Strategies used to engage hard-to-reach populations in childhood disability research: a scoping review

References

• CIHR. Canada’s strategy for patient-oriented research: improving health outcomes through evidence-informed care. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Institutes of Health Research; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• CIHR. Strategy for patient-oriented research: patient engagement framework. 2014. Available from: http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/documents/spor_framework-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Selker HP, Leslie LK, Wasser JS, et al. Tufts CTSI: comparative effectiveness research as a conceptual framework for a focus on impact. Clin Transl Sci. 2010;3(2):56–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, et al. A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities. Patient. 2014;7(4):387–395.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonevski B, Randell M, Paul C, et al. Reaching the hard-to-reach: a systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14(1):42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Camden C, Shikako-Thomas K, Nguyen T, et al. Engaging stakeholders in rehabilitation research: a scoping review of strategies used in partnerships and evaluation of impacts. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(15):1390–1400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Concannon TW, Fuster M, Saunders T, et al. A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(12):1692–1701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey S, Boddy K, Briscoe S, et al. Involving disabled children and young people as partners in research: a systematic review. Child Care Health Dev. 2015;41(4):505–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter B, Towers C. Recognising fathers: the needs of fathers of children with disabilities. Support Learn. 2008;23(3):118–125.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill T. Fathers of children with a chronic health condition: beyond gender stereotypes. Men Masculinities. 2007;9(4):409–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lollar DJ, Andresen EM, editors. Public health perspectives on disability: epidemiology to ethics and beyond. New York: Springer; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med. 2012;22(3):276–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters MDJ, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, et al. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):141–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu AP, Pearse JE, Baggaley J, et al. Participatory design in the development of an early therapy intervention for perinatal stroke. BMC Pediatr. 2017;17(1):33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlsson T, Marttala UM, Wadensten B, et al. Involvement of persons with lived experience of a prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defect: an explorative study to gain insights into perspectives on future research. Res Involv Engagem. 2016;2(1):35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fox F, Aabe N, Turner K, et al. “It was like walking without knowing where I was going”: a qualitative study of autism in a UK Somali migrant community. J Autism Dev Disord. 2017;47(2):305–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard L, Mackey S, Davidson PM. Functional clinical placements: a driver for change. Nurse Educ Today. 2010;30(5):398–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selman LE, Fox F, Aabe N, et al. ‘You are labelled by your children’s disability’ – a community-based, participatory study of stigma among Somali parents of children with autism living in the United Kingdom. Ethn Health. 2018;23(7):781–796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaz I. Visual symbols in healthcare settings for children with learning disabilities and autism spectrum disorder. Br J Nurs. 2013;22(3):156–159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Young H, Fenwick M, Lambe L, et al. Multi‐sensory storytelling as an aid to assisting people with profound intellectual disabilities to cope with sensitive issues: a multiple research methods analysis of engagement and outcomes. Eur J Spec Needs Educ. 2011;26(2):127–142.
