521
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

Lymphedema quality of life questionnaire (LYMQOL): cross-cultural adaptation and validation in Italian women with upper limb lymphedema after breast cancer

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 4075-4080 | Received 23 Jul 2020, Accepted 11 Feb 2021, Published online: 02 Mar 2021

References

  • Moffatt CJ, Franks PJ, Doherty DC, et al. Lymphoedema: an underestimated health problem. QJM. 2003;96(10):731–738.
  • Mortimer PS. Swollen lower limb-2: lymphoedema. BMJ. 2000;320(7248):1527–1529.
  • Keast DH, Despatis M, Allen JO, et al. Chronic oedema/lymphoedema: under-recognised and under-treated. Int Wound J. 2015;12(3):328–333.
  • Keast DH, Moffatt C, Janmohammad A. Lymphedema impact and prevalence international study: the Canadian data. Lymphat Res Biol. 2019;17(2):178–186.
  • Furmaniak AC, Menig M, Markes MH. Exercise for women receiving adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;9(9):CD005001
  • Rockson SG, Rivera KK. Estimating the population burden of lymphedema. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1131:147–154.
  • Piller N, Carati C. The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema. Lymphology. 2009;42(3):146–147.
  • Jager G, Doller W, Roth R. Quality-of-life and body image impairments in patients with lymphedema. Lymphology. 2006;39(4):193–200.
  • Keeley VL, Veigas D, Crooks S, et al. The development of a condition-specific quality of life measure for lymphoedema (LYMQOL). Eur J Lymphol. 2004;12(41):36.
  • Keeley V, Crooks S, Locke J, et al. A quality of life measure for limb lymphoedema (LYMQOL. ). J Lymphoedema. 2010;5:26–37.
  • Sierla R, Dylke ES, Kilbreath S. A systematic review of the outcomes used to assess upper body lymphedema. Cancer Invest. 2018;36(8):458–473.
  • Coriddi M, Dayan J, Sobti N, et al. Systematic review of patient-reported outcomes following surgical treatment of lymphedema. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(3):565.
  • Mercier G, Pastor J, Moffatt C, et aI. LIMPRINT: health-related quality of life in adult patients with chronic edema. Lymphat Res Biol. 2019;17(2):163–167.
  • Davies C, Ryans K, Levenhagen K, et al. Quality of life and functional outcome measures for secondary lymphedema in breast cancer survivors. Rehabil Oncol. 2014;32:7–12.
  • Blair BC, Dellino GM, Thomas JE. A review of health related quality of life assessments for patients with lymphedema. School of Occupational Master's Capstone Projects. 2017;23. Available from: https://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1013&context=ot_capstone
  • Cornelissen AJM, Kool M, Keuter XHA, et al. Quality of life questionnaires in breast cancer-related lymphedema patients: review of the literature. Lymphat Res Biol. 2018;16(2):134–139.
  • Bakar Y, Tugral A, Ozdemir O, et al. Translation and validation of the Turkish version of Lymphedema Quality of Life Tool (LYMQOL) in patients with breast cancer related lymphedema. Eur J Breast Health. 2017;13(3):123–128.
  • Borman P, Yaman A, Denizli M, et al. The reliability and validity of Lymphedema Quality of Life Questionnaire-Arm in Turkish patients with upper limb lymphedema related with breast cancer. Turk J Phys Med Rehab. 2018;64(3):205–212.
  • Wedin M, Fredrikson M, Ahlner E, et al. Validation of the Lymphoedema Quality of Life Questionnaire (LYMQOL) in Swedish cancer patients. Acta Oncol. 2020;59(3):365–371.
  • Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)). 2000;25(24):3186–3191.
  • Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8(2):94–104.
  • Farrar JT, Young JP, Jr, LaMoreaux L, et al. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001;94(2):149–158.
  • Apolone G, Mosconi P. The Italian SF-36 Health Survey: translation, validation and norming. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):1025–1036.
  • Apolone G, Mosconi P, Ware J. Questionario sullo stato di salute SF-36. Manuale d'uso e guida all'interpretazione dei risultati. [SF-36 quality of life questionnaire. User’s Manual and guide to the interpretation of results]. Milano: Guerini; 2000.
  • Jackson DL, Voth J, Frey MP. A note on sample size and solution propriety for confirmatory factor analytic models. Struct Equ Modeling. 2013;20(1):86–97.
  • Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall; 2015.
  • Bonett D. Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Stat Med. 2002;21(9):1331–1335.
  • Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.
  • Kline R. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 3rd Ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2010.
  • Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociol Methods Res. 1992;21(2):230–258.
  • Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen M. Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Bus Res Methods. 2008;6(1):53–60.
  • EORTC Quality of Life. © EORTC, 2020. Available from: https://qol.eortc.org/form/#1.
  • Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Psychol Res Online. 2003;8:23–72.
  • Hu L, Bentler PM. Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. 1999;6(1):1–55.
  • van de Pas CB, Biemans AAM, Boonen RSM, et al. Validation of the Lymphoedema Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (LYMQOL) in Dutch patients diagnosed with lymphoedema of the lower limbs. Phlebology. 2016;31(4):257–263.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.