The impact of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) on Victorian guardianship practice

References

• Kayess R, French P. Out of darkness into light? Introducing the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Hum Rights Law Rev. 2008;8:1–34.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. The convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. 2006. Available from: http://whttps://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities-2.html
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: declarations and reservations (Australia). 2008. Available from: https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-15&chapter=4#EndDec
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 1948.
   Google Scholar
• Ward M. Coming of age in the age of self determination. In: Sands DJ, Wehmeyer ML, editors. Self-determination across the life span: independence and choice for people with disabilities. Baltimore (MD): P.H. Brookes Pub.; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Burton Smith R, Morgan M, Davidson J. Does the daily choice making of adults with intellectual disability meet the normalisation principle? J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2005;30:226–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agran M, Storey K, Krupp M. Choosing and choice making are not the same: asking “what do you want for lunch?” is not self-determination. J Vocat Rehabil. 2010;33:77–88.
   Google Scholar
• Singer P. Practical ethics. 2nd ed. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Werner S, Holler R. Attitudes toward guardianship, social work goals, and perspectives of disability among social work students. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42:712–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson J, Wilson E, Hagiliassis N. Supporting end of life decision making: case studies of relational closeness in supported decision making for people with severe or profound intellectual disability. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2017;30:1022–1034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson J. Assumptions of decision-making capacity: the role supporter attitudes play in the realisation of Article 12 for people with severe or profound intellectual disability. Laws. 2016;5:6.
   Google Scholar
• Arstein-Kerslake A, Flynn E. The General Comment on Article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: a roadmap for equality before the law. Int J Hum Rights. 2016;20:471–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arstein-Kerslake A, Black J. Right to legal capacity in therapeutic jurisprudence: insights from critical disability theory and the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2020;68:101535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavaino N. Conceptualizing capacity: interpreting Canada’s qualified ratification of article 12 of the UN disability rights convention. Western J Legal Stud. 2014;4:1–25.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Treaty Collection. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: declarations and reservations. 2007. Available from: http://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-15&chapter=4&lang=en#EndDec
   Google Scholar
• McSherry B. Legal capacity under the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. J Law Med. 2012;20:22–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). Concluding observations on the initial report of Australia, adopted by the Committee at its 10th session, 2-13 September 2013: Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 21 October 2013. CRPD/C/AUS/CO/1. 2013. Available from: https://www.refworld.org/docid/5280b5cb4.html
   Google Scholar
• UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Combined second and third periodic reports submitted by Australia under article 35 of the Convention, 7 September 2018. CRPD/C/AUS/2-3. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). Concluding observations on the initial report of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, adopted by the Committee at its 18th session, 14-31 August 2017: Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, 3 October 2017. CRPD/C/GBR/CO/1. 2017. Available from: https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CRPD%2fC%2fGBR%2fCO%2f1&Lang=en
   Google Scholar
• Guardianship and Administration Act 1986. (Vic).
   Google Scholar
• Guardianship and Administration (Further Amendment) Act 2006 (Vic) pt 2 and Guardianship and Administration Act 1986 ss 3, 4(1)(f), 16(1)(ja), 36, 37(6), 40, 41, 42(a), 42A,42(e), 42(g), 42N(6), div 6.
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Law Reform Commission. Guardianship Final Report 24. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Law Reform Commission. Equality, Capacity and Disability in Commonwealth Laws (ALRC Report 124, 2014). Sydney: Australian Law Reform Commission; 2014. p. 324.
   Google Scholar
• uardianship and dministration ct 2019. (Vic).
   Google Scholar
• Australasian Legal Information Institute. Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Guardianship List. n.d. [updated 2018 Aug 21]. Available from: http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinosrch.cgi?method=auto;meta=%2Fau;query=%22guardianship%20list%22;results=20;rank=on;callback=on;mask_path=au%2Fcases%2Fvic%2FVCAT;view=date;submit=Search;sfield=full
   Google Scholar
• Watson J. The right to supported decision-making for people rarely heard [dissertation]. Melbourne: Deakin University; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Wehmeyer ML. Self-determination and individuals with severe disabilities: re-examining meanings and misinterpretations. Res Pract Persons Severe Disabl. 2005;30:113–120.
   Google Scholar
• Knox L, Douglas JM, Bigby C. “I've never been a yes person”: decision-making participation and self-conceptualization after severe traumatic brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39:2250–2260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boréus K, Bergström GML. Analyzing text and discourse: 8 approaches for the social sciences. London (UK): Sage Publications; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas J, Bigby C, Knox L, et al. Factors that underpin the delivery of effective decision-making support for people with cognitive disability. Res Pract Intellect Dev Disabil. 2015;2:37–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal. Korp (Guardianship) [2005] VCAT 779 (28 April 2005). 2005. Available from: https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2005/779.html?context=1;query=%22guardianship%20list%22;mask_path=au/cases/vic/VCAT
   Google Scholar
• Quinn G, Gur A, Watson J. Ageism, moral agency and autonomy: getting beyond guardianship in the 21st century. In: Doron I, Georgantzi N, editors. Ageing, Ageism and the Law. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar Publishing; 2018. p. 50–71.
   Google Scholar
• Attride-Stirling J. Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qual Res. 2001;1:385–405.
   Google Scholar
• Gooding P. Navigating the ‘flashing amber lights’ of the right to legal capacity in the united nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: responding to major concerns. Hum Rights Law Rev. 2015;15:45–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal. YWR (Guardianship) [2016] VCAT 1150 (12 July 2016). 2016. Available from: https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2016/1150.html?context=1;query=%22guardianship%20list%22;mask_path=au/cases/vic/VCAT
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal. YLD (Guardianship) [2016] VCAT 1259 (13 July 2016). 2016. Available from: https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2016/1259.html?context=1;query=%22guardianship%20list%22;mask_path=au/cases/vic/VCAT
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal. NC (Guardianship) [2009] VCAT 2430 (20 November 2009). 2009. Available from: https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2009/2430.html
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal. KK (Guardianship) [2009] VCAT 2219 (29 July 2009). 2009. Available from: https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2009/2219.html?context=1;query=%22guardianship%20list%22;mask_path=au/cases/vic/VCAT
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal. A (Guardianship) [2012] VCAT 1232 (14 August 2012). 2012. Available from: https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2012/1232.html?context=1;query=%22guardianship%20list%22;mask_path=au/cases/vic/VCAT
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal. DKN (Guardianship) [2015] VCAT 958 (12 May 2015). 2015. Available from: https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2015/958.html?context=1;query=%22guardianship%20list%22;mask_path=au/cases/vic/VCAT
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal. Public Advocate v RCS (Guardianship) [2004] VCAT 1880 (27 September 2004). 2004. Available from: https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2004/1880.html?context=1;query=%22guardianship%20list%22;mask_path=au/cases/vic/VCAT
   Google Scholar
• Arstein-Kerslake A, Watson J, Browning M, et al. Future direction in supported decision making. DSQ. 2017;37.
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal. TQ (Guardianship) [2007] VCAT 1300 (24 July 2007). 2007. Available from: https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2007/1300.html?context=1;query=[2007]%20VCAT%201300;mask_path=au/cases/vic/VCAT
   Google Scholar
• Watson J, Voss H, Bloomer MJ. Placing the preferences of people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities at the center of end-of-life decision making through storytelling. Res Pract Persons Severe Disabl. 2019;44:267–279.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas J, Bigby C. Development of an evidence-based practice framework to guide decision making support for people with cognitive impairment due to acquired brain injury or intellectual disability. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42:434–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuscak SJ, Peisah C, Ferguson A. A collaborative approach to supporting communication in the assessment of decision-making capacity. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:1107–1114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson J. The role of speech-language pathology in supporting legal capacity. J Clin Pract Speech Lang Pathol. 2019;21:25–28.
   Google Scholar