582
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

Practice effect and reliability of the motor-free visual perception test-4 over multiple assessments in patients with stroke

, , , , ORCID Icon &
Pages 2456-2463 | Received 03 Mar 2020, Accepted 07 Oct 2020, Published online: 25 Oct 2020

References

  • Edmans JA, Lincoln NB. The frequency of perceptual deficits after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 1987;1(4):273–281.
  • Jones SA, Shinton RA. Improving outcome in stroke patients with visual problems. Age Ageing. 2006;35(6):560–565.
  • Edmans JA, Towle D, Lincoln NB. The recovery of perceptual problems after stroke and the impact on daily life. Clin Rehabil. 1991;5(4):301–310.
  • Mercier L, Audet T, Hébert R, et al. Impact of motor, cognitive, and perceptual disorders on ability to perform activities of daily living after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32(11):2602–2608.
  • Brown T, Elliot S, Bourne R, et al. The convergent validity of the developmental test of visual perception-adolescent and adults, motor-free visual perception test-third edition and test of visual perceptional skills (non-motor)-third edition when used with adults. Br J Occup Ther. 2012;75(3):134–143.
  • Colarusso RP, Hammill DD. Motor-free visual perception test-4. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications, Inc.; 2015.
  • Chiu EC, Koh CL, Tsai CY, et al. Practice effects and test-re-test reliability of the Five Digit Test in patients with stroke over four serial assessments. Brain Inj. 2014;28(13–14):1726–1733.
  • Matthey S. Calculating clinically significant change in postnatal depression studies using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. J Affect Disord. 2004;78(3):269–272.
  • Hobart JC, Riazi A, Lamping DL, et al. Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: development of a patient-based measure of outcome. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8(9):iii, 1–48.
  • Burtner PA, Qualls C, Ortega SG, et al. Test-retest reliability of the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test Revised (MVPT-R) in children with and without learning disabilities. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2002;22(3-4):23–36.
  • Tsai LT, Lin KC, Liao HF, et al. Reliability of two visual-perceptual tests for children with cerebral palsy. Am J Occup Ther. 2009;63(4):473–480.
  • Brown T, Bourne R, Sutton E, et al. The reliability of three visual perception tests used to assess adults. Percept Mot Skills. 2010;111(1):45–59.
  • Hamaker EL, van Hattum P, Kuiper RM, et al. Model selection based on information criteria in multilevel modeling. Handbook for advanced multilevel analysis., European Association for Methodology series. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group; 2011. p. 231–255.
  • Kelley K, Preacher KJ. On effect size. Psychol Methods. 2012;17(2):137–152.
  • Koh CL, Lu WS, Chen HC, et al. Test-retest reliability and practice effect of the oral-format Symbol Digit Modalities Test in patients with stroke. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2011;26(4):356–363.
  • Raymond PD, Hinton-Bayre AD, Radel M, et al. Assessment of statistical change criteria used to define significant change in neuropsychological test performance following cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;29(1):82–88.
  • Bushnell CD, Johnston DC, Goldstein LB. Retrospective assessment of initial stroke severity: comparison of the NIH Stroke Scale and the Canadian Neurological Scale. Stroke. 2001;32(3):656–660.
  • Martin Bland J, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;327(8476):307–310.
  • Pashler H, Baylis G. Procedural learning: 2. intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks. J Exp Psychol. 1991;17(1):33–48.
  • Chiu EC, Wu WC, Chou CX, et al. Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of the Test of Visual Perceptual Skills-Third Edition in patients with Stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(11):1917–1923.
  • Withiel TD, Wong D, Ponsford JL, et al. Comparing memory group training and computerized cognitive training for improving memory function following stroke: a phase II randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med. 2019;51(5):343–351.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.