1,794
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Dose effects in behavioural treatment of post-stroke aphasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 2548-2559 | Received 14 Jun 2020, Accepted 24 Oct 2020, Published online: 09 Nov 2020

References

  • Mitchell C, Gittins M, Tyson S, et al. Prevalence of aphasia and dysarthria among inpatient stroke survivors: describing the population, therapy provision and outcomes on discharge. Aphasiology. 2020.
  • El Hachioui H, Lingsma HF, van de Sandt-Koenderman MWME, et al. Long-term prognosis of aphasia after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84(3):310–315.
  • Hilari K, Needle JJ, Harrison KL. What are the important factors in health-related quality of life for people with aphasia? A systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(1 Suppl.):S86–S95.
  • Pedersen PM, Vinter K, Olsen TS. Aphasia after stroke: type, severity and prognosis. The Copenhagen aphasia study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;17(1):35–43.
  • Laska AC, Hellblom A, Murray V, et al. Aphasia in acute stroke and relation to outcome. J Intern Med. 2001;249(5):413–422.
  • Ellis C, Simpson AN, Bonilha H, et al. The one-year attributable cost of poststroke aphasia. Stroke. 2012;43(5):1429–1431.
  • Dickey L, Kagan A, Lindsay MP, et al. Incidence and profile of inpatient stroke-induced aphasia in Ontario, Canada. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(2):196–202.
  • Lam JMC, Wodchis WP. The relationship of 60 disease diagnoses and 15 conditions to preference-based health-related quality of life in Ontario hospital-based long-term care residents. Med Care. 2010;48:380–387.
  • Brady MC, Kelly H, Godwin J, et al. Speech and language therapy (SLT) for aphasia after stroke: Cochrane systematic review evidence of therapy regimens, delivery models and theoretical approaches. Eur Stroke J. 2016;1(1):693.
  • Godecke E, Rai T, Ciccone N, et al. Amount of therapy matters in very early aphasia rehabilitation after stroke: a clinical prognostic model. Semin Speech Lang. 2013;34(3):129–141.
  • Palmer R, Dimairo M, Cooper C, et al. Self-managed, computerised speech and language therapy for patients with chronic aphasia post-stroke compared with usual care or attention control (Big CACTUS): a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(9):821–833.
  • Wenke R, Cardell E, Lawrie M, et al. Communication and well-being outcomes of a hybrid service delivery model of intensive impairment-based treatment for aphasia in the hospital setting: a pilot study. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(13):1532–1541.
  • Kong AP-H, Tse CW-K. Clinician survey on speech pathology services for people with aphasia in Hong Kong. Clin Arch Commun Disord. 2018;3(3):201–212.
  • Manning M, Cuskelly C, Russ E, et al. Supporting people with post-stroke aphasia to live well: a cross-sectional survey of speech & language therapists in Ireland. Health Soc Care Community. 2020;27:27.
  • Rose M, Ferguson A, Power E, et al. Aphasia rehabilitation in Australia: current practices, challenges and future directions. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014;16(2):169–180.
  • Bhogal SK, Teasell R, Speechley M. Intensity of aphasia therapy, impact on recovery. Stroke. 2003;34(4):987–993.
  • Robey RR. A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes in the treatment of aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998;41(1):172–187.
  • Baker E. Optimal intervention intensity. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012;14(5):401–409.
  • Harvey SR, Carragher M, Dickey MW, et al. Treatment dose in post-stroke aphasia: a systematic scoping review. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2020. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2020.1786412
  • Warren SF, Fey ME, Yoder PJ. Differential treatment intensity research: a missing link to creating optimally effective communication interventions. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2007;13(1):70–77.
  • Cherney LR. Aphasia treatment: intensity, dose parameters, and script training. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012;14(5):424–431.
  • Turkstra L, Rocio N, Whyte J, et al. Knowing what we're doing: why specification of treatment methods is critical for evidence-based practice in speech-language pathology. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016;25(2):164–171.
  • Bhogal SK, Teasell RW, Foley NC, et al. Rehabilitation of aphasia: more is better. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2003;10(2):66–76.
  • Godecke E, Hird K, Lalor EE, et al. Very early poststroke aphasia therapy: a pilot randomized controlled efficacy trial. Int J Stroke. 2012;7(8):635–644.
  • Denes G, Perazzolo C, Piani A, et al. Intensive versus regular speech therapy in global aphasia: a controlled study. Aphasiology. 1996;10(4):385–394.
  • Carpenter J, Cherney LR. Increasing aphasia treatment intensity in an acute inpatient rehabilitation program: a feasibility study. Aphasiology. 2016;30(5):542–565.
  • Togher L. Challenges inherent in optimizing speech-language pathology outcomes: it's not just about counting the hours. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012;14(5):438–442.
  • Thomas L, Lander L, Cox N, et al. Speech and language therapy for aphasia: parameters and outcomes. Aphasiology. 2020;34(5):603–642.
  • Snell C, Sage K, Ralph MAL. How many words should we provide in anomia therapy? A meta-analysis and a case series study. Aphasiology. 2010;24(9):1064–1094.
  • Gravier ML, Dickey MW, Hula WD, et al. What matters in semantic feature analysis: practice-related predictors of treatment response in aphasia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018;27(1S):438–453.
  • Harnish SM, Morgan J, Lundine JP, et al. Dosing of a cued picture-naming treatment for anomia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014;23(2):S285–S299.
  • Off CA, Griffin JR, Spencer KA, et al. The impact of dose on naming accuracy with persons with aphasia. Aphasiology. 2016;30(9):983–1011.
  • Doogan C, Dignam J, Copland D, et al. Aphasia recovery: when, how and who to treat? Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2018;18(12):90.
  • Dignam J, Copland D, Rawlings A, et al. The relationship between novel word learning and anomia treatment success in adults with chronic aphasia. Neuropsychologia. 2016;81:186–197.
  • Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100.
  • Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, et al. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):210.
  • The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence; 2011. Available from: http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653
  • Tate RL, Rosenkoetter U, Wakim D, et al. The risk-of-bias in N-of-1 trials (RoBiNT) scale: an expanded manual for the critical appraisal of single-case reports. Sydney: Robyn Tate; 2015.
  • Murray E, Power E, Togher L, et al. The reliability of methodological ratings for speechBITE using the PEDro-P scale. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013;48(3):297–306.
  • Parker RI, Vannest KJ, Davis JL, et al. Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behav Ther. 2011;42(2):284–299.
  • Parker RI, Vannest KJ, Davis JL. Effect size in single-case research: a review of nine nonoverlap techniques. Behav Modif. 2011;35(4):303–322.
  • Bakheit AMO, Shaw S, Barrett L, et al. A prospective, randomized, parallel group, controlled study of the effect of intensity of speech and language therapy on early recovery from poststroke aphasia. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21(10):885–894.
  • Breitenstein C, Grewe T, Flöel A, et al. Intensive speech and language therapy in patients with chronic aphasia after stroke: a randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint, controlled trial in a health-care setting. Lancet. 2017;389(10078):1528–1538.
  • DeDe G, Hoover E, Maas E. Two to tango or the more the merrier? A randomized controlled trial of the effects of group size in aphasia conversation treatment on standardized tests. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019;62(5):1437–1451.
  • Stahl B, Mohr B, Büscher V, et al. Efficacy of intensive aphasia therapy in patients with chronic stroke: a randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018;89(6):586–592.
  • Marshall J, Booth T, Devane N, et al. Evaluating the benefits of aphasia intervention delivered in virtual reality: results of a quasi-randomised study. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e0160381.
  • Mozeiko J, Myers EB, Coelho CA. Treatment response to a double administration of constraint-induced language therapy in chronic aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018;61(7):1664–1690.
  • Duncan ES, Small SL. Imitation-based aphasia therapy increases narrative content: a case series. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(11):1500–1507.
  • Lee JB, Kaye RC, Cherney LR. Conversational script performance in adults with non-fluent aphasia: treatment intensity and aphasia severity. Aphasiology. 2009;23(7–8):885–897.
  • Herbert R, Webster D, Dyson L. Effects of syntactic cueing therapy on picture naming and connected speech in acquired aphasia. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2012;22(4):609–633.
  • Marshall J, Roper A, Galliers J, et al. Computer delivery of gesture therapy for people with severe aphasia. Aphasiology. 2013;27(9):1128–1146.
  • Schuchard J, Rawson KA, Middleton EL. Effects of distributed practice and criterion level on word retrieval in aphasia. Cognition. 2020;198:104216.
  • PEDro Statistics; 2016; [cited 2020 Feb 12]. Available from: http://www.pedro.org.au/english/downloads/pedro-statistics/
  • Pierce JE, Menahemi-Falkov M, O'Halloran R, et al. Constraint and multimodal approaches to therapy for chronic aphasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2019;29(7):1005–1041.
  • Beeson PM, Robey RR. Evaluating single-subject treatment research: lessons learned from the aphasia literature. Neuropsychol Rev. 2006;16(4):161–169.
  • Dalton E, Churilov L, Lannin NA, et al. Dose articulation in preclinical and clinical stroke recovery: refining a discovery research pipeline and presenting a scoping review protocol. Front Neurol. 2019;10:1148.
  • Aerts A, Batens K, Santens P, et al. Aphasia therapy early after stroke: behavioural and neurophysiological changes in the acute and post-acute phases. Aphasiology. 2015;29(7):845–871.
  • Nardo D, Holland R, Leff AP, et al. Less is more: neural mechanisms underlying anomia treatment in chronic aphasic patients. Brain. 2017;140(11):3039–3054.
  • Varley R. Rethinking aphasia therapy: a neuroscience perspective. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011;13(1):11–20.
  • Dignam JK, Rodriguez AD, Copland DA. Evidence for intensive aphasia therapy: consideration of theories from neuroscience and cognitive psychology. Pm R. 2016;8(3):254–267.
  • Nouwens F, de Lau LML, Visch-Brink EG, et al. Early cognitive-linguistic treatment for aphasia due to stroke: a randomised controlled trial (rats-3). Eur Stroke J. 2017;2(2):126–136.
  • Kiran S, Thompson CK. Neuroplasticity of language networks in aphasia: advances, updates, and future challenges. Front Neurol. 2019;10:295.
  • Brownsett SLE, Warren JE, Geranmayeh F, et al. Cognitive control and its impact on recovery from aphasic stroke. Brain. 2014;137(Pt 1):242–254.
  • Harnish SM, Lundine JP. Nonverbal working memory as a predictor of anomia treatment success. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;24(4):S880–S894.
  • Simic T, Rochon E, Greco E, et al. Baseline executive control ability and its relationship to language therapy improvements in post-stroke aphasia: a systematic review. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2019;29(3):395–439.
  • Pulvermuller F, Neininger B, Elbert T, et al. Constraint-induced therapy of chronic aphasia after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32(7):1621–1626.
  • Meinzer M, Djundja D, Barthel G, et al. Long-term stability of improved language functions in chronic aphasia after constraint-induced aphasia therapy. Stroke. 2005;36(7):1462–1466.
  • Evans WS, Hula WD, Quique Y, et al. How much time do people with aphasia need to respond during picture naming? Estimating optimal response time cutoffs using a multinomial ex-Gaussian approach. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020;63(2):599–614.
  • Lee JB, Cherney LR. Tau-U: a quantitative approach for analysis of single-case experimental data in aphasia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018;27(1S):495–503.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.