   Google Scholar
• Zamora I, Williams ME, Higareda M, et al. Brief report: recruitment and retention of minority children for autism research. J Autism Dev Disord. 2016;46(2):698–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danker J, Strnadová I, Cumming TM. Engaging students with autism spectrum disorder in research through participant-driven photo-elicitation research technique. Australas J Spec Educ. 2017;41(1):35–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha VS, Whittaker A. ‘Closer to my world’: children with autism spectrum disorder tell their stories through photovoice. Global Public Health. 2016;11(5–6):546–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saturno CE, Garcia Ramirez AR, Conte MJ, et al. An augmentative and alternative communication tool for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Behav Inf Technol. 2015;34(6):632–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wintels SC, Smits DW, Van Wesel F, et al. How do adolescents with cerebral palsy participate? Learning from their personal experiences. Health Expect. 2018;21(6):1024–1034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll C, Sixsmith J. Exploring the facilitation of young children with disabilities in research about their early intervention service. Child Lang Teach Ther. 2016;32(3):313–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldner HA, Logan SW, Galloway JC. Mobility in pictures: a participatory photovoice narrative study exploring powered mobility provision for children and families. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;14:301–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington C, Foster M, Rodger S, et al. Engaging young people with Autism Spectrum Disorder in research interviews. Br J Learn Disabil. 2014;42(2):153–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teachman G, Gibson BE. Children and youth with disabilities: innovative methods for single qualitative interviews. Qual Health Res. 2013;23(2):264–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staniszewska S, Brett J, Simera I, et al. GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. Res Involv Engagem. 2017;3(1):13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shen S, Doyle-Thomas KAR, Beesley L, et al. How and why should we engage parents as co-researchers in health research? A scoping review of current practices. Health Expect. 2017;20(4):543–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney M, Robins M, Ruberu M, et al. African-American and Latino families in TADS: recruitment and treatment considerations. Cogn Behav Pract. 2005;12(2):221–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yancey AK, Ortega AN, Kumanyika SK. Effective recruitment and retention of minority research participants. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27(1):1–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006;26(1):13–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagliardi AR, Kothari A, Graham ID. Research agenda for integrated knowledge translation (IKT) in healthcare: what we know and do not yet know. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017;71(2):105–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagliardi AR, Berta W, Kothari A, et al. Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) in health care: a scoping review. Implement Sci. 2016;11:38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boote J, Baird W, Sutton A. Public involvement in the systematic review process in health and social care: a narrative review of case examples. Health Policy. 2011;102(2–3):105–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsabbagh M, Yusuf A, Prasanna S, et al. Community engagement and knowledge translation: progress and challenge in autism research. Autism. 2014;18(7):771–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen PH. Children’s participation in ethnographic research: issues of power and representation. Child Soc. 2004;18(2):165–176.
   Google Scholar
• Aldridge J. Picture this: the use of participatory photographic research methods with people with learning disabilities. Disabil Soc. 2006;22(1):1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter B, Ford K. Researching children’s health experiences: the place for participatory, child-centered, arts-based approaches. Res Nurs Health. 2013;36(1):95–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coad J. Using art-based techniques in engaging children and young people in health care consultations and/or research. J Res Nurs. 2007;12(5):487–497.
   Google Scholar
• Kembhavi G, Wirz S. Engaging adolescents with disabilities in research. ALTER. 2009;3(3):286–296.
   Google Scholar
• Mand K. Giving children a ‘voice’: arts-based participatory research activities and representation. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2012;15(2):149–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fargas-Malet M, McSherry D, Larkin E, et al. research with children: methodological issues and innovative techniques. J Early Child Res. 2010;8(2):175–192.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen T, Palisano RJ, Graham I. Perspectives and experiences with engaging youth and families in research. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2019;39:310–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnbull AP, Friesen BJ, Ramirez C. Participatory action research as a model for conducting family research. Res Pract Pers Severe Disabil. 1998;23:178–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boote J, Baird W, Beecroft C. Public involvement at the design stage of primary health research: a narrative review of case examples. Health Policy. 2010;95(1):10–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shippee ND, Domecq Garces JP, Prutsky Lopez GJ, et al. Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework. Health Expect. 2015;18(5):1151–1166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell T, Vat LE, McGavin C, et al. Co-building a patient-oriented research curriculum in Canada. Res Involv Engagem. 2019;5(1):7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mulvale G, Moll S, Miatello A, et al. Codesigning health and other public services with vulnerable and disadvantaged populations: insights from an international collaboration. Health Expect. 2019;22(3):284–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phoenix M, Nguyen T, Gentles SJ, et al. Using qualitative research perspectives to inform patient engagement in research. Res Involv Engagem. 2018;4(1):20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phoenix M, Rosenbaum P. Development and implementation of a paediatric rehabilitation care path for hard-to-reach families: a case report. Child Care Health Dev. 2015;41(3):494–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillis A, Mac Lellan M. Service learning with vulnerable populations: review of the literature. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2010;7(1):29.
   Google Scholar
• Halman M, Baker L, Ng S. Using critical consciousness to inform health professions education: a literature review. Perspect Med Educ. 2017;6(1):12–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar