The Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale: translation and cross-cultural validation into Greek

References

• Frank A. Vocational rehabilitation: supporting Ill or disabled individuals in (to) work: a UK perspective. Healthcare. 2016;4(0 ):1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Galli G, Lenggenhager B, Scivoletto G, et al. Don't look at my wheelchair! The plasticity of longlasting prejudice. Med Educ. 2015;49:1239–1247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimmer JH, Rowland JL. Health promotion for people with disabilities: implications for empowering the person and promoting disability-friendly environments. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2008;2:409–420.
   Google Scholar
• Murtagh MJ, Burges Watson DL, Jenkings KN, et al. Situationally-sensitive knowledge translation and relational decision making in hyperacute stroke: a qualitative study. PLoS One. 2012;7:e37066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gething L, Wheeler B. The Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale: a new Australian instrument to measure attitudes towards people with disabilities. Aus J Physiother. 1992;44:75–82.
   Google Scholar
• Gething L. Attitudes toward people with disabilities of physiotherapists and members of the general population. Aust J Physiother. 1993;39:291–296.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sarafis P, Rousaki E, Tsounis A, et al. The impact of occupational stress on nurses’ caring behaviors and their health related quality of life. BMC Nurs. 2016;15:56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller R, Peter C, Cieza A, et al. The role of social support and social skills in people with spinal cord injury – a systematic review of the literature. Spinal Cord. 2012;50:94–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields N, Taylor N. Contact with young adults with disability led to a positive change in attitudes toward disability among physiotherapy students. Physiother Can. 2014;66:298–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papastavrou ε, Efstathiou G, Tsangari H, et al. A cross-cultural study of the concept of caring through behaviours: patients’ and nurses’ perspectives in six different EU countries. J Adv Nurs. 2012;68:1026–1037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papastavrou E, Efstathiou G, Tsangari H, et al. Patients’ and nurses’ perceptions of respect and human presence through caring behaviours: a comparative study. Nurs Ethics. 2012;19:369–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kritsotakis G, Galanis P, Papastefanakis E, et al. Attitudes towards people with physical or intellectual disabilities among nursing, social work and medical students. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26:4951–4953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gething L. Nurse practitioners' and students' attitudes towards people with disabilities. Aust J Adv Nurs. 1992;9:25–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wallymahmed A, McKay-Moffat S, Cunningham C. The Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale: a validation with UK midwifes. Soc Behav Pers. 2007;35:1049–1060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas A, Palmer JK, Coker-Juneau C, et al. Factor structure and construct validity of the Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale. Educ Psychol Meas. 2003;63:465–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa V, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17:268–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney L, Watkins M. Foundations of clinical research. Applications to practice. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson Education; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Papastavrou E, Karlou C, Tsangari H, et al. Cross-cultural validation and psychometric properties of the Greek version of the Caring Behaviors Inventory: a methodological study. J Eval Clin Practice. 2011;17:435–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Larrabee J, Putman H. Caring Behaviors Inventory: a reduction of the 42-item instrument. Nurs Res. 2006;55:18–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G* Power analysis [Internet]. [cited 2019 Jul 18]. Available from: http://www.gpower.hhu.de/
   Google Scholar
• Lampropoulou S, Gizeli α, Kalivioti C, et al. Cross cultural adaptation of Berg Balance scale in Greek for various balance impairments. HSOA J Phys Med Rehabil Disabil. 2016;2:1-13.
   Google Scholar
• Mac Callum R, Widamam K. Sample size in factor analysis. Psychol Methods. 1999;4:84–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Winter JC, Dodou D, Wieringa PA. Exploratory factor analysis with small sample sizes. Multivariate Behav Res. 2009;44:147–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gething L. IDP Scale manual obtained by the University of Sydney (Sydney Nursing School).
   Google Scholar
• Gething L. The Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale. J Soc Behav & Personal. 1994;9:23–42.
   Google Scholar
• MacLean D, Gannon PM. Measuring attitudes towards disability: the Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale. Revisited. J Soc Behav & Personal. 1995;10:791–806.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshida MW, Sonoda T, Zemke R. Validation of Urdu Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale. Int J Rehabil Res. 2003; 26:229–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forlin C, Fogarty G, Caroll A. Validation of the factor structure of the Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale. Aus J Psychol. 1999;51:5–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stachura K, Garven F. Comparison of occupational therapy and physiotherapy students’ attitudes towards people with disabilities. Physiotherapy. 2003;89:653–664.
   Google Scholar
• Stachura K, Garven F. A national survey of occupational therapy students’ and physiotherapy students’ attitudes to disabled people. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21:442–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar