Are hip movement precautions effective in preventing prosthesis dislocation post hip arthroplasty using a posterior surgical approach? A systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• Bozic KJ, Kamath AF, Ong K, et al. Comparative epidemiology of revision arthroplasty: failed THA poses greater clinical and economic burdens than failed TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(6):2131–2138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsikandylakis G, Mohaddes M, Cnudde P, et al. Head size in primary total hip arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev. 2018;3(5):225–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Xiao H, Xue F. Causes of and treatment options for dislocation following total hip arthroplasty. Exp Ther Med. 2019;18(3):1715–1722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Hip, Knee & Shoulder Arthroplasty: 2019 Annual Report. Adelaide: AOA; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakopoulos G, Poultsides L, Christofilopoulos P. Total hip arthroplasty through an anterior approach: the pros and cons. EFORT Open Rev. 2018;3(11):574–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheth D, Cafri G, Inacio MC, et al. Anterior and anterolateral approaches for THA are associated with lower dislocation risk without higher revision risk. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:3401–3408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kärrholm J, Lindahl H, Malchau H, et al. The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register Annual Report 2016. Gothenburg: Registercentrum Västra Götaland; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Carli AV, Poitras S, Clohisy JC, et al. Variation in use of postoperative precautions and equipment following total hip arthroplasty: a survey of the AAHKS and CAS membership. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:3201–3205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond A, Coole C, Brewin C, et al. Hip precautions following primary total hip replacement: a national survey of current occupational therapy practice. Br J Occup Ther. 2012;75(4):164–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith TO, Sackley CM. UK survey of occupational therapist’s and physiotherapist’s experiences and attitudes towards hip replacement precautions and equipment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadzadi M, Pedersen D, Yack H, et al. Kinematics, kinetics, and finite element analysis of commonplace maneuvers at risk for total hip dislocation. J Biomech. 2003;36:577–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee G, Berstock J, Whitehouse M, et al. Recall and patient perceptions of hip precautions 6 weeks after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2017;88(5):496–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnsley L, Barnsley L, Page R. Are hip precautions necessary post total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2015;6(3):230–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Weegen W, Kornuijt A, Das D. Do lifestyle restrictions and precautions prevent dislocation after total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30(4):329–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith T, Jepson P, Beswick A, et al. Assistive devices, hip precautions, environmental modifications and training to prevent dislocation and improve function after hip arthroplasty. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(7):CD010815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crompton J, Osagie-Clouard L, Patel A. Do hip precautions after posterior-approach total hip arthroplasty affect dislocation rates? A systematic review of 7 studies with 6900 patients. Acta Orthopaedica 2020;91:1745–3682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan R, Fick D, Khoo P, et al. Less invasive total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(7):1038–1046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikkelsen LR, Mechlenburg I, Soballe K. Does reduced movement restrictions and use of assistive devices affect rehabilitation outcome after total hip replacement? A non-randomised controlled study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2014;50:383–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornuijt A, Das D, Sijbesma T, et al. The rate of dislocation is not increased when minimal precautions are used after total hip arthroplasty using the posterolateral approach: a prospective, comparative safety study. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B:589–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Weegen W, Kornuijt A, Das D, et al. It is safe to use minimal restrictions following posterior approach total hip arthroplasty: results from a large cohort study. HIP International. 2019;29(6):572–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gromov K, Troelsen A, Otte K, et al. Removal of restrictions following primary THA with posterolateral approach does not increase the risk of early dislocation. Acta Orthop. 2015;86(4):463–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen F, Skinner D, Harrison J, et al. The effect of precuations on early dislocations post-total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study. Hip Int. 2018;28(5):485–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters A, ter Weele K, Manning F, et al. Huis in het Veld, R. less postoperative restrictions following total hip arthroplasty with use of a posterolateral approach: a prospective, randomized, noninferiority trial. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34:2415–2419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz MJ, Klein AE, Lindsey BA, et al. Posterior hip precautions do not impact early recover in total hip arthroplasty: a multicenter, randomized, controlled study. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34:S221–S227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097–e100097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis J, Koch G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann T, Glasziou P, Boutron I, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs S, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52:377–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speed L, Harding K. Tracheostomy teams reduce total tracheostomy time and increase speaking valve use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Crit Care. 2013;28(2):216e1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samoocha D, Bruinvels D, Elbers N, et al. Effectiveness of web-based interventions on patient empowerment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12:e23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Higgins J, Thompson S, Deeks J, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328:1490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: a review. J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1962;65:145–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen CC, Kjaersgaard-Andersen P, Solgaard S, et al. Hip dislocations after 2734 elective unilateral fast-track total hip arthroplasties: incidence, circumstances and predisposing factors. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134:1615–1622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetreault M, Akram F, Li J, et al. Are postoperative hip precautions necessary after primary total hip arthroplasty using a posterior approach? Preliminary results of a prospective randomised trial. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35:S246–S251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown M, Ezzet K. Relaxed hip precautions do not increase early dislocation rate following total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;28(10):e440–e447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikutomo H, Nagai K, Nakagawa N, et al. Falls in patients after total hip arthroplasty in Japan. J Orthrop Sci. 2015;20:663–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haines TP, Hill A, Hill KD, et al. Patient education to prevent falls among older hospital inpatients: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(6):516–524.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peak EL, Parvizi J, Ciminiello M, et al. The role of patient restrictions in reducing the prevalence of early dislocation following total hip arthroplasty. A randomised, prospective study. J Bone Joint Sur America. 2005;87(2):247–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunutsor S, Barrett M, Beswick A, et al. Risk factors for dislocation after primary total hip replacement: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of 125 studies involving approximately five million hip replacements. Lancet Rheumatol. 2019;1(2):e111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoon R, Mahure, SA, Hutzler LH, et al. Hip arthroplasty for fracture vs elective care: one bundle does not fit all. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(8):2353–2358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar