Duke Activity Status Index cut-off scores for assessing functional capacity after stroke

References

• Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2018 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;137:e67–e492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Küçükdeveci AA, Sunnerhagen KS, Golyk V, et al. Evidence based position paper on Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (PRM) professional practice for persons with stroke. The European PRM position (UEMS PRM Section). Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;54:957–970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria-Fortini I, Basílio ML, Polese JC, et al. Social participation of individuals with chronic stroke. Rev Ter Ocup Univ São Paulo. 2017;28:71–78.
   Google Scholar
• Arena R, Myers J, Williams MA, et al. American Heart Association Committee on Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Prevention of the Council on Clinical Cardiology. American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Nursing: assessment of functional capacity in clinical and research settings: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Prevention of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. Circulation. 2007;116:329–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith AC, Saunders DH, Mead G. Cardiorespiratory fitness after stroke: a systematic review. Int J Stroke. 2012;7:499–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whaley MH, Brubaker PH, Otto RM, Health related fitness testing and interpretation. In: Whaley MH, Brubaker PH, Otto RM, et al., editors. ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 7th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p. 55–92.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton A, Fritz SL, Lusardi M. Walking speed: the functional vital sign. J Aging Phys Act. 2015;23:314–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hlatky MA, Boineau RE, Higginbotham MB, et al. A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (the Duke Activity Status Index). Am J Cardiol. 1989;64:651–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutinho-Myrrha MA, Dias RC, Fernandes AA, et al. Duke activity status index for cardiovascular diseases: validation of the Portuguese translation. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014;102:383–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter R, Holiday DB, Grothues C, et al. Criterion validity of the Duke Activity Status Index for assessing functional capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2002;22:298–308.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polese JC, Sérvio TC, Chaves GSS, et al. Relationships between self-reported and performance-based measures of functional capacity in individuals with chronic stroke. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28:1208–1212.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shaw LJ, Olson MB, Kip K, et al. The value of estimated functional capacity in estimating outcome: results from the NHBLI-Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:S36–S43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips L, Wang JW, Pfeffer B, et al. Clinical role of the Duke Activity Status Index in the selection of the optimal type of stress myocardial perfusion imaging study in patients with known or suspected ischemic heart disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2011;18:1015–1020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers J, Zaheer N, Quaglietti S, et al. Association of functional and health status measures in heart failure. J Card Fail. 2006;12:439–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Zhang B, Deng D, et al. The relationship between functional capacity (FC) and cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) in senile patients after noncardiac surgery. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2010;51:92–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scotto CJ, Waechter DJ, Rosneck J. Adherence to prescribed exercise and diet regimens two months post-cardiac rehabilitation. Can J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2011;21:11–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gary RA, Cress ME, Higgins MK, et al. Combined aerobic and resistance exercise program improves task performance in patients with heart failure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:1371–1381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mieres JH, Heller GV, Hendel RC, et al. Signs and symptoms of suspected myocardial ischemia in women: results from the What is the Optimal Method for Ischemia Evaluation in WomeN? Trial. J Womens Health. 2011;20:1261–1268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolucci PHF, Brucki SMD, Campacci SR, et al. The Mini-Mental State Examination in a general population impact of schooling. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 1994;52:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan X, Lee KS, Frazier SK, et al. Psychometric testing of the Duke Activity Status Index in patients with heart failure. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2015;14:214–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavares LdA, Barreto Neto J, Jardim JR, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and assessment of reproducibility of the Duke Activity Status Index for COPD patients in Brazil. J Bras Pneumol. 2012;38:684–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nascimento LR, Caetano LC, Freitas DC, et al. Different instructions during the ten-meter walking test determined significant increases in maximum gait speed in individuals with chronic hemiparesis. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2012;16:122–127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salbach NM, Mayo NF, Higgins J, et al. Responsiveness and predictability of gait speed and other disability measures in acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:1204–1212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden MG, Balasubramanian CK, Behrman AL, et al. Validation of a speed-based classification system using quantitative measures of walking performance post-stroke mark G. Neurorehab Neural Re. 2008;22:72–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:M146–M156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 2nd ed. Hoboken, (NJ): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Muren MA, Hütler M, Hooper J. Functional capacity and health-related quality of life in individuals post stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008;15:51–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanishi K, Green J, Taguri M, et al. Determining a cut-off point for scores of the breastfeeding self-efficacy scale-short form: secondary data analysis of an intervention study in Japan. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0129698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxim LD, Niebo R, Utell MJ. Screening tests: a review with examples. Inhal Toxicol. 2014;26:811–828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevethan R. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values: foundations, pliabilities, and pitfalls in research practice. Front Public Health. 2017;5:307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria-Fortini I, Basílio ML, Scianni AA, et al. Performance and capacity-based measures of locomotion, compared to impairment-based measures, best predicted participation in individuals with hemiparesis due to stroke. Disabil Reabil. 2018;40:1791–1798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ada L, Dean CM, Lindley R, et al. Improving community ambulation after stroke: the AMBULATE Trial. BMC Neurol. 2009;9:8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohannon RW, Andrews AW, Smith MB. Rehabilitation goals of patients with hemiplegia. Int J Rehabil Res. 1988;11:181–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord SE, McPherson K, McNaughton HK, et al. Community ambulation after stroke: how important and obtainable is it and what measures appear predictive? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:234–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord SE, Rochester L. Measurement of community ambulation after stroke: current status and future developments. Stroke. 2005;36:1457–1461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar