What do people respond to when rating executive function? – a cognitive interviewing investigation of BRIEF-A informant ratings in severe aphasia

References

• Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Bigler ED, et al. Executive functions. In: Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Bigler ED, et al. editors. Neuropsychological assessment. 5th ed. New York (NY): Oxford university press; 2012. p. 666–711.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman NP, Miyake A. Unity and diversity of executive functions: individual differences as a window on cognitive structure. Cortex. 2017;86:186–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchy Y. Executive functioning: a comprehensive guide for clinical practice. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher R, Halai AD, Lambon Ralph MA. Assessing and mapping language, attention and executive multidimensional deficits in stroke aphasia. Brain. 2019;142:3202–3215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantinidou F, Wertheimer JC, Tsanadis J, et al. Assessment of executive functioning in brain injury: collaboration between speech-language pathology and neuropsychology for an integrative neuropsychological perspective. Brain Inj. 2012;26:1549–1563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess PW, Stuss DT. Fifty years of prefrontal cortex research: impact on assessment. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017;23:755–767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchy Y, Ziemnik RE, Niermeyer MA. Assessment of executive functions in clinical settings. In: Goldberg E, editor. Executive functions in health and disease. San Diego(CA): Elsevier Science & Technology; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Leśniak M, Bak T, Czepiel W, et al. Frequency and prognostic value of cognitive disorders in stroke patients. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2008;26:356–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea-Shumsky NB, Schoeneberger S, Grigsby J. Executive functioning as a predictor of stroke rehabilitation outcomes. Clinical Neuropsychol. 2019;33:854–872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis MW, Babbage DR, Leathem JM. Assessing executive performance during cognitive rehabilitation. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2011;21:145–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipskaya-Velikovsky L, Zeilig G, Weingarden H, et al. Executive functioning and daily living of individuals with chronic stroke: measurement and implications. Int J Rehabil Res. 2018;41:122–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papathanasiou I, Coppens P. Aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders. 2nd ed. Burlington (MA): Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ardila A, Rosselli M. Cognitive rehabilitation of acquired calculation disturbances. Behav Neurol. 2019;2019:3151092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basso A, Caporali A, Faglioni P. Spontaneous recovery from acalculia. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2005;11:99–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas M, Hunsaker E, Guarino AJ. The relation between language, non-verbal cognition and quality of life in people with aphasia. Aphasiology. 2017;31:688–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simic T, Rochon E, Greco E, et al. Baseline executive control ability and its relationship to language therapy improvements in post-stroke aphasia: a systematic review. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2019;29:395–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson C, Arvidsson P, Blom Johansson M. Relations between executive function, language, and functional communication in severe aphasia. Aphasiology. 2019;33:821–845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridriksson J, Nettles C, Davis M, et al. Functional communication and executive function in aphasia. Clin Linguist Phon. 2006;20:401–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light J, McNaughton D. Communicative competence for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: a new definition for a new era of communication? Augment Altern Commun. 2014;30:1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchy Y, Niermeyer MA, Ziemnik RE. Assessment of executive functions in research. In: Goldberg E, editor. Executive functions in health and disease. San Diego (CA): Elsevier Science & Technology; 2017. p. 197–216.
   Google Scholar
• Egeland J, Løvstad M, Norup A, et al. Questionnaire use among Nordic neuropsychologists: shift from assessing personality to checking ecological validity of neuropsychological assessments? Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2017;48:227–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egeland J, Lovstad M, Norup A, et al. Following international trends while subject to past traditions: neuropsychological test use in the Nordic countries. Clin Neuropsychol. 2016;30:1479–1500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toplak ME, West RF, Stanovich KE. Practitioner review: do performance-based measures and ratings of executive function assess the same construct?. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013;54:131–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil K, Kaszniak AW. Examining executive function in individuals with brain injury: a review. Aphasiology. 2002;16:305–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovstad M, Funderud I, Endestad T, et al. Executive functions after orbital or lateral prefrontal lesions: neuropsychological profiles and self-reported executive functions in everyday living. Brain Inj. 2012;26:1586–1598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich KE. What intelligence tests miss: the psychology of rational thought. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Roussel M, Martinaud O, Henon H, et al.; GREFEX Study Group. The behavioral and cognitive executive disorders of stroke: the GREFEX Study. PloS One. 2016;11:e0147602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth R, Isquith P, Gioia G. Behavior rating inventory of executive function - adult version. Lutz (FL): Psychological Assessment Resources; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Oczkowski C, O'Donnell M. Reliability of proxy respondents for patients with stroke: a systematic review. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010;19:410–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilari K, Owen S, Farrelly SJ. Proxy and self-report agreement on the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78:1072–1075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilari K, Cruice M, Sorin-Peters R, et al. Quality of life in aphasia: state of the art. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2015;67:114–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson C, Arvidsson P, Blom Johansson M. Measuring executive function in people with severe aphasia: comparing neuropsychological tests and informant ratings. NeuroRehabilitation. 2020;46:299–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright J, Moghaddam N, Dawson DL. Cognitive interviewing in patient-reported outcome measures: a systematic review of methodological processes. Qual Psychol. 2019.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller K, Chepp V, Padilla JL, et al. Cognitive interviewing methodology. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Boeije H, Willis G. The Cognitive Interviewing Reporting Framework (CIRF): towards the harmonization of cognitive testing reports. Methodology. 2013;9:87–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourangeau R, et al. Cognitive science in survey methods. In: Jabine T, Straf ML, Tanur JM, editors. Cognitive aspects of survey design: building a bridge between disciplines. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 1984. p. 73–100.
   Google Scholar
• Hill NL, Mogle J, Whitaker EB, et al. Sources of response bias in cognitive self-report items: “which memory are you talking about?” Gerontologist. 2018;59:912–924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis G. Analysis of the cognitive interview in questionnaire design. New York (NY): Oxford university press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Ridolfo H, Schoua-Glusberg A. Analyzing cognitive interview data using the constant comparative method of analysis to understand cross-cultural patterns in survey data. Field Methods. 2011;23:420–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chepp V, Gray C, et al. Foundations and new directions. In: Miller K, Willson S, Chepp V, editors. Cognitive interviewing methodology. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2014. p. 7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad FG, Blair J. Sources of error in cognitive interviews. Public Opin Q. 2009;73:32–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis G. Cognitive interviewing: a tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Miller K, Willson S, Chepp V, et al. Analysis. In: Miller K, Willson S, Chepp V, et al. editors. Cognitive interviewing methodology. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2014. p. 35–50.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, et al. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant. 2018;52:1893–1907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziemnik RE, Suchy Y. Ecological validity of performance-based measures of executive functions: is face validity necessary for prediction of daily functioning? Psychol Assess. 2019;31:1307–1318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchy Y. Executive functioning: overview, assessment, and research issues for non-neuropsychologists. Ann Behav Med. 2009;37:106–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byeon H, Koh HW. Health science students' perceptions of motor and sensory aphasia caused by stroke. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28:1772–1774.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allard ER, Williams DF. Listeners' perceptions of speech and language disorders. J Commun Disord. 2008;41:108–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan A. Supported conversation for adults with aphasia: methods and resources for training conversation partners. Aphasiology. 1998;12:816–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar