Rehabilitation professionals’ views on social media use in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: gatekeepers to participation

References

• Douglas J. The things that help, the things that get in the way: working together to improve outcome following acquired brain injury. Brain Impair. 2018;19(3):258–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Togher L, Wiseman-Hakes C, Douglas J, et al. INCOG recommendations for management of cognition following traumatic brain injury. IV. Cognitive communication. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014;29(4):353–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner M, Palmer S, Togher L, et al. ‘I kind of figured it out’: the views and experiences of people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) in using social media – self-determination for participation and inclusion online. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019;54(2):221–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson W, Griswold D. Traumatic brain injury: a global challenge. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(12):949–950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbourn E, Togher L, Kenny B, et al. Strengthening the quality of longitudinal research into cognitive-communication recovery after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017;19(1):1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas J. “So that's the way it is for me – always being left out.” Acquired pragmatic language impairment and social functioning following traumatic brain injury. Brain Impair. 2017;18(3):321–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell W, Smith A. Post-traumatic amnesia in closed head injury. Arch Neurol. 1961;5(1):4–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacDonald S. Introducing the model of cognitive-communication competence: a model to guide evidence-based communication interventions after brain injury. Brain Inj. 2017;31(13–14):1760–1780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schellinger S. Public Perceptions of Traumatic Brain Injury: Knowledge, Attitudes, and the Impact of Education [dissertation]. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Brunner M, Hemsley B, Palmer S, et al. Review of the literature on the use of social media by people with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(17):1511–1521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner M, Hemsley B, Dann S, et al. Hashtag #TBI: a content and network data analysis of tweets about traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2018;32(1):49–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner M, Palmer S, Togher L, et al. Content analysis of tweets by people with traumatic brain injury (TBI): implications for rehabilitation and social media goals. Social Media and Healthcare Technology. Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2019 (HICSS-52); Maui, Hawaii; 2019. p. 4329–4338.
   Google Scholar
• Brunner M, Palmer S, Togher L, et al. “If I knew what I was doing on Twitter then I would use it more”: Twitter experiences and networks of people with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Brain Impair. 2019. DOI:10.1017/BrImp.2019.12
   Google Scholar
• Brunner M, Hemsley B, Togher T, et al. Supporting people to use social media after traumatic brain injury (TBI). 2019. (manuscript in preparation).
   Google Scholar
• Brunner M, Hemsley B, Togher L, et al. Technology and its role in rehabilitation for people with cognitive-communication disability following a traumatic brain injury (TBI). Brain Inj. 2017;31(8):1028–1043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemsley B, Palmer S, Dann S, et al. Using Twitter to access the human right of communication for people who use Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC). Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018;20(1):50–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace E, Raghavendra P, Newman L, et al. Learning to use the Internet and online social media: what is the effectiveness of home-based intervention for youth with complex communication needs? Child Lang Teach Ther. 2014;30(2):141–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman L, Browne-Yung K, Raghavendra P, et al. Applying a critical approach to investigate barriers to digital inclusion and online social networking among young people with disabilities. Info Syst J. 2017;27(5):559–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavendra P, Grace E, Wood D, et al., editors. Enhancing social participation in young people with disabilities: evidence based strategies for supporting access to online social networking. London: EACD; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Baier C, Hoepner J, Sather T. Exploring Snapchat as a dynamic capture tool for social networking in persons with aphasia. Aphasiology. 2018;32(11):1336–1359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker-Sparr C, Hart T, Bergquist T, et al. Internet and social media use after traumatic brain injury: a Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems study. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2018;33(1):E9–E17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Feeney T. Reflections on dobermanns, poodles, and social rehabilitation for difficult-to-serve individuals with traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology. 2000;14(4):407–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell J. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4th ed. London: Sage; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger J. The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociol Health Illness. 1994;16(1):103–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton M. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Ashby G, Griffin C, Agrawal N. Brain injury and deprivation of liberty on neurosciences wards: a gilded cage is still a cage. Pract Neurol. 2015;15(5):361–368.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Humpage L. Models of disability, work and welfare in Australia. Social Policy Admin. 2007;41(3):215–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haegele J, Hodge S. Disability discourse: overview and critiques of the medical and social models. Quest. 2016;68(2):193–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright F, Boland P, Rutherford S, et al. Implementing a client-centred approach in rehabilitation: an autoethnography. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(12):997–1004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox L, Douglas J, Bigby C. Whose decision is it anyway? How clinicians support decision-making participation after acquired brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(22):1926–1932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson L. Sport-related neurotrauma and neuroprotection: are return-to-play protocols justified by paternalism? Neuroethics. 2015;8(1):15–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripley D, Russell M, Bergquist T, et al. Paternalism, privacy, and participation: cell phones on the brain injury rehabilitation unit. J Inj Funct Rehabil. 2019;11(1):76–82.
   Google Scholar
• Wong D, Sinclair K, Seabrook E, et al. Smartphones as assistive technology following traumatic brain injury: a preliminary study of what helps and what hinders. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(23):2387–2394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemsley B, Balandin S, Palmer S, et al. A call for innovative social media research in the field of augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun. 2017;33(1):14–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery B. Building and sustaining diverse functioning networks using social media and digital platforms to improve diversity and inclusivity. Front Digit Humanit. 2018;5:22.
   Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Feeney T. Reconstruction of identity after brain injury. Brain Impair. 2000;1(1):12–28.
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn E, Durocher E, Feldman D, et al. Supporting, promoting, respecting and advocating: a scoping study of rehabilitation professionals’ responses to patient autonomy. Can J Bioethics/Rev Can Bioéthique. 2018;1(3):22–34.
   Google Scholar
• Siegert R, Taylor W. Theoretical aspects of goal-setting and motivation in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(1):1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M. Self-coaching: a context-sensitive, person-centred approach to social communication after traumatic brain injury. Brain Impair. 2006;7(3):246–258.
   Google Scholar
• Cassel A, McDonald S, Kelly M, et al. Learning from the minds of others: a review of social cognition treatments and their relevance to traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2019;29(1):22–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross P, Di Stefano M, Charlton J, et al. Interventions for resuming driving after traumatic brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(7):757–764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolwyk R, Charlton J, Ross P, et al. Characterizing on-road driving performance in individuals with traumatic brain injury who pass or fail an on-road driving assessment. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(11):1313–1320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laxe S, Zasler N, Selb M, et al. Development of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health core sets for traumatic brain injury: an international consensus process. Brain Inj. 2013;27(4):379–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham I, Logan J, Harrison M, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Cont Educ Health Prof. 2006;26(1):13–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, et al. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. BMJ Qual Saf. 2005;14(1):26–33.
   Google Scholar