1,092
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

A comparison of test-retest reliability of four cognitive screening tools in people with dementia

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 4090-4095 | Received 20 Aug 2020, Accepted 13 Feb 2021, Published online: 09 Mar 2021

References

  • Chiu EC, Yip PK, Woo P, et al. Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument in patients with dementia. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0216450.
  • Howland M, Tatsuoka C, Smyth KA, et al. Detecting change over time: a comparison of the SLUMS examination and the MMSE in older adults at risk for cognitive decline. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2016;22(5):413–419.
  • Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–198.
  • Pfeiffer EA. A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1975;23(10):433–441.
  • Rademeyer M, Joubert P. A comparison between the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test in schizophrenia. S Afr J Psychiatr. 2016;22(1):890–890.
  • Werner P, Heinik J, Mendel A, et al. Examining the reliability and validity of the Hebrew version of the Mini Mental State Examination. Aging. 1999;11(5):329–334.
  • Cao L, Hai S, Lin X, et al. Comparison of the Saint Louis University Mental Status Examination, the Mini-Mental State Examination, and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in detection of cognitive impairment in Chinese elderly from the geriatric department. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012;13(7):626–629.
  • Baek MJ, Kim K, Park YH, et al. The validity and reliability of the Mini-Mental State Examination-2 for detecting mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s Disease in a Korean population. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0163792.
  • Malhotra C, Chan A, Matchar D, et al. Diagnostic performance of short portable mental status questionnaire for screening dementia among patients attending cognitive assessment clinics in Singapore. Ann Acd Med Singapore. 2013; 42:315–319.
  • Bruijnen CJWH, Dijkstra BAG, Walvoor SJW, et al. Psychometric properties of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in healthy participants aged 18–70. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2020;4:1–8.
  • Wong A, Yiu S, Nasreddine Z, et al. Validity and reliability of two alternate versions of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (Hong Kong version) for screening of mild neurocognitive disorder. PLoS One. 2018;13(5):e0196344.
  • Chiti G, Pantoni L. Use of Montreal Cognitive Assessment in patients with stroke. Stroke. 2014;45(10):3135–3140.
  • Szcześniak D, Rymaszewska J. The usfulness of the SLUMS test for diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and dementia. Psychiatr Pol. 2016;50(2):457–472.
  • Kaya D, Isik A, Usarel C, et al. The Saint Louis University Mental Status Examination is better than the Mini-Mental State Examination to determine the cognitive impairment in Turkish elderly people. J Am Med Dir Asso. 2016;17:370.ee11–370.ee15.
  • Roccaforte WH, Burke WJ, Bayer BL, et al. Reliability and validity of the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire administered by telephone. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 1994;7(1):33–38.
  • Zhang S, Wu YH, Zhang Y, et al. Preliminary study of the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Saint Louis University Mental Status Examination (SLUMS) in detecting cognitive impairment in patients with traumatic brain injury. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2019;24:1–8.
  • Falleti MG, Maruff P, Collie A, et al. Practice effects associated with the repeated assessment of cognitive function using the CogState battery at 10-minute, one week and one month test-retest intervals. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2006;28(7):1095–1112.
  • Hobart JC, Lamping DL, Thompson AJ. Evaluating neurological outcome measures: the bare essentials. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996;60(2):127–130.
  • Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med. 1998;26(4):217–238.
  • Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability. Statist Med. 1998;17(1):101–110.
  • Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Stat Med. 2002;21(9):1331–1335.
  • Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ. The mini-mental state examination: a comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40(9):922–935.
  • Steenland NK, Auman CM, Patel PM, et al. Development of a rapid screening instrument for mild cognitive impairment and undiagnosed dementia. J Alzheimers Dis. 2008;15(3):419–427.
  • Villareio A, Puertas-Martin V. Usefulness of short tests in dementia screening. Neurologia. 2011;26:425–433.
  • Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–699.
  • Roalf DR, Moore TM, Wolk DA, et al. Defining and validing a short form Montreal Cognitive Assessment (s-MoCA) for use in neurodegenerative disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87(12):1303–1310.
  • O’Bryant SE, Waring SC, Cullum CM, et al. Staging dementia using Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes scores: a Texas Alzheimer’s research consortim study. Arch Neurol. 2008;65(8):1091–1095.
  • Hughes CP, Berg L, Danziger WL, et al. A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J Psychiatry. 1982;140:566–572.
  • Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–174.
  • Huang SL, Hsieh CL, Wu RM, et al. Minimal detectable change of the timed “up & go” test and the dynamic gait index in people with Parkinson disease. Phys Ther. 2011;91(1):114–121.
  • Haley SM, Fragala-Pinkham MA. Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2006;86(5):735–743.
  • Lu WS, Wang CH, Lin JH, et al. The minimal detectable change of the simplified stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement measure. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(8):615–619.
  • Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–310.
  • Almarwani M, Perera S, VanSwearingen JM, et al. The test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of spatial and temporal gait variability during usual over-ground walking for younger and older adults. Gait Posture. 2016;44:94–99.
  • Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
  • Goldberg TE, Harvey PD, Wesnes KA, et al. Practice effects due to serial cognitive assessment: Implications for preclinical Alzheimer’s disease randomized controlled trials. Alzheimers Dement. 2015;1(1):103–111.
  • Collie A, Maruff P, Darby DG, et al. The effects of practice on the cognitive test performance of neurologically normal individuals assessed at brief test-retest intervals. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2003;9(3):419–428.
  • Cooley SA, Heaps JM, Bolzenius JD, et al. Longitudinal change in performance on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in older adults. Clin Neuropsychol. 2015;29(6):824–835.
  • Folstein MF, Folstin SE, White T, et al. Mini-mental state examination. 2nd ed. Lutz (FL): Psychological Assessment Resources; 2010.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.