1,321
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Steering towards collaborative assessment: a qualitative study of parents’ experiences of evidence-based assessment practices for their child with cerebral palsy

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 458-467 | Received 31 Jan 2019, Accepted 05 Jun 2019, Published online: 23 Jun 2019

References

  • Wu YW, Mehravari AS, Numis AL. Cerebral palsy research funding from the national institutes of health, 2001 to 2013. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015;57:936–941.
  • Schiariti V, Fowler E, Brandenburg JE, et al. A common data language for clinical research studies: the national institute of neurological disorders and stroke and American academy for cerebral palsy and developmental medicine cerebral palsy common data elements version 1.0 recommendations. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018;60:976–986.
  • Wright FV, Majnemer A. The concept of a toolbox of outcome measures for children with cerebral palsy: why, what, and how to use? J Child Neurol. 2014;29:1055–1065.
  • Bartlett DJ, McCoy SW, Chiarello LA, et al. A collaborative approach to decision making through developmental monitoring to provide individualized services for children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther. 2018;98:865–875.
  • Palisano RJ. A collaborative model of service delivery for children with movement disorders: a framework for evidence-based decision making. Phys Ther. 2006;86:1295–1305.
  • Ketelaar M, Russell DJ, Gorter JW. The challenge of moving evidence-based measures into clinical practice: lessons in knowledge translation. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2008;28:191–206.
  • Unsworth CA. Evidence-based practice depends on the routine use of outcome measures. Br J Occup Ther. 2011;74:209–209.
  • King G, Chiarello L. Family-centered care for children with cerebral palsy: conceptual and practical considerations to advance care and practice. J Child Neurol. 2014;29:1046–1054.
  • Kuo DZ, Houtrow AJ, Arango P, et al. Family-centered care: current applications and future directions in pediatric health care. Matern Child Health J. 2012;16:297–305.
  • Dunst CJ, Trivette CM. Meta-analytic structural equation modeling of the influences of family-centered care on parent and child psychological health. Int J Pediatr. 2009;2009:576840.
  • Järvikoski A, Härkäpää K, Martin M, et al. Service characteristics as predictors of parents’ perceptions of child rehabilitation outcomes. J Child Health Care. 2015;19:106–117.
  • Kruijsen-Terpstra AJ, Verschuren O, Ketelaar M, et al. Parents’ experiences and needs regarding physical and occupational therapy for their young children with cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil. 2016;53:314–322.
  • Jackson C, Cheater FM, Reid I. A systematic review of decision support needs of parents making child health decisions. Health Expect. 2008;11:232–251.
  • Resch JA, Mireles G, Benz MR, et al. Giving parents a voice: a qualitative study of the challenges experienced by parents of children with disabilities. Rehabil Psychol. 2010;55:139.
  • Dempsey I, Keen D, Pennell D, et al. Parent stress, parenting competence and family-centered support to young children with an intellectual or developmental disability. Res Dev Disabil. 2009;30:558–566.
  • An M, Palisano RJ, Yi C-h, et al. Effects of a collaborative intervention process on parent–therapist interaction: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2019;39:259–275.
  • O'Connor B, Kerr C, Shields N, et al. A systematic review of evidence-based assessment practices by allied health practitioners for children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016;58:332–347.
  • Bailes AF, Gannotti M, Bellows DM, et al. Caregiver knowledge and preferences for gross motor function information in cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018;60:1264–1270.
  • Colquhoun H, Lamontagne ME, Duncan EA, et al. A systematic review of interventions to increase the use of standardized outcome measures by rehabilitation professionals. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31:299–309.
  • Krohne K, T S, Slettebø Å, et al. Individualizing standardized tests: physiotherapists’ and occupational therapists’ test practices in a geriatric setting. Qual Health Res. 2013;23:1168–1178.
  • Reeder J, Morris J. The importance of the therapeutic relationship when providing information to parents of children with long-term disabilities: the views and experiences of uk paediatric therapists. J Child Health Care. 2018;22:371–381.
  • King G, Wright V, Russell DJ. Understanding paediatric rehabilitation therapists' lack of use of outcome measures. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:2662–2671.
  • O’Connor B, Kerr C, Shields N, et al. Understanding allied health practitioners’ use of evidence-based assessments for children with cerebral palsy: a mixed methods study. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41:53–65.
  • Öhrvall A, Eliasson AC. Parents' and therapists' perceptions of the content of the manual ability classification system, macs. Scand J Occup Ther. 2010;17:209–216.
  • Kerr C, Imms C, Foley S, et al. Parent perceptions of routine clinical assessment for children with cerebral palsy. Physiotherapy. 2016;102:e243.
  • Øien I, Fallang B, Østensjø S. Goal-setting in paediatric rehabilitation: perceptions of parents and professional. Child Care Health Dev. 2010;36:558–565.
  • Gibson BE, Mistry B, Wright FV. Development of child and family-centered engagement guidelines for clinical administration of the challenge to measure advanced gross motor skills: a qualitative study. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2018;38:417–426.
  • Rich D, Rigby P, Wright V. Mothers' experiences with the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory (pedi). Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2014;34:271–288.
  • Scime NV, Bartlett DJ, Brunton LK, et al. Parents’ experiences and perceptions when classifying their children with cerebral palsy: Recommendations for service providers. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2017;37:252–267.
  • Thorne SE. Interpretive description. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press; 2008.
  • Crotty M. The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. St Leonards, Australia: Allen & Unwin; 1998.
  • Palisano RR, Walter S, Russell D, et al. Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997;39:214–223.
  • Liamputtong P. Qualitative research methods. 4th ed. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2013.
  • Hennink MM, Kaiser BN, Marconi VC. Code saturation versus meaning saturation: How many interviews are enough? Qual Health Res. 2017;27:591–608.
  • Pryse GS. Mothers _Vote labour. [artwork]. Manchester (UK): Courtesy of People’s History Museum.
  • Dunst CJ, Trivette CM. Capacity-building family-systems intervention practices. J Fam Soc Work. 2009;12:119–143.
  • Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84:191–215.
  • Jones TL, Prinz RJ. Potential roles of parental self-efficacy in parent and child adjustment: a review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2005;25:341–363.
  • Trivette CM, Dunst CJ, Hamby DW. Influences of family- systems intervention practices on parent-child interactions and child development. Top Early Child Special Educ. 2010;30:3–19.
  • Bjorbækmo WS, Engelsrud GH. Experiences of being tested: a critical discussion of the knowledge involved and produced in the practice of testing in children's rehabilitation. Med Health Care and Philos. 2011;14:123–131.
  • Olshansky S. Chronic sorrow: a response to having a mentally defective child. Soc Casework. 1962;43:190–193.
  • Phillips M. Chronic sorrow in mothers of chronically ill and disabled children. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs. 1991;14:111–120.
  • Hobdell E. Chronic sorrow and depression in parents of children with neural tube defects. J Neurosci Nurs. 2004;36:82–88,94.
  • Knox M. Family control: the views of families who have a child with an intellectual disability. J Appl Res Int Dis. 2000;13:17–28.
  • Svendby R, R GI, Moen K. The language of percentages: ranking bodies, shaping realities, and limiting opportunities. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;41:382–388.
  • Hunt MR. Strengths and challenges in the use of interpretive description: reflections arising from a study of the moral experience of health professionals in humanitarian work. Qual Health Res. 2009;19:1284–1292.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.