What are the factors that may influence the implementation of self-managed computer therapy for people with long term aphasia following stroke? A qualitative study of speech and language therapists’ experiences in the Big CACTUS trial

References

• Rosenbek JC, Lapoint LL, Wertz RT. Aphasia: a clinical approach. Boston (MA): Little, Brown & Co; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Engelter ST, Gostynski M, Papa S, et al. Epidemiology of aphasia attributable to first ischemic stroke: incidence, severity, fluency, etiology, and thrombolysis. Stroke. 2006;37(6):1379–1384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertesz A, McCabe P. Recovery patterns and prognosis in aphasia. Brain. 1977;100(1):1–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allen L, Mehta S, Andrew McClure J, et al. Therapeutic interventions for aphasia initiated more than six months post stroke: a review of the evidence. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012;19(6):523–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady MC, Kelly H, Godwin J, et al. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(6):CD000425.
   Google Scholar
• Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National clinical guideline for stroke. 5th ed. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2016. Available from: https://www.strokeaudit.org/SupportFiles/Documents/Guidelines/2016-National-Clinical-Guideline-for-Stroke-5t-(1).aspx
   Google Scholar
• Code C, Petheram B. Delivering for aphasia. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011;13(1):3–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer R, Witts H, Chater T. What speech and language therapy do community dwelling stroke survivors with aphasia receive in the UK? PloS One. 2018;13(7):e0200096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie N, Worrall L, Murray LL, et al. The top ten: best practice recommendations for aphasia. Aphasiology. 2017;31(2):131–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng C, Lynch L, Taylor N. Effect of computer therapy in aphasia: a systematic review. Aphasiology. 2016;30(2–3):211–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer R, Cooper C, Enderby P, et al. Clinical and cost effectiveness of computer treatment for aphasia post stroke (Big CACTUS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2015;16(1):18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palmer R, Dimairo M, Cooper C, et al. Self-managed, computerised speech and language therapy for patients with chronic aphasia post-stroke compared with usual care or attention control (Big CACTUS): a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(9):821–833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Papoutsi C, et al. Beyond adoption: a new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(11):e367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006;26(1):13–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CC, Bode RK. Factors influencing therapists' decision-making in the acceptance of new technology devices in stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;90(5):415–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H, Sefcik JS, Bradway C. Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: A systematic review. Res Nurs Health. 2017;40(1):23–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan EA, Nicol MM. Subtle realism and occupational therapy: An alternative approach to knowledge generation and evaluation. Br J of Occup Ther. 2004;67(10):453–456.
   Google Scholar
• Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4(1):50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olswang LB, Prelock PA. Bridging the gap between research and practice: implementation science. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015;58(6):S1818–S1826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas NF. Organizational context associated with time spent evaluating language and cognitive-communicative impairments in skilled nursing facilities: survey results within an implementation science framework. J Commun Disord. 2016;60:1–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham ID, Tetroe J. Some theoretical underpinnings of knowledge translation. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14(11):936–941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner DW. III Qualitative interview design: a practical guide for novice investigators. Qual Rep. 2010;15(3):754.
   Google Scholar
• Shenton AK. Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. EFI. 2004;22(2):63–75.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• QSR International. NVIVO 11. Australia: QSR Pty. Ltd; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Tobin GA, Begley CM. Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. J Adv Nurs. 2004;48(4):388–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, et al. Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16(1):1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer R, Enderby P, Paterson G. Using computers to enable self-management of aphasia therapy exercises for word finding: the patient and carer perspective . Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013;48(5):508–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best W, Greenwood A, Grassly J, et al. Aphasia rehabilitation: Does generalisation from anomia therapy occur and is it predictable? A case series study. Cortex. 2013;49(9):2345–2357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renvall K, Nickels L, Davidson B. Functionally relevant items in the treatment of aphasia (part I): challenges for current practice. Aphasiology. 2013;27(6):636–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park S, O'Brien MA, Caine KE, et al. Acceptance of computer technology: Understanding the user and the organizational characteristics. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2006;50(15):1478–1482.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer R, Hughes H, Chater T. What do people with aphasia want to be able to say? A content analysis of words identified as personally relevant by people with aphasia. PloS One. 2017;12(3):e0174065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayliss EA, Bosworth HB, Noel PH, et al. Supporting self-management for patients with complex medical needs: recommendations of a working group. Chronic Illn. 2007;3(2):167–175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skoglund AG. Do not forget about your volunteers: A qualitative analysis of factors influencing volunteer turnover. Health Soc Work. 2006;31(3):217–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer R, Dimairo M, Latimer N, et al. Computerised speech and language therapy or attention control added to usual care for people with long-term post-stroke aphasia: the Big CACTUS three-arm RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2020;24(19):1–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latimer NR, Bhadhuri A, Alshreef AO, et al. Self-managed, computerised word finding therapy as an add-on to usual care for chronic aphasia post-stroke: An economic evaluation. Clin Rehabil. 2020. DOI:10.1177/0269215520975348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyber security in the NHS. [Internet]. London (England): Information Age; 2017. March 1 [cited 2020 Jan 30]. Available from: http://www.information-age.com/cyber-security-nhs-123464777/
   Google Scholar
• Guidance on protecting medical devices. [Internet]. London (England): NHS Digital; 2019. Oct 8 [cited 2020 Jan 30]. Available from: https://digital.nhs.uk/services/data-and-cyber-security-protecting-information-and-data-in-health-and-care/cyber-and-data-security-policy-and-good-practice-in-health-and-care/protecting-medical-devices
   Google Scholar