Expert consensus and perspectives on recovery following road traffic crashes: a Delphi study

References

• Motor Accident Insurance Commission. Motor Accident Insurance Commission - Annual report 2018-19. MAIC Publ. [Internet]. 2017. Available from: https://maic.qld.gov.au/publications/annual-report-2016-17/
   Google Scholar
• Samoborec S, Ruseckaite R, Ayton D, et al. Biopsychosocial factors associated with non-recovery after a minor transport-related injury: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0198352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen TBW, Fink P, Oernboel E, et al. Sick leave within 5 years of whiplash trauma predicts recovery: a prospective cohort and register-based study. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0130298–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton D. A review of the definitions of “'recovery' used in prognostic studies on whiplash using an ICF framework”. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(12):943–957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rissanen R, Berg HY, Hasselberg M. Quality of life following road traffic injury: a systematic literature review. Accid Anal Prev. 2017;108:308–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alharbi R, Mosley I, Miller C, et al. Factors associated with physical, psychological and functional outcomes in adult trauma patients following Road Traffic Crash: a scoping literature review. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2019;3: 100061.
   Google Scholar
• Dictionary of Medical Terms. 4th ed. 2004. London: A&C Black Publishers Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Motor Accident Insurance Commission. MAIC guideline for compulsory third party (CTP) - Revised and updated 2012 [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2019 Jan 29]. p. 26. Available from: https://maic.qld.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/MAIC_Guidelines_for_CTP_Rehabilitation_Providers_2013_Nov_26.pdf
   Google Scholar
• MAIC. How to settle your claim [Internet]. [cited 18 Sep 2019]. Available from: https://maic.qld.gov.au/how-to-settle-your-claim/
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: ICF; 2001. 
   Google Scholar
• Raja SN, Carr DB, Cohen M, et al. The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain. Pain. 2020;161(9):1976–1982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopinath B, Jagnoor J, Kifley A, et al. Predictors of health-related quality of life after non-catastrophic injury sustained in a road traffic crash. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2020;63(4):280–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie C, Hendrikz J, Kenardy J, et al. Derivation of a clinical prediction rule to identify both chronic moderate/severe disability and full recovery following whiplash injury. Pain. 2013;154:2198–2206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits E, Brakenridge C, Gane E, et al. Identifying risk of poor physical and mental health recovery following a road traffic crash: an industry-specific screening tool. Accid Anal Prev. 2019;132:105280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linton SJ, Boersma K. Early identification of patients at risk of developing a persistent back problem: the predictive validity of The Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire. Clin J Pain. 2003;19:80–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill JC, Dunn KM, Lewis M, et al. A primary care back pain screening tool: identifying patient subgroups for initial treatment. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(5):632–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu C, Sandford BA. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assessment Res Eval. 2007;12:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kenardy J, Heron-Delaney M, Hendrikz J, et al. Recovery trajectories for long-term health-related quality of life following a road traffic crash injury: results from the UQ SuPPORT study. J Affect Disord. 2017;214:8–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippolini MA, Young AE, Pransky G, et al. Beyond symptom resolution: insurance case manager’s perspective on predicting recovery after motor vehicle crash. Disabil Rehabil. 2019. DOI:10.1080/09638288.2019.1630857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samoborec S, Ayton D, Ruseckaite R, et al. Biopsychosocial barriers affecting recovery after a minor transport-related injury: a qualitative study from Victoria. Health Expect. 2019;22(5):1003–1012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MAIC. Reasonable and Appropriate Rehabilitation Guidance for CTP Insurers. 2020. Available from: https://maic.qld.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Rehab-decision-making-tool-updated-1-Feb-2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• MAIC. Motor Accident Insurance Act 1994. 2019. Available from: https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/view/html/inforce/current/act-1994-009#sec.4
   Google Scholar
• Brody H, Miller FG. The clinician-investigator: unavoidable but manageable tension. Kennedy Inst. Ethics J. 2003;13:329–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS, Joffe S, et al. Competing commitments in clinical trials. IRB Ethics Hum Res. 2009;31:1–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hay-Smith EJC, Brown M, Anderson L, et al. Once a clinician, always a clinician: a systematic review to develop a typology of clinician-researcher dual-role experiences in health research with patient-participants. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16:1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortsov AV, Platts-Mills TF, Peak DA, et al. Effect of pain location and duration on life function in the year after motor vehicle collision. Pain. 2014;155:1836–1845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostick GP, Carroll LJ, Brown CA, et al. Predictive capacity of pain beliefs and catastrophizing in Whiplash Associated Disorder. Injury. 2013;44(11):1465–1471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buitenhuis J, De Jong PJ, Jaspers JPC, et al. Catastrophizing and causal beliefs in whiplash. Spine (Phila. Pa. 1976). 2008;33:2427–2433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll LJ, Liu Y, Holm LW, et al. Pain-related emotions in early stages of recovery in whiplash-associated disorders: their presence, intensity, and association with pain recovery. Psychosom Med. 2011;73(8):708–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen TBW, Frostholm L, Oernboel E, et al. Post-trauma ratings of pre-collision pain and psychological distress predict poor outcome following acute whiplash trauma: a 12-month follow-up study. Pain. 2008;139:248–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey PP, Feyer AM, Cameron ID. Identifying predictors of early non-recovery in a compensation setting: the Whiplash Outcome Study. Injury. 2011;42(1):25–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopinath B, Harris IA, Nicholas M, et al. A comparison of health outcomes in older versus younger adults following a road traffic crash injury: a cohort study. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0122732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopinath B, Jagnoor J, Nicholas M, et al. Presence and predictors of persistent pain among persons who sustained an injury in a road traffic crash. EJP. 2015;19(8):1111–1118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myrtveit SM, Carstensen T, Kasch H, et al. Initial healthcare and coping preferences are associated with outcome 1 year after whiplash trauma: a multicentre 1-year follow-up study. BMJ Open. 2015;5(3):e007239–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijs J, Inghelbrecht E, Daenen L, et al. Long-term functioning following whiplash injury: the role of social support and personality traits. Clin Rheumatol. 2011;30(7):927–935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littleton SM, Cameron ID, Poustie SJ, et al. The association of compensation on longer term health status for people with musculoskeletal injuries following road traffic crashes: emergency department inception cohort study. Injury. 2011;42(9):927–933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littleton SM, Hughes DC, Poustie SJ, et al. The influence of fault on health in the immediate post-crash period following road traffic crashes. Injury. 2012;43(9):1586–1592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner F, Lienhardt SB, Kissling RO, et al. Diagnostic criteria and follow-up parameters in complex regional pain syndrome type I-a Delphi survey. Eur J Pain. 2008;12(1):48–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters SE, Johnston V, Ross M, et al. Expert consensus on facilitators and barriers to return-to-work following surgery for non-traumatic upper extremity conditions: a Delphi study. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2017;42(2):127–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street TD, Lacey SJ. A systematic review of studies identifying predictors of poor return to work outcomes following workplace injury. Work. 2015;51(2):373–381.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Young AE, Viikari-Juntura E, Boot CRL, Hopkinton Conference Working Group on Workplace Disability Prevention, et al. Workplace outcomes in work-disability prevention research: a review with recommendations for future research. J Occup Rehabil. 2016;26(4):434–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLinton S, McLinton SS, van der Linden M. Psychosocial factors impacting workplace injury rehabilitation: evaluation of a concise screening tool. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(1):121–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie C, Ehrlich C, Sterling M. Living with ongoing whiplash associated disorders: a qualitative study of individual perceptions and experiences. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbers NA, Akkermans AJ, Lockwood K, et al. Factors that challenge health for people involved in the compensation process following a motor vehicle crash: a longitudinal study Health behavior, health promotion and society. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murgatroyd D, Lockwood K, Garth B, et al. The perceptions and experiences of people injured in motor vehicle crashes in a compensation scheme setting: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay GM, Mior SA, Côté P, et al. Patients' experiences with vehicle collision to inform the development of clinical practice guidelines: a narrative inquiry. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016;39(3):218–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie C, Hendrikz J, Jull G, et al. External validation of a clinical prediction rule to predict full recovery and ongoing moderate/severe disability following acute whiplash injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015;45(4):242–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iles R, Sheehan L, Munk K, et al. Development and pilot assessment of the PACE Tool: helping case managers identify and respond to risk factors in workers’ compensation case management. J Occup Rehabil. 2020;30(2):167–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw WS, Reme SE, Pransky G, et al. The pain recovery inventory of concerns and expectations: a psychosocial screening instrument to identify intervention needs among patients at elevated risk of back disability. J Occup Environ Med. 2013;55(8):885–894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin A, Jagnoor J, Arora M, et al. Evidence-based care in high- and low-risk groups following whiplash injury: a multi-centre inception cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin I, Wiles L, Waller R, et al. What does best practice care for musculoskeletal pain look like? Eleven consistent recommendations from high-quality clinical practice guidelines: systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(2):79–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen H, Rebbeck T, Kifley A, et al. Positive recovery for low-risk injuries screened by the short form-Örebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire following road traffic injury: Evidence from an inception cohort study in New South Wales, Australia. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2019;20:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Abbreviated Injury Scale [Internet]. [cited 2018 Dec 5]. Available from: https://www.aaam.org/abbreviated-injury-scale-ais/
   Google Scholar
• Peters SE, Truong AP, Johnston V. Stakeholders identify similar barriers but different strategies to facilitate return-to-work: a vignette of a worker with an upper extremity condition. Work. 2018;59(3):401–412.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar