Stroke Communication Scale based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF - SCS)

References

• Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014;128:1–267.
   Google Scholar
• Hand C. Associations between neighbourhood characteristics and community mobility in older adults with chronic health conditions. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(17):1664–1671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira AIC, Silveira K. Utilização da CIF em pacientes com sequelas de. AVC. Rev Neurocienc. 2011;19:653–662.
   Google Scholar
• Kemper S, McDowd J, Pohl P, et al. Revealing language deficits following stroke: the cost of doing two things at once. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2006;13(1):115–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucena EMF, Moraes JD, Batista HRL, et al. The functionality of patients afflicted with EVA according to their access to rehabilitation. Acta Fisiatr. 2011;18:112–118.
   Google Scholar
• John A, Enderby P. Reliability of speech and language therapists using therapy outcome measures. Int J Lang Commun Disord.. 2000;35:287–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. World Health Organization. World report on disability. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes J, Orange JB. Mapping functional communication measurements for traumatic brain injury to the WHO-ICF. CJSLPA. 2007;21:134–143.
   Google Scholar
• Cruice M. The contribution and impact of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health on quality of life in communication disorders. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008;10(1–2):38–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goliar N, Burger H, Vidmar G, et al. Functioning and Rehabilitation in stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32:S50–S58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilari K, Lamping DL, Smith S, et al. Psychometric properties of the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Sale (SAQOL-39) in a generic stroke population. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23(6):544–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie N, Kagan A, Victor JC, et al. The assessment for living with aphasia: reliability and construct validity. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014;16(1):82–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan A, Simmons-Mackie N, Rowland A, et al. Counting what counts: a framework for capturing real-life outcomes of aphasia intervention. Aphasiology. 2008;22(3):258–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilari K, Byng S, Lamping DL, et al. Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 (SAQOL): evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity. Stroke. 2003;34(8):1944–1950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry A, Morris M, Unsworth C, et al. Therapy outcome measures for allied health practitioners in Australia: the AusTOMs. Int J Qual Health Care. 2004;16(4):285–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagliarin KC, Ortiz KZ, Parente MA, et al. Montreal-Toulouse language assessment battery for aphasia: validity and reliability evidence. NeuroRehabil. 2014;34:463–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca RP, Parent M, Côté H, et al. Introducing a communication assessment tool to Brazilian speech therapists: The MAC Battery. Pró-Fono R Atual Cient. 2008;20(4):285–291.
   Google Scholar
• LoBiondo-Wood G, Haber J. Pesquisa em Enfermafem: métodos, avaliação crítica e utilização. Rio De Janeiro: Guanabara-Koogan; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Minayo MCS. Pesquisa social: teoria, método e criatividade. Petropolis: Editora Vozes; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Santana MTC, Chun R. Language and functionality on post-stroke: evaluation based on International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Codas. 2017;29(1):e20150284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pommerehn J, Delboni MC, Fedosse E. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, and aphasia: a study of social participation. Codas. 2016;28(2):132–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie N, Kagan A. Application of the ICF in aphasia. Semin Speech Lang. 2007;28(4):244–253.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Howe TJ. The ICF contextual factors related to speech-language pathology. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008;10(1–2):27–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matos MAC, Jesus LMT, Cruice M. Consequences of stroke and aphasia according to the ICF domains: views of Portuguese people with aphasia, family members and professionals. Aphasiology. 2014;28(7):771–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riberto M, Lopes KAT, Chiappetta LM, et al. The use of the comprehensive International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health core set for stroke for chronic outpatients in three Brazilian rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(5):367–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins EF, de Sousa PHC, Barbosa PDA, et al. A Brazilian experience to describe functioning and disability profiles provided by combined use of ICD and ICF in chronic stroke patients at home-care. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(21–22):2064–2074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schepers VPM, Ketelaar M, van de Port IG, et al. Comparing contents of functional outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(3):221–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worrall L, Sherratt S, Rogers P, et al. What people with aphasia want: their goals according to the ICF. Aphasiology. 2011;25(3):309–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar