The Arabic Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale-8 (ASES-8): a valid and reliable measure of evaluating self-efficacy in Palestinian patients with rheumatoid arthritis

References

• Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Adv Behav Res Ther. 1978;1(4):139–161.
   Google Scholar
• Marks R, Allegrante JP, Lorig K. A review and synthesis of research evidence for self-efficacy-enhancing interventions for reducing chronic disability: implications for health education practice (part I). Health Promot Pract. 2005;6(1):37–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jackson T, Xu T, Jia X. Arthritis self-efficacy beliefs and functioning among osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis patients: a meta-analytic review. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kez219
   Google Scholar
• van den Bemt BJF, Zwikker HE, van den Ende C. Medication adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a critical appraisal of the existing literature. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2012;8(4):337–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks R, Allegrante JP. A review and synthesis of research evidence for self-efficacy-enhancing interventions for reducing chronic disability: implications for health education practice (part II). Health Promot Pract. 2005;6(2):148–156.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taal E, Rasker JJ, Wiegman O. Patient education and self‐management in the rheumatic diseases: a self‐efficacy approach. Arthritis Care Res. 1996;9(3):229–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garratt AM, Lochting I, Smedslund G, et al. Measurement properties of instruments assessing self-efficacy in patients with rheumatic diseases. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014;53(7):1161–1171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorig K, Chastain RL, Ung E, et al. Development and evaluation of a scale to measure perceived self-efficacy in people with arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 1989;32(1):37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Brady TJ. Measures of self-efficacy: Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES), Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale-8 Item (ASES-8), Children’s Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (CASE), Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scale (CDSES), Parent’s Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (PASE), and Rheumatoid Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (RASE). Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(S11):S473–S85.
   Google Scholar
• Lorig K, Chastain R, Ung E, et al. 2019. Available from: https://www.selfmanagementresource.com/docs/pdfs/English_-_self-efficacy_arthritis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Silva R, Silva FC, Meireles SM, et al. Translation to Brazilian Portuguese, cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of 8-item ArthritisSelf-Efficacy Scale (ASES-8). Sao Paulo Med J. 2019;137(1):6–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao L, Zhang XC, Li MM, et al. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale-8 (ASES-8) in a rheumatoid arthritis population. Rheumatol Int. 2017;37(5):751–756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox S, Schoffman DE, Dowda M, et al. Psychometric properties of the 8-item English arthritis self-efficacy scale in a diverse sample. Arthritis. 2014;2014:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller A, Hartmann M, Mueller K, et al. Validation of the arthritis self‐efficacy short‐form scale in German fibromyalgia patients. Eur J Pain. 2003;7(2):163–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez VM, Stewart A, Ritter PL, et al. Translation and validation of arthritis outcome measures into Spanish. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38(10):1429–1446.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Translation ITFf, Cultural A. Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8(2):94–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:3186–3191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drennan J. Cognitive interviewing: verbal data in the design and pretesting of questionnaires. J Adv Nurs. 2003;42(1):57–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1988;31(3):315–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathiowetz V. Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength measurements. Crit Rev Phys Rehab Med. 1991;2:201–212.
   Google Scholar
• Alghadir AH, Anwer S, Iqbal ZA. The psychometric properties of an Arabic numeric pain rating scale for measuring osteoarthritis knee pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(24):2392–2397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware J, Snoww K, Ma K, et al. SF36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Hewlett S, Hehir M, Kirwan JR. Measuring fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of scales in use. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57(3):429–439.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khader S, Houroni MM, Al Akour N. Normative data and psychometric properties of short form 36 health survey (SF-36, version 1.0) in the population of north Jordan. East Mediterr Health J. 2011;17(05):368–374.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coons SJ, Draugalis JR, Hays RD. Translation of the RAND 36-Item Health Survey l. 0 (aka SF-36) into Arabic. 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Sheikh KA, Yagoub U, Elsatouhy M, et al. Reliability and validity of the Arabic version of the SF-36 health survey questionnaire in population of Khat Chewers—Jazan Region-Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Appl Res Qual Life. 2015;10(1):1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, et al. An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: the PHQ–4. Psychosomatics. 2009;50(6):613–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer F, Manea L, Trepel D, et al. Screening for anxiety disorders with the GAD-7 and GAD-2: a systematic review and diagnostic metaanalysis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2016;39:24–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson A, Bostrom KB, Gustavsson P, et al. Which instruments to support diagnosis of depression have sufficient accuracy? A systematic review. Nord J Psychiatry. 2015;69(7):497–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, et al. The patient health questionnaire somatic, anxiety, and depressive symptom scales: a systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010;32(4):345–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlHadi AN, AlAteeq DA, Al-Sharif E, et al. An arabic translation, reliability, and validation of patient health questionnaire in a Saudi sample. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2017;16(1):32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(5):1038–1046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochi K, Iwamoto T, Saito A, et al. Construct validity, reliability, response rate, and association with disease activity of the quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire in the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol. 2015;25(2):241–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salaffi F, Di Carlo M, Carotti M, et al. Validity and interpretability of the QuickDASH in the assessment of hand disability in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2019;39(5):923–932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver CS. You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: consider the brief COPE. Int J Behav Med. 1997;4(1):92–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper C, Katona C, Orrell M, et al. Coping strategies and anxiety in caregivers of people with Alzheimer’s disease: the LASER-AD study. J Affect Disord. 2006;90(1):15–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krägeloh CU. A systematic review of studies using the brief COPE: religious coping in factor analyses. Religions. 2011;2(3):216–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rzeszutek M, Oniszczenko W, Kwiatkowska B. Stress coping strategies, spirituality, social support and posttraumatic growth in a Polish sample of rheumatoid arthritis patients. Psychol Health Med. 2017;22(9):1082–1088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nawel H, Elisabeth S. Adaptation and validation of the Tunisian version of the Brief COPE Scale. Eur Health Psychol. 2015;17(S):783.
   Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gliem JA, Gliem RR. Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education. Columbus: The Ohio State University; 2003. p. 82–88.
   Google Scholar
• Field AP. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Los Angeles, London: SAGE; 2018. xxix, 1070 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Pett MA, Lackey NR, Sullivan JJ. Making sense of factor analysis: the use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications; 2003. xvi, 348 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser HF, Rice J. Little jiffy, mark IV. Educ Psychol Meas. 1974;34(1):111–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimberlin CL, Winterstein AG. Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008;65(23):2276–2284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Vollenhoven RF. Sex differences in rheumatoid arthritis: more than meets the eye. BMC Med. 2009;7(1):12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marks R. Self-efficacy and arthritis disability: an updated synthesis of the evidence base and its relevance to optimal patient care. Health Psychol Open. 2014;1(1):2055102914564582.
   Google Scholar
• Williams B, Onsman A, Brown T. Exploratory factor analysis: a five-step guide for novices. Australasian J Paramed. 2010;8(3):1–13. Available from: http://ro.ecu.edu.au/jephc/vol8/iss3/1
   Google Scholar
• Watson R, Thompson DR. Use of factor analysis in journal of advanced nursing: literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2006;55(3):330–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar