908
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedure

Evaluation of the MCAST, a multidisciplinary toolkit to improve mental capacity assessment

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 323-330 | Received 10 Jan 2020, Accepted 01 May 2020, Published online: 23 May 2020

References

  • Peisah C. Capacity assessment. In: Chiu H, Shulman K, editors. Mental health and illness worldwide: mental health and illness of the elderly. New York (NY): Springer; 2017. p. 369–398.
  • Office of Public Sector Information. Mental Capacity Act 2005. London (UK): OPSI; 2005.
  • Peisah C, Lerman Y, Herrmann N, et al. Piloting the global capacity education e-tool: can capacity be taught to health care professionals across different international jurisdictions? Int Psychogeriatr. 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 20]. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610219000723
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Decision-making and mental capacity [NICE guideline NG108]. [cited 2018 Oct 20]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng108
  • House of Lords. Mental capacity act post-legislative scrutiny. London (UK): HMSO; 2014.
  • Williams V, Boyle G, Jepson M, et al. Making best interests decisions: people and processes. [cited 2012 Jun 29]. Available from: https://www.mentalhealth.org.uk/content/assets/PDF/publications/BIDS_report_24-02-12_FINAL1.pdf?view=Standard
  • Wade DT. Determining whether someone has mental capacity to make a decision: clinical guidance based on a review of the evidence. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(10):1561–1570.
  • Wade DT, Kitzinger C. Making healthcare decisions in a person’s best interests when they lack capacity: clinical guidance based on a review of evidence. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(10):1571–1585.
  • Ferguson A, Duffield G, Worrall L. Legal decision making by people with aphasia: critical incidents for speech pathologists. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2010;45(2):244–258.
  • McCormick M, Bose A, Marinis T. Decision-making capacity in aphasia: SLT’s contribution in England. Aphasiology. 2017;31(11):1344–1358.
  • Rubin J. Handbook of usability testing: how to plan, design, and conduct effective tests. New York (NY): Wiley; 1994.
  • Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38(2):65–76.
  • Rekha Devi KH, Sen AM, Hemachandran K. A working framework for the user-centred design approach and a survey of available methods. Int J Sci Res Pub. 2012;2(4):1–8.
  • Needham C, Carr S. SCIE research briefing 31: co-production: an emerging evidence base for adult social care transformation. London (UK): Social Care Institute for Excellence; 2009.
  • Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337(7676):979–983.
  • Jayes M, Palmer R, Enderby P, et al. How do health and social care professionals in England and Wales assess mental capacity? A literature review. Disabil Rehabil. 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 20]. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610219000723
  • Jayes M, Palmer R, Enderby P. An exploration of mental capacity assessment within acute hospital and intermediate care settings in England: a focus group study. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(21):2148–2157.
  • Jayes M, Palmer R, Enderby P. Development of a mental capacity assessment support tool: a user-centred design process. Int J Stroke. 2015;10(s5):65.
  • Cooke J, Langley J, Wolstenholme D, et al. “Seeing” the difference: the importance of visibility and action as a mark of “authenticity” in co-production. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016;6(6):345–348.
  • Creswell JWP, Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 3rd ed. Los Angeles (CA): SAGE; 2017.
  • Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research in health care: assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ. 2000;320(7226):50–52.
  • Professional Practice Board & Social Care Institute for Excellence. Audit tool for mental capacity assessments. Leicester: British Psychological Society; 2010 [cited 2015 Aug 9]. Available from: http://www.bps.org.uk/sites/default/files/documents/audit-tool-mental-capacity-assessments_0.pdf
  • Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess A, editors. Analysing qualitative data. London (UK): Routledge; 1994. p. 173–194.
  • Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, et al. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:117.
  • O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. BMJ. 2010;341:c4587.
  • Tonkin-Crine S, Anthierens S, Hood K. Discrepancies between qualitative and quantitative evaluation of randomised controlled trial results: achieving clarity through mixed methods triangulation. Implement Sci. 2016;11:66.
  • Farmer T, Robinson K, Elliott SJ, et al. Developing and implementing a triangulation protocol for qualitative health research. Qual Health Res. 2006;16(3):377–394.
  • Boyle G. Early implementation of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 in health and social care. Crit Soc Pol. 2011;31(3):365–387.
  • Guyver P, Hindle P, Harrison J, et al. The Mental Capacity Act 2005: review of mental capacity assessment in people with proximal femoral fracture. Psychiatrist. 2010;34(7):284–286.
  • Ramasubramanian L, Ranasinghe N, Ellison J. Evaluation of a structured assessment framework to enable adherence to the requirements of Mental Capacity Act 2005. Br J Learn Disabil. 2011;39(4):314–320.
  • Marshall H, Sprung S. The Mental Capacity Act: 10 years on – the key learning areas for healthcare professionals. NRR. 2018;8:29–38.
  • Murrell A, McCalla L. Assessing decision-making capacity: the interpretation and implementation of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 amongst social care professionals. Pract Soc Work Action. 2016;28(1):21–26.
  • Pennington C, Davey K, Meulen RT, et al. Tools for testing decision-making capacity in dementia. Age Ageing. 2018;47(6):778–784.
  • Grisso T, Appelbaum PS, Hill-Fotouhi C. The MacCAT-T: a clinical tool to assess patients’ capacities to make treatment decisions. Psychiatr Serv. 1997;48(11):1415–1414.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.