Lifting capacity is associated with central sensitization and non-organic signs in patients with chronic back pain

References

• Bevan S. Economic impact of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) on work in Europe. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2015;29(3):356–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, et al. The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(6):968–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross DP, Battie MC, Cassidy JD. The prognostic value of functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: part 1: timely return to work. Spine. 2004;29(8):914–919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reneman MF, Fokkens AS, Dijkstra PU, et al. Testing lifting capacity: validity of determining effort level by means of observation. Spine. 2005;30(2):E40–E46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansuategui Echeita J, Bethge M, van Holland BJ, et al. Functional capacity evaluation in different societal contexts: results of a multicountry study. J Occup Rehabil. 2019;29(1):222–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oesch P, Meyer K, Jansen B, et al. Functional capacity evaluation: performance of patients with chronic non-specific low back pain without Waddell signs. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(2):257–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oesch P, Meyer K, Jansen B, et al. What is the role of “nonorganic somatic components” in functional capacity evaluations in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain undergoing fitness for work evaluation? Spine. 2012;37(4):E243–E250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fore L, Perez Y, Neblett R, et al. Improved functional capacity evaluation performance predicts successful return to work one year after completing a functional restoration rehabilitation program. Pm R. 2015;7(4):365–375.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bieniek S, Bethge M. The reliability of WorkWell systems functional capacity evaluation: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15(1):106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Isernhagen SJ, Hart DL, Matheson LM. Reliability of independent observer judgments of level of lift effort in a kinesiophysical functional capacity evaluation. Work. 1999;12(2):145–150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gouttebarge V, Wind H, Kuijer PP, et al. Reliability and validity of functional capacity evaluation methods: a systematic review with reference to Blankenship system, Ergos work simulator, Ergo-Kit and Isernhagen work system. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2004;77(8):527–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddell G, McCulloch JA, Kummel E, et al. Nonorganic physical signs in low-back pain. Spine. 1980;5(2):117–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolf CJ. Central sensitization: implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain. Pain. 2011;152(3 Suppl.):S2–S15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neill S, Manniche C, Graven-Nielsen T, et al. Generalized deep-tissue hyperalgesia in patients with chronic low-back pain. Eur J Pain. 2007;11(4):415–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• General Assembly of the World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Am Coll Dent. 2014;81(3):14–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayer TG, Neblett R, Cohen H, et al. The development and psychometric validation of the central sensitization inventory. Pain Pract. 2012;12(4):276–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kregel J, Vuijk PJ, Descheemaeker F, et al. The Dutch Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI): factor analysis, discriminative power, and test–retest reliability. Clin J Pain. 2016;32(7):624–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scerbo T, Colasurdo J, Dunn S, et al. Measurement properties of the central sensitization inventory: a systematic review. Pain Pract. 2018;18(4):544–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apeldoorn AT, Bosselaar H, Blom-Luberti T, et al. The reliability of nonorganic sign-testing and the Waddell score in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine. 2008;33(7):821–826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tait RC, Chibnall JT, Krause S. The pain disability index: psychometric properties. Pain. 1990;40(2):171–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg G. Borg’s perceived exertion and pain scales. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics;1998.
   Google Scholar
• Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, et al. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS pain), Numeric Rating Scale for pain (NRS pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(S11):S240–S252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicklin J, Cramp F, Kirwan J, et al. Measuring fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study to evaluate the Bristol rheumatoid arthritis fatigue multi-dimensional questionnaire, visual analog scales, and numerical rating scales. Arthritis Care Res. 2010;62(11):1559–1568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vendrig L. De Vragenlijst ArbeidsReïntegratie: constructvaliditeit en predictieve validiteit. Diagnostiek-Wijzer. 2005;8:27–39.
   Google Scholar
• Vendrig L, Hove M, van Meijel M, et al. Voorspellen van de verwachte verzuimduur met de Vragenlijst ArbeidsReïntegratie (VAR). Tijdschrift Voor Bedrijfs-EN Verzekeringsgeneeskunde. 2011;19(1):7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates;1988.
   Google Scholar
• van Wilgen CP, Vuijk PJ, Kregel J, et al. Psychological distress and widespread pain contribute to the variance of the central sensitization inventory: a cross-sectional study in patients with chronic pain. Pain Pract. 2018;18(2):239–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbain DA, Cole B, Cutler R, et al. A structured evidence-based review on the meaning of nonorganic physical signs: Waddell signs. Pain Med. 2003;4(2):141–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar