Self-reported feedback in ICT-delivered aphasia rehabilitation: a literature review

References

• Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, Krishnamurthi R, et al. Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990-2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2014;383:245–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowers HL, Silver FL, Fang J, et al. The incidence, co-occurrence, and predictors of dysphagia, dysarthria, and aphasia after first-ever acute ischemic stroke. J Commun Disord. 2013;46:238–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham JR, Pereira S, Teasell R. Aphasia and return to work in younger stroke survivors. Aphasiology. 2011;25:952–960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady MC, Kelly H, Godwin J, et al. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(6):CD000425.
   Google Scholar
• Code C, Petheram B. Delivering for aphasia. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011;13:3–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng C, Lynch L, Taylor N. Effect of computer therapy in aphasia: a systematic review. Aphasiology. 2016;30:211–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menger F, Morris J, Salis C. Aphasia in an Internet age: wider perspectives on digital inclusion. Aphasiology. 2016;30:112–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffatt K, McGrenere J, Purves B, et al. editors. The participatory design of a sound and image enhanced daily planner for people with Aphasia. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2004); 2004. Vienna, Austria. 985744: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmud AA, Rvd V, Slats L, et al. MEA: designing a multimodal email support tool for persons with Aphasia. CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems; Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 2581228: ACM; 2014. p. 1219–1224.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson S, Roper A, Marshall J, et al. Codesign for people with aphasia through tangible design languages. CoDesign. 2015;11:21–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugliese M, Ramsay T, Johnson D, et al. Mobile tablet-based therapies following stroke: A systematic scoping review of administrative methods and patient experiences. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0191566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen J. Usability Engineering. San Franciso: Morgan Kaufmann; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. Ergonomics of human-system interaction — Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts ISO 9241-11:2018(en): International Organization for Standardization; 2018 [cited 2018 Nov 08]. Available from: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-11:ed-2:v1:en
   Google Scholar
• Mortley J, Wade J, Enderby P. Superhighway to promoting a client-therapist partnership? Using the Internet to deliver word-retrieval computer therapy, monitored remotely with minimal speech and language therapy input. Aphasiology. 2004;18:193–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Thong JY, Xu X. Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. JAIS. 2016;17:328–376.
   Google Scholar
• Liu L, Miguel Cruz A, Rios Rincon A, et al. What factors determine therapists' acceptance of new technologies for rehabilitation - a study using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:447–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranen K, Drossaert CHC, Brinkman ES, et al. An exploration of chronic pain patients’ perceptions of home telerehabilitation services. Health Expect. 2012;15:339–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, et al. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly. 2003;27:425–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomkins B, Siyambalapitiya S, Worrall L. What do people with aphasia think about their health care? Factors influencing satisfaction and dissatisfaction. Aphasiology. 2013;27:972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009;26:91–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pluddemann A, Aronson JK, Onakpoya I, et al. Redefining rapid reviews: a flexible framework for restricted systematic reviews. BMJ EBM. 2018;23:201–203.
   Google Scholar
• Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs. 2005;52:546–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pace R, Pluye P, Bartlett G, et al. Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49:47–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer R, Enderby P, Paterson G. Using computers to enable self-management of aphasia therapy exercises for word finding: the patient and carer perspective. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013;48:508–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caute A, Cruice M, Friede A, et al. Rekindling the love of books – a pilot project exploring whether e-readers help people to read again after a stroke. Aphasiology. 2016;30:290–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney LR, Halper AS, Holland AL, et al. Computerized script training for aphasia: Preliminary results. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008;17:19–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Routhier S, Bier N, Macoir J. Smart tablet for smart self-administered treatment of verb anomia: two single-case studies in aphasia. Aphasiology. 2016;30:269–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albright E, Purves B. Exploring SentenceShaper™: Treatment and augmentative possibilities. Aphasiology. 2008;22:741–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce C, Edmundson A, Coleman M. Writing with voice: an investigation of the use of a voice recognition system as a writing aid for a man with aphasia. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2003;38:131–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall J, Devane N, Edmonds L, et al. Delivering word retrieval therapies for people with aphasia in a virtual communication environment. Aphasiology. 2018;32:1054–1074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall J, Roper A, Galliers J, et al. Computer delivery of gesture therapy for people with severe aphasia. Aphasiology. 2013;27:1128–1146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenke R, Lawrie M, Hobson T, et al. Feasibility and cost analysis of implementing high intensity aphasia clinics within a sub-acute setting. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014;16:250–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi Y-H, Park HK, Paik N-J. A telerehabilitation approach for chronic aphasia following stroke. Telemed J E Health. 2016;22:434–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallet KH, Shamloul RM, Corbett D, et al. Recovernow: Feasibility of a mobile tablet-based rehabilitation intervention to treat post-stroke communication deficits in the acute care setting. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0167950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill AJ, Breslin HM. Refining an Asynchronous Telerehabilitation Platform for Speech-Language Pathology: Engaging End-Users in the Process [Original Research]. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10:640–640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney LR, Halper AS, Kaye RC. Computer-based script training for aphasia: emerging themes from post-treatment interviews. J Commun Disord. 2011;44:493–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade J, Mortley J, Enderby P. Talk about IT: Views of people with aphasia and their partners on receiving remotely monitored computer‐based word finding therapy. Aphasiology. 2003;17:1031–1056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandenburg C, Worrall L, Copland D, et al. Barriers and facilitators to using the CommFit™ smart phone app to measure talk time for people with aphasia. Aphasiology. 2017;31:901–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galliers J, Wilson S, Marshall J, et al. Experiencing EVA Park, a Multi-User Virtual World for People with Aphasia. ACM Trans Access Comput. 2017;10:1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaya A, Woolf C, Devane N, et al. Receiving aphasia intervention in a virtual environment: the participants’ perspective. Aphasiology. 2018;32:538–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall J, Booth T, Devane N, et al. Evaluating the benefits of aphasia intervention delivered in virtual reality: results of a quasi-randomised study. PLOS ONE. 2016;11:e0160381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinburn K, Porter G, Howard D. Comprehensive aphasia test. Hove (UK): Psychology Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Wiederholt JL, Bryant BR. Gray oral reading tests. Pro-ed; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Cocks N, Pritchard M, Cornish H, et al. A “novel” reading therapy programme for reading difficulties after a subarachnoid haemorrhage. Aphasiology. 2013;27:509–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugliese M, Ramsay T, Shamloul R, et al. RecoverNow: A mobile tablet-based therapy platform for early stroke rehabilitation. PLOS ONE. 2019;14:e0210725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallet K, Shamloul R, Pugliese M, et al. RecoverNow: A patient perspective on the delivery of mobile tablet-based stroke rehabilitation in the acute care setting. Int J Stroke. 2019;14:174–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly H, Kennedy F, Britton H, et al. Narrowing the “digital divide”—facilitating access to computer technology to enhance the lives of those with aphasia: a feasibility study. Aphasiology. 2015;30:133–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar