“It’s really exciting to think where it could go”: a mixed-method investigation of clinician acceptance, barriers and enablers of virtual reality technology in communication rehabilitation

References

• Mulcair G, Pietranton AA, Williams C. The international communication project: raising global awareness of communication as a human right. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018;20(1):34–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Dorze G, Salois-Bellerose É, Alepins M, et al. A description of the personal and environmental determinants of participation several years post-stroke according to the views of people who have aphasia. Aphasiology. 2014;28(4):421–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilari K, Northcott S, Roy P, et al. Psychological distress after stroke and aphasia: the first six months. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24(2):181–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey L, Kagan A, Lindsay MP, et al. Incidence and profile of inpatient stroke-induced aphasia in Ontario, Canada. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(2):196–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowers HL, Silver FL, Fang J, et al. The incidence, co-occurrence, and predictors of dysphagia, dysarthria, and aphasia after first-ever acute ischemic stroke. J Commun Disord. 2013;46(3):238–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell C, Bowen A, Tyson S, et al. Interventions for dysarthria due to stroke and other adult‐acquired, non‐progressive brain injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;(1):CD002088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson S, Barbour RS, Brady M, et al. Patients' experiences of disruptions associated with post-stroke dysarthria. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2008;43(2):135–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson B, Howe T, Worrall L, et al. Social participation for older people with aphasia: the impact of communication disability on friendships. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008;15(4):325–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose M, Ferguson A, Power E, et al. Aphasia rehabilitation in Australia: current practices, challenges and future directions. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014;16(2):169–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady MC, Kelly H, Godwin J, et al. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(6):CD000425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fougeyrollas P, Noreau L, Bergeron H, et al. Social consequences of long term impairments and disabilities: conceptual approach and assessment of handicap. Int J Rehabil Res. 1998;21(2):127–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashima P, Waldron-Perrine B, Seagly K, et al. Looking beyond test results: interprofessional collaborative management of persistent mild traumatic brain injury symptoms. Top Lang Disord. 2019;39(3):293–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose FD, Brooks BM, Rizzo AA. Virtual reality in brain damage rehabilitation: review. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2005;8(3):241–262.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rizzo A, Koenig ST. Is clinical virtual reality ready for primetime? Neuropsychology. 2017;31(8):877–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro M-D, Lloréns R, Noé E, et al. Validation of a low-cost virtual reality system for training street-crossing. A comparative study in healthy, neglected and non-neglected stroke individuals. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2013;23(4):597–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons TD. Virtual reality for enhanced ecological validity and experimental control in the clinical, affective and social neurosciences. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;9:660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamovich SV, Fluet GG, Tunik E, et al. Sensorimotor training in virtual reality: a review. NeuroRehabilitation. 2009;25(1):29–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver KE, Lange B, George S, et al. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;(11):CD008349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Silva Cameirão M, Bermúdez I Badia S, Duarte E, et al. Virtual reality based rehabilitation speeds up functional recovery of the upper extremities after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study in the acute phase of stroke using the Rehabilitation Gaming System. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2011;29(5):287–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira MC, de Amorim Lima AM, Ferraz KM, et al. Use of virtual reality in gait recovery among post stroke patients-a systematic literature review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;8(5):357–362.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crosbie J, Lennon S, McGoldrick M, et al. Virtual reality in the rehabilitation of the arm after hemiplegic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Clin Rehabil. 2012;26(9):798–806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snider L, Majnemer A, Darsaklis V. Virtual reality as a therapeutic modality for children with cerebral palsy. Dev Neurorehabil. 2010;13(2):120–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirelman A, Maidan I, Herman T, et al. Virtual reality for gait training: can it induce motor learning to enhance complex walking and reduce fall risk in patients with Parkinson's disease? J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011;66(2):234–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manera V, Chapoulie E, Bourgeois J, et al. A feasibility study with image-based rendered virtual reality in patients with mild cognitive impairment and dementia. PloS One. 2016;11(3):e0151487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson KE, Allen PJ, Quail M, et al. Virtual patient clinical placements improve student communication competence. Interact Learn Environ. 2020;28(6):795–805.
   Google Scholar
• Difede J, Cukor J, Jayasinghe N, et al. Virtual reality exposure therapy for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder following. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;68(11):1639.
   Google Scholar
• Krijn M, Emmelkamp PM, Olafsson RP, et al. Virtual reality exposure therapy of anxiety disorders: a review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2004;24(3):259–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons TD, Rizzo AA. Affective outcomes of virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety and specific phobias: a meta-analysis. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2008;39(3):250–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morina N, Ijntema H, Meyerbröker K, et al. Can virtual reality exposure therapy gains be generalized to real-life? A meta-analysis of studies applying behavioral assessments. Behav Res Ther. 2015;74:18–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chirico A, Lucidi F, De Laurentiis M, et al. Virtual reality in health system: beyond entertainment. a mini-review on the efficacy of VR during cancer treatment. J Cell Physiol. 2016;231(2):275–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman HG, Chambers GT, Meyer IIW, et al. Virtual reality as an adjunctive non-pharmacologic analgesic for acute burn pain during medical procedures. Ann Behav Med. 2011;41(2):183–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma M, Zheng H. Virtual reality and serious games in healthcare. In: Advanced computational intelligence paradigms in healthcare 6 Virtual reality in psychotherapy, rehabilitation, and assessment. Springer; 2011. p. 169–192.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings JJ, Bailenson JN. How immersive is enough? A meta-analysis of the effect of immersive technology on user presence. Media Psychol. 2016;19(2):272–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater M, Steed A. Meeting people virtually: experiments in shared virtual environments. In: Schroeder R, editor. The social life of avatars: London: Springer; 2002. p. 146–171.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant L, Brunner M, Hemsley B. A review of virtual reality technologies in the field of communication disability: implications for practice and research. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15(4):365–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall J, Booth T, Devane N, et al. Evaluating the benefits of aphasia intervention delivered in virtual reality: results of a quasi-randomised study. PloS One. 2016;11(8):e0160381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalinyak-Fliszar M, Martin N, Keshner E, et al. Using virtual technology to promote functional communication in aphasia: preliminary evidence from interactive dialogues with human and virtual clinicians. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;24(4):S974–S989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galliers J, Wilson S, Marshall J, et al. Experiencing EVA park, a multi-user virtual world for people with aphasia. ACM Trans Access Comput. 2017;10(4):1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaya A, Woolf C, Devane N, et al. Receiving aphasia intervention in a virtual environment: the participants’ perspective. Aphasiology. 2018;32(5):538–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takac M, Collett J, Blom KJ, et al. Public speaking anxiety decreases within repeated virtual reality training sessions. PloS One. 2019;14(5):e0216288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu MJ, Knutson JS, Chae J. Stroke rehabilitation using virtual environments. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2015;26(4):747–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant L, Hemsley B, Bailey B, et al. editors. Opportunities for the Implementation of Immersive Virtual Reality in Rehabilitation. Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, United States; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Brundage SB, Hancock AB. Real enough: using virtual public speaking environments to evoke feelings and behaviors targeted in stuttering assessment and treatment. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;24(2):139–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyselaar E, Hagoort P, Segaert K. In dialogue with an avatar, language behavior is identical to dialogue with a human partner. Behav Res Methods. 2017;49(1):46–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staum Casasanto L, Jasmin K, Casasanto D. editors. Virtually accommodating: Speech rate accommodation to a virtual interlocutor. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2010); 2010. Austin (TX): Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Gijssels T, Casasanto LS, Jasmin K, et al. Speech accommodation without priming: the case of pitch. Discourse Processes. 2016;53(4):233–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaezipour A, Aldridge D, Wall K, et al. editors. Design and development of a virtual reality system for the management of adult neurogenic communication disorders. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct); 2019 Oct 10–18; Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2011 Census data; 2012. Available from: www.abs.gov.au
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Annual demographic & employment data 2019 member & affiliate profile; 2019. Available from: www.asha.org
   Google Scholar
• VIVE. HTC VIVE Pro headset. 2020 [cited 2020]. Available from: http://www.vive.com/au/product/vive-pro-full-kit/2020
   Google Scholar
• Wall KJ, Cumming TB, Koenig ST, et al. Using a non-immersive virtual reality approach to assess cognition in post-stroke aphasia: validating the Cognitive Assessment for Aphasia App (C3A). Aphasiology. 2018;32(sup1):54–55.
   Google Scholar
• Wall KJ, Cumming TB, Koenig ST, et al. Using technology to overcome the language barrier: the Cognitive Assessment for Aphasia App. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(11):1333–1344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooke J. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. In Usability evaluation in industry. Vol. 189. 1996. p. 4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bangor A, Kortum PT, Miller JT. An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int J Hum Comput Int. 2008;24(6):574–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy RS, Lane NE, Berbaum KS, et al. Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int J Aviat Psychol. 1993;3(3):203–220.
   Google Scholar
• Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 1989;13(3):319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden RJ, Karsh B-T. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform. 2010;43(1):159–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, et al. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly. 2003;27(3):425–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaezipour A, Rakotonirainy A, Haworth N, et al. Enhancing eco-safe driving behaviour through the use of in-vehicle human-machine interface: a qualitative study. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 2017;100:247–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ownsworth T, Theodoros D, Cahill L, et al. Perceived usability and acceptability of videoconferencing for delivering community-based rehabilitation to individuals with acquired brain injury: a qualitative investigation. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2020;26(1):47–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo (Version 12); 2018. Available from: https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qual Res Psychol. 2020. DOI:10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy RS, Drexler JM, Compton DE, et al. Configural scoring of simulator sickness, cybersickness and space adaptation syndrome: similarities and differences. In: Virtual and adaptive environments: applications, implications, and human performance issues. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 2003. p. 247.
   Google Scholar
• Wiebe EN, Lamb A, Hardy M, et al. Measuring engagement in video game-based environments: investigation of the User Engagement Scale. Comp Hum Behav. 2014;32:123–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia LJ, Rebolledo M, Metthé L, et al. The potential of virtual reality to assess functional communication in aphasia. Top Lang Disord. 2007;27(3):272–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohlberg MM, MacDonald S, Byom L, Iwashita H, et al. Social communication following traumatic brain injury part I: state-of-the-art review of assessment tools. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019;21(2):115–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook EJ, Randhawa G, Sharp C, et al. Exploring the factors that influence the decision to adopt and engage with an integrated assistive telehealth and telecare service in Cambridgeshire, UK: a nested qualitative study of patient 'users' and 'non-users'. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):137.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carragher M, Talbot R, Devane N, et al. Delivering storytelling intervention in the virtual world of EVA Park. Aphasiology. 2018;32(sup1):37–39.
   Google Scholar
• Finch E, Copley A, Cornwell P, et al. Systematic review of behavioral interventions targeting social communication difficulties after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(8):1352–1365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meulenbroek P, Cherney LR. The voicemail elicitation task: functional workplace language assessment for persons with traumatic brain injury. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019;62(9):3367–3380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompkins C, Klepousniotou E, Scott G. Treatment of right hemisphere disorders. In Aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders. United States: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2013. p. 345–364.
   Google Scholar
• Knight RG, Titov N, Crawford M. The effects of distraction on prospective remembering following traumatic brain injury assessed in a simulated naturalistic environment. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2006;12(1):8–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee M, Pyun S-B, Chung J, et al. A further step to develop patient-friendly implementation strategies for virtual reality-based rehabilitation in patients with acute stroke. Phys Ther. 2016;96(10):1554–1564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bente G, Eschenburg F, Krämer NC. editors. Virtual gaze. A pilot study on the effects of computer simulated gaze in avatar-based conversations. Proceedings of the International Conference on Virtual Reality; 2007. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Smith J. GrandChair: conversational collection of grandparents' stories [PhD thesis]. USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Gratch J, Okhmatovskaia A, Lamothe F, et al. editors. Virtual rapport. International workshop on intelligent virtual agents. USA: Springer; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• MarshJ, Nehaniv C, Gorayska B. Proceedings Second International Conference on Cognitive Technology; 1997 Aug 25–28; Aizu, Japan; 1997. p. 12–27.
   Google Scholar
• Bohil CJ, Alicea B, Biocca FA. Virtual reality in neuroscience research and therapy. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12(12):752–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T. How to improve success of technology projects in health and social care. Public Health Res Pract. 2018;28(3):2831815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehoux P, Miller FA, Daudelin G, et al. Providing value to new health technology: the early contribution of entrepreneurs, investors, and regulatory agencies. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017;6(9):509–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, et al. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones CA, Roop SC, Pohar SL, et al. Translating knowledge in rehabilitation: systematic review. Phys Ther. 2015;95(4):663–677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Procter R, Wherton J, et al. What is quality in assisted living technology? The ARCHIE framework for effective telehealth and telecare services. BMC Med. 2015;13(1):91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaezipour A, Whelan B, Wall K, et al. Acceptance of rehabilitation technology in adults with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury, their caregivers, and healthcare professionals: a systematic review. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2019;34(4):E67–E82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orihuela-Espina F, Sucar LE. Adaptation and customization in virtual rehabilitation. In Virtual reality enhanced robotic systems for disability rehabilitation. United States: IGI Global; 2016. p. 141–163.
   Google Scholar