Italian versions of the Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7: translation and validation in women with urinary incontinence

References

• Irwin DE, Kopp ZS, Agatep B, et al. Worldwide prevalence estimates of lower urinary tract symptoms, overactive bladder, urinary incontinence and bladder outlet obstruction. BJU Int. 2011;108(7):1132–1138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milsom I, Gyhagen M. The prevalence of urinary incontinence. Climacteric. 2019;22(3):217–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukacz ES, Santiago-Lastra Y, Albo ME, et al. Urinary incontinence in women: a review. JAMA. 2017;318(16):1592–1604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shumaker SA, Wyman JF, Uebersax JS, et al. Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program in Women (CPW) Research Group. Qual Life Res. 1994;3(5):291–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uebersax JS, Wyman JF, Shumaker SA, et al. Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program for Women Research Group. Neurourol Urodyn. 1995;14(2):131–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cam C, Sakalli M, Ay P, et al. Validation of the short forms of the incontinence impact questionnaire (IIQ-7) and the urogenital distress inventory (UDI-6) in a Turkish population. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(1):129–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Azab AS, Mascha EJ. Arabic validation of the Urogenital Distress Inventory and Adapted Incontinence Impact Questionnaires – short forms. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009; 28(1):33–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan SS, Choy KW, Lee BP, et al. Chinese validation of Urogenital Distress Inventory and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire short form. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(7):807–812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Viñaspre Hernández R, Tomás Aznar C, Rubio Aranda E. Validation of the Spanish version of the short forms of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) in pregnant women. Gac Sanit. 2011;25(5):379–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouallalene-Jaramillo K, Bagur-Calafat MC, Girabent-Farrés M. Validation of the Spanish version of the Urogenital Distress Inventory short form and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire short form for women between the ages of 18 and 65. Actas Urol Esp. 2015;39(8):511–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzén K, Johansson JE, Karlsson J, et al. Validation of the Swedish version of the incontinence impact questionnaire and the urogenital distress inventory. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92(5):555–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utomo E, Korfage IJ, Wildhagen MF, et al. Validation of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) in a Dutch population. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34(1):24–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nusee Z, Rusly A, Jamalludin AR, et al. Translation and validation of Bahasa Malaysia version of Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) and Incontinence Impact Quality of Life Questionnaires (IIQ-7), a cross sectional study. Malay J Med Sci. 2016;23(3):57–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skorupska KA, Miotla P, Kubik-Komar A, et al. Development and validation of the Polish version of the Urogenital Distress Inventory short form and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire short form. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;215:171–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi EPH, Lam CL, Chin WY. The incontinence impact questionnaire-7 (IIQ-7) can be applicable to Chinese males and females with lower urinary tract symptoms. Patient. 2014;7(4):403–411.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Faruqui N, Chughtai N, Ahmed J. Urdu translation and validation of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) in women with urinary incontinence. Arab J Urol. 2019;17(3):212–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momenimovahed Z, Tiznobaik A, Pakgohar M, et al. Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) and Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6): translation and psychometric validation of the Iranian version. J Clin Diagn Res. 2018;12:QC15–QC8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuven Y, Yohay Z, Glinter H, et al. Validation of the Hebrew version of the short form of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6). Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(12):1891–1894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Recommendations for the cross-cultural adaptation of the DASH & QuickDASH outcome measures. Toronto (Canada): Institute for Work & Health; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8(2):94–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artibani W, Pesce F, Prezioso D, et al. Italian validation of the Urogenital Distress Inventory and its application in LUTS patients. Eur Urol. 2006;50(6):1323–1329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Med Care. 1992;30:437–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apolone G, Mosconi P, Quattrociocchi L, et al. Questionario sullo stato di salute SF-12 – versione italiana. IRFMN [SF-12 health survey – Italian version]. Milano: Guerini; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10(1):22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans JD. Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences. Pacific Grove (CA): Brooks/Cole Publishing; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzo-Seva U, Ferrando PJ. Factor – manual of the program. Tarragona (Spain): Departament de Psicologia, Universitat Rovira i Virgili; 2006 [cited 2019 May 2]. Available from: http://psico.fcep.urv.es/utilitats/factor/
   Google Scholar
• Hobart JC, Cano SJ, Warner TT, Thompson AJ. What sample sizes for reliability and validity studies in neurology? J Neurol. 2012;259(12):2681–2694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (AT): R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2018. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Kottner J, Streiner DL. Internal consistency and Cronbach’s alpha: a comment on Beeckman et al. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;47(7):926–928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life – the assessment, analysis and reporting of patient-reported outcomes. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley & Sons; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, et al. Measurement in medicine. A practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar