758
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Rehabilitation in Practice

Developing a model of long-term social rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: the case of the head forward centre

, , ORCID Icon &
Pages 3405-3416 | Received 21 Aug 2018, Accepted 09 Mar 2020, Published online: 26 Mar 2020

References

  • Oddy M, McMillan TM. Future directions: brain injury services in 2010. In: Wood R, McMillan T, editors. Neurobehavioural disability and social handicap following traumatic brain injury. Hove: Psychology Press; 2001.
  • Willer B, Corrigan J. Whatever it takes: a model for community-based services. Brain Injury. 1994;8(7):647–659.
  • Brooks J, Shavelle R, Strauss D, et al. Long-term survival after traumatic brain injury Part II: life expectancy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(6):1000–1005.
  • Colantonio A, Ratcliff G, Chase S, et al. Long-term outcomes after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Disab Rehabil. 2004;26(5):253–261.
  • Eames P, Cotterill G, Kneale TA, et al. Outcome of intensive rehabilitation after severe brain injury: a long-term follow-up study. Brain Injury. 1996;10(9):631–650.
  • Fleminger S, Ponsford J. Long-term outcome after traumatic brain injury. Br Med J. 2005;331(7530):1419–1420.
  • Hoofien D, Gilboa A, Vakil E, et al. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) 10–20 years later: a comprehensive outcome study of psychiatric symptomatology, cognitive abilities and psychosocial functioning. Brain Inj. 2001;15(3):189–209.
  • Levack W, Kayes N, Fadyl J. Experience of recovery and outcome following traumatic brain injury: a metasynthesis of qualitative research. Disab Rehabil. 2010;32(12):986–999.
  • Mazaux J, Masson F, Levin H, et al. Long-term neuropsycho- logical outcome and loss of social autonomy after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78(12):1316–1320.
  • Wood R, Rutterford N. Psychosocial adjustment 17 years after severe brain injury. J Neurol, Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006;77(1):71–73.
  • Ponsford J, Spitz G. Stability of employment over the first 3 years following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2015;30(3):E1–E11.
  • Shames J, Treger I, Ring H, et al. Return to work following traumatic brain injury: trends and challenges. Disab Rehabil. 2007;29(17):1387–1395.
  • Tate R, Simpson G, McRae P. Traumatic Brain Injury. In Handbook of vocational rehabilitation and disability evaluation. Cham (Switzerland): Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 263–294.
  • Bier N, Dutil E, Couture M. Factors affecting leisure participation after a traumatic brain injury: An exploratory study. J Head Trauma Rehab. 2009;24(3):187–194.
  • Brown M, Gordon W. a, Spielman L. Participation in social and recreational activity in the community by individuals with traumatic brain injury. Rehabil Psychol. 2003;48(4):266–274.
  • Fleming J, Braithwaite H, Gustafsson L, et al. Participation in leisure activities during brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Injury. 2011;25(9):806–818.
  • Wise E, Mathews-Dalton C, Dikmen S, et al. Impact of traumatic brain injury on participation in leisure activities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(9):1357–1362.
  • Winkler D, Unsworth C, Sloan S. Time use following a severe traumatic brain injury. J Occup Sci. 2005;12(2):69–81.
  • Dawson D, Chipman M. The disablement experienced by traumatically brain-injured adults living in the community. Brain Injury. 1995;9(4):339–353.
  • Elsass L, Kinsella G. Social interaction following severe closed head injury. Psychol Med. 1987;17(1):67–78.
  • Finset A, Dyrnes S, Krogstad J, et al. Self-reported social networks and interpersonal support 2 years after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury. 1995;9(2):141–150.
  • Kozloff R. Networks of social support and the outcome from severe head injury. J Head Trauma Rehab. 1987;2(3):14–23.
  • Kinsella G, Ford B, Moran C. Survival of social relationships following head injury. Int Disab Stud. 1989;11(1):9–14.
  • Mukherjee D, Reis J, Heller W. Women living with traumatic brain injury: social isolation, emotional functioning and implications for psychotherapy. Women Ther. 2003;26(1/2):3–26.
  • Olver J, Ponsford J, Curran C. Outcome following traumatic brain injury: a comparison between 2 and 5 years after injury. Brain Injury. 1996;10(11):841–848.
  • Thomsen I. Late outcome of very severe blunt head trauma: a 10–15 year second follow-up. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984;47(3):260–268.
  • Salas CE, Casassus M, Rowlands L, et al. Relating through sameness’: a qualitative study of social isolation and friendship in chronic traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2018;28(7):1161–1178.
  • Douglas J. Loss of friendship following traumatic brain injury: a model grounded in the experience of adults with severe injury. Neuropsychol Rehabilitation. 2019;8:1–26.
  • Sander A, Struchen M. Interpersonal relationships and traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehab. 2011;26(1):1–3.
  • Tyerman A, King N. Psychological approaches to rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury. Malden: Blackwell; 2008.
  • Greenwood R, McMillan T. Models of rehabilitation programmes for the brain-injured adult. I: current provision, efficacy and good practice. Clin Rehabil. 1993;7(3):248–255.
  • Select Committee on Health. Third report: head injury. Rehabilitation. London: House of Commons; 2001.
  • McMillan T, Oddy M. Service provision for social disability and handicap after acquired brain injury. In: McMillan T, Wood R, editors. Neurobehavioural disability and social handicap following traumatic brain injury. Oxon: Routledge; 2001. p. 257–273.
  • Martelli M, Zasler N, Tiernan P. Community based rehabilitation: special issues. Neuro Rehabil-An Interdiscipl J. 2012;31(1):3–18.
  • Douglas J, Dyson M, Foreman P. Increasing leisure activity following severe traumatic brain injury: Does it make a difference? Brain Impairment. 2006;7(2):107–118.
  • Gerber G, Gargaro J. Participation in a social and recreational day programme increases community integration and reduces family burden of persons with acquired brain injury. Brain Injury. 2015;29(6):722–729.
  • Hutchinson S, Loy D, Kleiber D, et al. Leisure as a coping resource: variations in coping with traumatic injury and illness. Leisure Sci. 2003;25(2–3):143–161.
  • McLean A, Jarus T, Hubley A, et al. Differences in social participation between individuals who do and do not attend brain injury drop-in centres: a preliminary study. Brain Injury. 2012;26(1):83–94.
  • McLean A, Jarus T, Hubley A, et al. Associations between social participation and subjective quality of life for adults with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(17):1409–1418.
  • Tate R, Wakim D, Genders M. A systematic review of the efficacy of community-based, leisure/social activity programmes for people with traumatic brain injury. Brain Impairment. 2014;15(3):157–176.
  • Ben-Yishay Y, Diller L. Handbook of holistic neuropsychological rehabilitation. Outpatient rehabilitation of traumatic brain injury. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.
  • Klonoff P. The art and science of milieu- oriented neurorehabilitation. Barrow Quarterly. 2005;21(2):14–21.
  • Prigatano G. Principles of neuropsychological rehabilitation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999.
  • Wilson B, Gracey F. Towards a comprehensive model of neuropsychological rehabilitation. In: Wilson B, Gracey F, Evans J, Bateman A, editors. Neuropsychological rehabilitation. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 1–21.
  • Head Forward Centre for Social Rehabilitation after TBI. 2016 [cited 2016 Jan]. Available from: http://www.headforward.org.
  • Matheson K, Anisman H. Biological and psychosocial responses to discrimination. The social cure: identity, health and well-being. New York: Psychology Press; 2012. p. 133–153.
  • Boake C. Supervision Rating Scale: a measure of functional outcome from brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(8):765–772.
  • Berger R. Now I see it, now I don’t: researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qual Res. 2015;15(2):219–234.
  • Paterson B, Scott-Findlay S. Critical issues in interviewing people with traumatic brain injury. Qual Health Res. 2002;12(3):399–409.
  • Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101.
  • Wilson B, editor. Neuropsychological rehabilitation theory and practice. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger; 2005.
  • Maguire M, Delahunt B. Doing a thematic analysis: a practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. AISHE-J: Ireland J Teach Learn Higher Educa. 2017;9(3). Available from: https://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/335/0
  • Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, et al. Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16(1):160940691773384–160940691773313.
  • Gill IJ, Wall G, Simpson J. Clients’ perspectives of rehabilitation in one acquired brain injury residential rehabilitation unit: a thematic analysis. Brain Injury. 2012;26(7–8):909–920.
  • Ben-Yishay Y. Reflections on the evolution of the therapeutic milieu concept. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1996;6(4):327–343.
  • Wilson B, Gracey F, Evans J, et al. Neuropsychological rehabilitation. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
  • Klonoff P. Individual and group psychotherapy in milieu-oriented neurorehabilitation. Applied Neuropsychol. 1997;4(2):107–118.
  • Coetzer R. Psychotherapy after acquired brain injury: is less more. Chilean J Neuropsychol. 2013;8:36–41.
  • Prigatano G. Work, love, and play after brain injury. Bull Menninger Clin. 1989;53(5):414–431.
  • Malley D, Bateman A, Gracey F. Practically based project groups. In: Wilson B, Gracey F, Evans J, Bateman A, editors. Neuropsychological rehabilitation. theory, models, therapy and outcome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 164–180.
  • Gracey F, Yeates G, Palmer S, et al. The psychological support group. In: Wilson B, Gracey F, Evans J, Bateman A, editors. Neuropsychological rehabilitation. theory, models, therapy and outcome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 123–136.
  • Douglas J, Drummond M, Knox L, et al. Rethinking social-relational perspectives in rehabilitation: traumatic brain injury as a case study. In: McPherson K, Gibson B, Leplege A, editors. Rethinking rehabilitation theory and practice. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2015. p. 137–162.
  • Douglas J. Social Linkage, self-concept, and well-being after severe traumatic brain injury. In: Jetten J, Haslam C, Haslam A, editors. The social cure: identity, health and well-being. Hove: Psychology Press; 2012. p. 237–254.
  • Gracey F, Ownsworth T. The experience of self in the world: the personal and social contexts of identity change after brain injury. In: Jetten J, Haslam C, Haslam A, editors. The social cure: identity, health and well-being. Hove: Psychology Press; 2012. p. 273–295.
  • Douglas JM. Conceptualizing self and maintaining social connection following severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury. 2013;27(1):60–74.
  • Haslam C, Holme A, Haslam S, et al. Maintaining group memberships: social identity continuity predicts well-being after stroke. Neuropsycholog Rehabil. 2008;18(5–6):671–691.
  • Helliwell J, Barrington-Leigh C. How much is social capital worth? In: Jetten J, Haslam C, Haslam A, editors. The social cure: identity, health and well-being. Hove: Psychology Press; 2012. p. 55–71.
  • Carlsson E, Paterson B, Scott-Findlay S, et al. Methodological issues in interviews involving people with communication impairments after acquired brain damage. Qual Health Res. 2007;17(10):1361–1371.
  • Prigatano G. 1994 Sheldon Berrol, MD, senior lectureship: the problem of lost normality after brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehab. 1995;10(3):88–95.
  • Jumisko E, Lexell J, Söderberg S. The experiences of treatment from other people as narrated by people with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury and their close relatives. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(19):1535–1543.
  • Paterson J, Stewart J. Adults with acquired brain injury: perceptions of their social world. Rehabil Nursing. 2002;27(1):13–18.
  • Riley G, Hagger B. Disclosure of a stigmatized identity: a qualitative study of the reasons why people choose to tell or not tell others about their traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury. 2015;29(12):1480–1489.
  • Nochi M. Loss of self” in the narratives of people with traumatic brain injuries: a qualitative analysis. Soc Sci Med. 1998;46(7):869–878.
  • Alston M, Jones J, Curtin M. Women and traumatic brain injury: “It’s not visible damage. Aust Soc Work. 2012;65(1):39–53.
  • Freeman A, Adams M, Ashworth F. An exploration of the experience of self in the social world for men following traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2015;25(2):189–215.
  • Gracey F, Evans J, Malley D. Capturing process and outcome in complex rehabilitation interventions: a “Y-shaped” model. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2009;19(6):867–890.
  • Ownsworth T. 2014. Self-identity after brain injury. Hove: Psychology Press.
  • Silverman A, Molton I, Smith A, et al. Solace in solidarity: disability friendship networks buffer well-being. Rehabil Psychol. 2017;62(4):525–533.
  • Salmon N. We just stick together’: how disabled teens negotiate stigma to create lasting friendship. J Intellect Disab Res. 2013;57(4):347–358.
  • Hagen C, Malkmus D, Durham P. Rancho Los Amigos levels of cognitive functioning scale. Downey (CA): Professional Staff Association; 1972.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.