Work capacity assessments and efforts to achieve a job match for claimants in a social security setting: an international inventory

References

• OECD. Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers. a synthesis of findings across OECD countries. Paris: OECD; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bickenbach J, Posarac A, Cieza A, et al. approach. Washington (DC): World Bank; 2015. Report nr ACS14124.
   Google Scholar
• Choe C, Baldwin ML. Duration of disability, job mismatch and employment outcomes. Appl Econ. 2017;49(10):1001–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin S, Curran J, Iantorno J, et al. Work capacity assessment and return to work: a scoping review. Work. 2013;44(1):37–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WHO. ICF: International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. World report on disability. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Tengland PA. The concept of work ability. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(2):275–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl C, Svensson T, Petersson G, et al. Swedish rehabilitation professionals’ perspectives on work ability assessments in a changing sickness insurance system. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(15–16):1373–1382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger BB, Garthwaite K, Warren J, et al. Assessing work disability for social security benefits: international models for the direct assessment of work capacity. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(24):2962–2970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards JR. Person-job fit: a conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique. John Wiley & Sons. 1991;6:283–357.
   Google Scholar
• Nutzi M, Trezzini B, Medici L, et al. Job matching: an interdisciplinary scoping study with implications for vocational rehabilitation counseling. Rehabil Psychol. 2017;62(1):45–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velozo C. Work evaluations: critique of the state of the art of functional assessment of work. Am J Occup Ther. 1993;47(3):203–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pransky G, Shaw W, Franche RL, et al. Disability prevention and communication among workers, physicians, employers, and insurers-current models and opportunities for improvement. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(11):625–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homa DB. Using the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) in job placement. Work 2007;29(4):277–286.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lederer V, Loisel P, Rivard M, et al. Exploring the diversity of conceptualizations of work (dis)ability: a scoping review of published definitions. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24(2):242–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl C, Seing I, Gerdle B, et al. Fair or square? Experiences of introducing a new method for assessing general work ability in a sickness insurance context. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(6):656–665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson EA, Seing I, Sandqvist J, et al. Communication characteristics between clients and stakeholders within the swedish sickness insurance system – a document analysis of granted and withdrawn sickness benefit claims. Disabil Rehabil. 2019. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1592247
   Google Scholar
• Loisel P, Anema JR. Handbook of work disability. Prevention and management. New York: Springer; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• MacEachen E. The science and politics of work disability prevention. New York: Routledge; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Barr B, Taylor-Robinson D, Stuckler D, et al. Fit-for-work or fit-for-unemployment? does the reassessment of disability benefit claimants using a tougher work capability assessment help people into work? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016;70(5):452–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell A. Work and health programme. Briefing paper. London: House of Commons Library; 2018. Report nr. 7845.
   Google Scholar
• Social Security Administration [US]. Disability evaluation under social security. [cited 2020 Aug 17]. Available from: https://www.ssa.gov/disability/professionals/bluebook/AdultListings.htm. accessed june, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Social Security Administration, Office of Retirement and Disability Policy. Red book 2018. Baltimore: Social Security Administration, Office of Retirement and Disability Policy; 2018. Report nr 64–030.
   Google Scholar
• Snippen NC, de Vries HJ, van der Burg-Vermeulen SJ, et al. Influence of significant others on work participation of individuals with chronic diseases: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019;9(1):e021742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brongers KA, Cornelius B, Roelofs PDDM, et al. Feasibility of family group conference to promote return-to-work of persons receiving work disability benefit. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;16:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajnes D, Notaro T. Vocational factors in disability claim assessment: a Comparative survey of 11 Countries. Social Security Bulletin. 2019;79(2):1–50.
   Google Scholar
• Noone JH, Bohle P, Mackey M. Matching work capacity and job demands: toward an enhanced measure of work ability. J Occup Environ Med. 2015;57(12):1360–1364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kompier M. Assessing the psychosocial work environment-“subjective” versus “objective” measurement. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2005;31(6):405–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nutzi M, Trezzini B, Staubli S, et al. An interdisciplinary approach to job matching: developing an occupation-specific job matching tool for reintegrating persons with spinal cord injury into the labor market. Disabil Rehabil. 2019:42(16):2359–2373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zijlstra F, Van Ruitenbeek G, Mulders H, et al. Designing work for inclusiveness. In: A Arenas, D Di Marco, L Munduate, M. Euwema, editors. Shaping inclusive workplaces through social dialogue. industrial relations & conflict management. New York: Springer; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Anema JR, Schellart AJ, Cassidy JD, et al. Can cross country differences in return-to-work after chronic occupational back pain be explained? an exploratory analysis on disability policies in a six country cohort study. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(4):419–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimeno D, Bultmann U, Benavides FG, et al. Cross-national comparisons of sickness absence systems and statistics: towards common indicators. Eur J Public Health. 2014;24(4):663–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lexén A, Emmelin M, Bejerholm U. Individual placement and support is the keyhole: employer experiences of supporting persons with mental illness. J Vocat Rehabil. 2016;44(2):135–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar