, Kang JH, Lee JW, et al. Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Korean Version of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire: Its Clinical Evaluation in Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Following Local Corticosteroid Injection. J Korean Med Sci. 2013;28:1095–1099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lue Y-J, Lu Y-M, Lin G-T, et al. Validation of the Chinese version of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24:139–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassankhani GG, Moradi A, Birjandinejad A, et al. Translation and validation of the Persian version the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2018;6:71–77.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trybus M, Koziej M, Belka M, et al. The Polish version of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire: associations between patient-rated outcome measures and nerve conduction studies. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019;72:924–932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:S15–S20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins WG. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med. 2000;30:1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15:155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen RD, Jylli L, Ambuel B. Cultural adaptation of patient and observational outcome measures: a methodological example using the COMFORT behavioral rating scale [Article]. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014;51:934–942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar